Skip to main content

The combined use of acoustic tracking and echosounding to investigate the movement and distribution of common bream (Abramis brama) in the River Trent, England

  • Chapter
Aquatic Telemetry

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 165))

Abstract

Spatial behaviour and distribution of fishes along a 7.6-km lowland reach of the River Trent, England, were examined using two complementary telemetry techniques: acoustic tracking to assess the movement and activity of common bream Abramis brama (L.) and quantitative echosounding for measuring the density and distribution of fish shoals. Nine adult bream (39.3–53.2 cm) were tracked by means of intraperitoneally implanted acoustic transmitters from 19 July to 12 September 2000. Home range size varied between 0.35 and 5.40 km of river length over this period. Bream were relatively inactive during daylight hours, began moving near dusk, and tended to move throughout the night. A distinct daytime residence area was occupied by most tagged fish on most occasions, while river use at night was more variable between individuals. Mobile echosounding surveys, with the transducer beaming horizontally across the river, conducted at night between July and September 2000, showed a highly contagious fish distribution within the study reach. For 200-m sections of river, there was a negative correlation between the relative frequency of acoustic tracking fixes at night and mean fish densities, as measured by echosounding for targets larger than −50 dB (c. 5-cm long). However, there was a highly significant positive rank correlation between the relative frequency of acoustic tracking fixes and acoustic targets larger than −30 dB (c. 22-cm long), most of which in this river are bream. This suggests that telemetry and echosounding can, in this part of the River Trent, be combined to provide valuable spatial information at individual and population scales for bream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baras, E., 1997. Environmental determinants of residence area selection by Barbus barbus in the River Ourthe. Aquat. Living Resour. 10: 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, S. B., 1996. Acoustic assessment of fish abundance and distribution. In Murphy, B. R., D. W. Willis (eds), Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland: 385–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, J. M., J. J. Conneely, B. Connolly, 1996. Radio telemetric determination of bream (Abramis brama I..) movement in Irish canals. In Baras, E., J. C. Philippart (eds), Underwater Biotelemetry. University of Liège, Belgium: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. J., G. A. Wheatley, 1981. An examination of the fish population in the River Trent, Nottingham using angler catches. J. Fish Biol. 19: 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., J. Kubecka, 1993. Hydroacoustic Methods of Fish Surveys. RD Note 196, National Rivers Authority, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., J. Kubecka, 1996. Patchiness of longitudinal distributions in a river as revealed by a continuous hydroacoustic survey. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53: 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, P., 1999. Report on the Lower River Trent Fishery 19951999. Environment Agency, Nottingham: 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubecka, J., 1993. Night inshore migration and capture of adult fish by shore seining. Aquacult. Fish. Manage. 24: 685–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubecka, J., A. Duncan, 1998a. Acoustic size versus real size relationships for common species of riverine fish. Fish. Res. 35: 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubecka, J., A. Duncan, 1998b. Diurnal changes of fish behaviour in a lowland river monitored by a dual-beam echosounder. Fish. Res. 35: 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubecka, J., J. Frouzovd, A. Vilcinska, C. Wolter, O. Slavík, 2000. Longitudinal hydroacoustic survey of fish in the Elbe River, supplemented by direct capture. In Cowx, I. G. (ed.), Management and Ecology of River Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford: 14–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, T. E., 1981. The movement and distribution of sonic-tagged coarse fish in two British rivers in relation to power station cooling-water outfalls. In Lang, F. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biotelemetry. University of Wyoming: 197–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, T. E., A. G. P. Milner, D. J. Foster, J. M. Fleming, 1979. The movements and distribution of some common bream (Abramis brama L.) in the vicinity of power station intakes and outfalls in British rivers as observed by ultrasonic tracking. Laboratory note RD/L/N 145/78. Central Electricity Research Laboratories, Fawley: 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. C., E. Baras, 2000. Methods for studying the spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment. Fish and Fisheries 1: 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. C., E. Baras, 2001. Migration of Freshwater Fishes. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford: 420 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J., 1998. A hydroacoustic assessment of fish stocks in the River Trent, England. Fish. Res. 35: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J., P. Hicktcy, S. Gledhill, 2002. An evaluation of recreational fishing in England and Wales. In Pitcher, T. J., C. Hollingworth (eds), Evaluating Recreational Fisheries: an Ecological, Economic and Social Balance Sheet. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D. N., E. J. Simmonds, 1992. Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinin, L.. V. I. Kijasco,, V. D. Linnik, 1990. Ëkologiceskaja differenciacija nagulnyh skoplenij lesa. (Ecological differentiation of bream feeding shoals.) In Poddubnyi, A. G. (ed.), Struktura lokalnyh populjacii u presnovodnyh ryb. (The structure of local populations of freshwater fish). Academic Press, Rybinsk: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinin, L. K., V. 1. Kijasko, P. L. Vääränen, 1992. Behaviour and distribution of bream (Abramis brama) in oxygen deficient regions. In Priede, I. G., S. M. Swift (eds), Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals. Ellis Horwood, Chichester: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. H. K., 1996. Environmental requirements of European non-salmonid fish in rivers. Hydrobiologia 323: 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A., I. C. Russell, E. C. E. Potter, 1990. The effects of intraperitoneally implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on the behaviour and physiology of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J. Fish Biol. 37: 713–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priede, I. G., 1992. Wildlife telemetry: an introduction. In Priede, I. G., S. M. Swift (eds), Wildlife Telemetry–Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals. Ellis Horwood, Chichester: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, U., R. Berg, 1987. The migration of ultrasonically-tagged bream, Abramis brama (L.) in Lake Constance (Bodensee-Untersee). J. Fish Biol. 31: 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, B., 1967. The movements and population densities of roach (Rutilas rutilus IL.]) and gudgeon (Gobio gobio (L.]) in the River Mole. J. anim. Ecol. 36: 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, K. F., 1983. Migratory patterns of bream Abramis abramis, L. shoals in the River Suck system. Irish Fisheries Investigations, Series A. 23: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lyons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lyons, J., Lucas, M.C. (2002). The combined use of acoustic tracking and echosounding to investigate the movement and distribution of common bream (Abramis brama) in the River Trent, England. In: Thorstad, E.B., Fleming, I.A., Næsje, T.F. (eds) Aquatic Telemetry. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 165. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0771-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0771-8_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6124-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0771-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics