Skip to main content

Lakatos’ Criticisms Of Popper

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Library ((VCIL,volume 1))

Abstract

Imre Lakatos’ thought is very fascinating, but it is also fascinating to study the development of his thought. This development is not at all linear and uniform. On the contrary it is full of great upheavals, and dramatic changes of direction. The works of philosophers who often change their opinion, usually give the impression of a lack of any coherent position. Strange to say, the works of Lakatos, despite his frequent changes of opinion, do not give this impression. The reason for this paradoxical situation is perhaps that at the centre of Imre Lakatos’ philosophy there is a dialectical concept of continual change. His own changes of opinion are, consequently, compatible with his philosophical vision of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Imre Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1976, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matteo Motterlini (ed.), For and Against Method. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999, pp. 89–90. This is the English version of Motterlini’s original (1995) Italian edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid. ,p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid. ,p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pierre Duhem, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory,English translation by Philip P. Wiener. New York: Atheneum, 1962, p. 187. The book was originally published as a series of articles in French in the years 1904–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imre Lakatos, “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1970, pp. 91–195. The quotation is from p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Imre Lakatos, “Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic”, in: Imre Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1968, pp. 315–417. The quotation is from p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donald Gillies, Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century. Four Central Themes. Oxford: Blackwell 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. ,pp. 214–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gillies, D. (2002). Lakatos’ Criticisms Of Popper. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics