Skip to main content

Lakatos’ Methodology Between Logic and Dialectic

  • Chapter
Appraising Lakatos

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Library ((VCIL,volume 1))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is a critical analysis of the methodology of Imre Lakatos. We will try to show that the full potential of Lakatos’ methodological ideas were not allowed manifest itself, because of their being confused with dialectic. By separating the hard core of Lakatosian methodology from the dialectical heritage of his marxist past, we believe there can be created a better-functioning —and more effective —methodology in the same spirit. Thus, even if we start with a criticism of Lakatos’ ideas, we will not stop there, but will try to turn our criticism into some positive emendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agoston, M. (1976) Algebraic Topology. A First Course, Marcel Dekker Inc., New Yor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield, D. (1997) “Assaying Lakatos’s Philosophy of Mathematics”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrai, G. (1993) “From the Method of Proofs and Refutations to the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 7, No. 2. Gillies, D. (1992) Revolutions in Mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorello, G. (1975) “Archimedes and the Methodology of Research Programmes”, Scientia 110, pp. 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorello, G. (1981) “Intuition and Rigour: Some Problems of a Logic of Discovery in Mathematics”, pp. 113–135, in: M.L. Dalla Chiara (ed.), Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 47, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorello, G. (1992) “The ‘Fine Structure’ of Mathematical Revolutions: Metaphysics, Legitimacy, and Rigour. The Case of the Calculus from Newton to Berkeley and Maclaurin”, in: Gillies 1992, pp. 134–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koetsier, T. (1991) Lakatos’ Philosophy of Mathematics, A Historical Approach,North-Holland Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz, L. (1998) “History of Geometry and the Development of the Form of its Language”, Synthese, Vol. 116, pp. 141–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz, L. (1999) “On Classification of Scientific Revolutions”, Journal/br the General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, pp. 201–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz, L. (2000) “Changes of Language in the Development of Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica, Vol. 8, pp. 47–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1968a) “Changes in the Problems of Inductive Logic”, in: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, pp. 128–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1968b) “Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, pp. 149–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in:The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 1,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, pp. 8–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos,I.(1976),Proofs and Refutations,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978) “The Method of Analysis and Synthesis”, in:Mathematics Science andEpistemology. Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos Volume 2,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 1978, pp. 70 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M. (1983) “The Philosophy of Mathematics of Imre Lakatos”, The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 80, pp. 502–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1921),Tractatus Logico-philosophcus.Routlege, London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kvasz, L. (2002). Lakatos’ Methodology Between Logic and Dialectic. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics