Abstract
In “Presumptive Reasoning/Argument: An Overlooked Class” (Blair 1999) J. A. Blair makes a largely convincing case that “presumptive reasoning/argument represents a sui generis class of reasoning/argument” (Blair 1999, p.15). The strength of Blair’s paper lies in the fact that
-
a)
he demonstrates through the use of examples that there is a large class of plausible arguments/inferences that don’t fit the usual models of good deductive or of good inductive reasoning
-
b)
he sets out a list of four properties of presumptive reasoning — properties whose joint presence might be taken to be criterial for the class in question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, R.C. (2001). Argument Schemes and the Evaluation of Presumptive Reasoning. In: Argument, Inference and Dialectic. Argumentation Library, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0783-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0783-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5713-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0783-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive