Abstract
The aim of this paper is a critical analysis of the methodology of Imre Lakatos. We will try to show that the full potential of Lakatos’ methodological ideas were not allowed manifest itself, because of their being confused with dialectic. By separating the hard core of Lakatosian methodology from the dialectical heritage of his marxist past, we believe there can be created a better-functioning —and more effective —methodology in the same spirit. Thus, even if we start with a criticism of Lakatos’ ideas, we will not stop there, but will try to turn our criticism into some positive emendations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agoston, M. (1976) Algebraic Topology. A First Course, Marcel Dekker Inc., New Yor.
Corfield, D. (1997) “Assaying Lakatos’s Philosophy of Mathematics”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 99–121.
Forrai, G. (1993) “From the Method of Proofs and Refutations to the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 7, No. 2. Gillies, D. (1992) Revolutions in Mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Giorello, G. (1975) “Archimedes and the Methodology of Research Programmes”, Scientia 110, pp. 125–135.
Giorello, G. (1981) “Intuition and Rigour: Some Problems of a Logic of Discovery in Mathematics”, pp. 113–135, in: M.L. Dalla Chiara (ed.), Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 47, Dordrecht.
Giorello, G. (1992) “The ‘Fine Structure’ of Mathematical Revolutions: Metaphysics, Legitimacy, and Rigour. The Case of the Calculus from Newton to Berkeley and Maclaurin”, in: Gillies 1992, pp. 134–168.
Koetsier, T. (1991) Lakatos’ Philosophy of Mathematics, A Historical Approach,North-Holland Amsterdam.
Kvasz, L. (1998) “History of Geometry and the Development of the Form of its Language”, Synthese, Vol. 116, pp. 141–186.
Kvasz, L. (1999) “On Classification of Scientific Revolutions”, Journal/br the General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, pp. 201–232.
Kvasz, L. (2000) “Changes of Language in the Development of Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica, Vol. 8, pp. 47–83.
Lakatos, I. (1968a) “Changes in the Problems of Inductive Logic”, in: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, pp. 128–200.
Lakatos, I. (1968b) “Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, pp. 149–186.
Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in:The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 1,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, pp. 8–101.
Lakatos,I.(1976),Proofs and Refutations,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lakatos, I. (1978) “The Method of Analysis and Synthesis”, in:Mathematics Science andEpistemology. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 2,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 1978, pp. 70 103.
Steiner, M. (1983) “The Philosophy of Mathematics of Imre Lakatos”, The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 80, pp. 502–521.
Wittgenstein, L. (1921),Tractatus Logico-philosophcus.Routlege, London 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kvasz, L. (2002). Lakatos’ Methodology Between Logic and Dialectic. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive