Skip to main content

Assessing the potential yield of tropical crops: role of field experimentation and simulation

  • Chapter
Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level

Part of the book series: Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development ((SAAD,volume 6))

Abstract

This review assesses the role of field experimentation and simulation in better quantifying the potential productivity in different environments, and examines how knowledge on potential productivity can improve the efficiency of the production system. Case studies are presented for the tropical crops maize and rice to highlight the importance of temporal and spatial variation in climatic factors on the yield performance of high-input systems. The key role of field experimentation is to quantify the impacts of temperature and solar radiation on resource capture and resource utilization for a given variety. There is a need to collect minimum data sets of key crop, soil, management and climate variables, and to ensure that climatic data, particularly solar radiation, are regularly calibrated. When knowledge from field experimentation is encapsulated into crop growth simulation models, the gap between actual and potential yield for a given environment can be determined and opportunities for yield improvement can be assessed. Simulation can also be used to quantify temporal and spatial variation in productivity, for use in planning future world food supplies. Given that scope for raising maximum yields is limited, the focus of production research should be on narrowing the gap between actual and potential yields and on the maintenance of maximum yields. By characterizing the frequency of occurrence of constraints in different regions, crop simulation can potentially enhance the efficiency of plant breeding. Given the potential negative impacts of high-input agriculture on the environment, simulation can identify best-practice management options to better align resource supply with crop demand. The development of electronic data bases of climate, soil, management and crop growth data is a priority need, so that the synergy between field experimentation and simulation can be maximized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin R B, Bingham J, Blackwell R D, Evans L T, Ford M A, Morgan C L, Taylor M (1980) Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1990 and associated physiological changes. J. Agric. Sci. ( Camb. ) 94: 675–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Wopereis M C S, Wösten J H M, Stein A (1993) Soil data for crop-soil models. Pages 207–220 in Penning de Vries F W T, Teng P S, Metselaar K (Eds.) Systems approaches for agricultural development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carberry P S, Muchow R C, McCown R L (1989) Testing the CERES-Maize simulation model in a semiarid tropical environment. Field Crops Res. 20: 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman K G, Kropff M J, Gaunt J L, Peng S (1993) Nitrogen use efficiency of rice reconsidered: What are the key constraints? Plant and Soil 155 /156: 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman K G, De Datta S K, Olk D C, Alcantara J M, Samson M I, Descalsota J P, Dizon M A (1995) Yield decline and the nitrogen economy of long-term experiments on continuous, irrigated rice systems in the tropics. Advances in Soil Science (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S C, Barreto H J (1996) Using simulations models and spatial databases to improve the efficiency of plant breeding programs. In Cooper M and Hammer G L (Eds.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. ICRISAT and IRRI, CAB Intemational, Wallingford, UK (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Hammer G L (Eds.) (1996) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. ICRISAT and IRRI, CAB International, Wallingford, UK (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R L (1985) Breeding semi-dwarf soybeans. Plant Breeding Reviews 3: 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer L M, Tollenaar M (1989) Genetic improvement in photosynthetic response of hybrid maize cultivars, 1959 to 1988. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L T (1993) Processes, genes, and yield potential. Pages 687–701 in Buxton D R, Shibles R, Forsberg R A, Blad B L, Asay K H, Paulsen G M, Wilson R F (Eds.) International crop science I. CSSA Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K S, Edmeades G O, Johnson E C (1989) Selection for the improvement of maize yield under moisture-deficits. Field Crops Res. 22: 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R M (1974) A comparison of potential photosynthesis, productivity and yield of plant species with differing photosynthetic metabolism. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1: 107–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R M, Thorne J H, Hitz W D, Gianquinta R T (1984) Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225: 801–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer G L, Butler D, Muchow R C, Meinke H (1996) Integrating physiological understanding and plant breeding via crop modelling and optimisation. In Cooper M, Hammer G L (Eds.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. ICRISAT and IRRI, CAB International, Wallingford, UK (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Reyes C G, Penning de Vries F W T (1989) Evaluation of a model for simulating the potential production. Philipp. J. Crop Sci. 14 (1): 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI — International Rice Research Institute (1993) Rice research in a time of change. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines. 79 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating B A, Godwin D C, Watiki J M (1991) Optimizing nitrogen inputs in response to climatic risk. Pages 329–358 in Muchow R C, Bellamy J A (Eds.) Climatic risk in crop production: Models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Cassman K G, Van Laar H H, Peng S (1993) Nitrogen and yield potential of irrigated rice. Plant and Soil 155 /156: 391–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Van Laar H H, Matthews R B (Eds.) (1994a) ORYZAI: An ecophysiological model for irrigated rice production. SARP Research Proceedings, International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines. 110 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Cassman K G, Van Laar H H, Torres R O, Liboon S P, Williams R L, Hone T (1994b) Evaluation of the model ORYZAI. Pages 57–65 in Kropff M J, Van Laar H H, Matthews R B (Eds.) ORYZA I: An ecophysiological model for irrigated rice production. SARP Research Proceedings, International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Cassman K G, Peng S, Matthews R B, Setter T L (1994c) Quantitative understanding of yield potential. Pages 21–38 in Cassman K G (Ed.) Breaking the yield barrier. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Williams R L, Horie T, Angus J F, Singh U, Centeno H G, Cassman K G (1995) Predicting the yield potential of rice in different environments. Pages 657–664 in Humphreys E, Murray E A, Clampett W S, Lewinn L G (Eds.) Temperate rice: Achievements and potential. Proceedings of the Temperate Rice Conference, February 1994, Yanco, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith J L (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 281: 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C (1988) Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a

    Google Scholar 

  • semiarid tropical environment. III. Grain yield and nitrogen accumulation. Field Crops Res. 18:31–44. Muchow R C (1989) Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical

    Google Scholar 

  • environment. II. Effect of water deficits. Field Crops Res. 20: 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C (1990) Effect of high temperature on grain growth in field-grown maize. Field Crops Res. 23: 146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C (1994) Effect of nitrogen on yield determination in irrigated maize in tropical and subtropical environments. Field Crops Res. 38: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Bellamy J A (Eds.) (1991) Climatic risk in crop production: Models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 548 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Carberry P S (1989) Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize. Field Crops Res. 20: 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Davis R (1988) Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid environment. II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Res. 18: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Robertson M J (1994) Relating crop nitrogen uptake to sugarcane yield. Pages 122–130 in Proceedings of the 16th Conference, Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 26–29 April 1994. Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Sinclair T R (1994) Nitrogen response of leaf photosynthesis and canopy radiation use efficiency in field-grown maize and sorghum. Crop Sci. 34: 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Sinclair T R, Bennett J M (1990) Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agron. J. 82: 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Hammer G L, Carberry P S (1991) Optimising crop and cultivar selection in response to climatic risk. Pages 235–262 in Muchow R C, Bellamy J A (Eds.) Climatic risk in crop production: Models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Muchow R C, Spillman M F, Wood A W, Thomas M R (1994) Radiation interception and biomass accumulation in a sugarcane crop grown under irrigated tropical conditions. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C, Cooper M, Hammer G L (1996) Characterising environmental challenges using models. In Cooper M, Hammer G L (Eds.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. ICRISAT and IRRI, CAB International, Wallingford, UK (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix H A (1984) Strategies for crop research. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 10: 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoa R, Loomis R S (1981) Nitrogen and plant production. Plant Soil 58: 177–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park W I, Sinclair T R (1993) Consequences of climate and crop yield limits on the distribution of corn yields. Rev. Agric. Econ. 15: 483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Khush G S, Cassman K G (1994) Evolution of the new plant ideotype for increased yield potential. Pages 5–20 in Cassman K G (Ed.) Breaking the yield barrier. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning de Vries F W T, Van Keulen H, Rabbinge R (1995) Natural resources and limits of food production in 2040. Pages 65–87 in Bouma J, Kuyvenhoven A, Bouman B A M, Luyten J C, Zandstra H G (Eds.) Ecoregional approaches for sustainable land use and food production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestwidge D B, Robertson M J, Muchow R C, Hammer G L, Hughes R M, Keating B A, Kingston G, Liu D L, Wood A W (1994) SUGARBAG: A database system for sugarcane crop growth, climate, soils and management data. CSIRO Division of Trop. Crops and Pastures, Trop. Agron. Tech. Mem. No. 84, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M J, Muchow R C (1994) Future research challenges for efficient crop water use in sugarcane production. Pages 193–200 in Proceedings of the 16th Conference, Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 26–29 April 1994. Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R (1988) Selecting crops and cropping systems for water-limited environments. Pages 87–94 in Bidinger F R, Johansen C (Eds.) Drought research priorities for the dryland tropics. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R (1994) Limits to crop yield? Pages 509–532 in Boote K J, Bennett J M, Sinclair T R, Paulsen

    Google Scholar 

  • G M (Eds.) Physiology and determination of crop yield. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison WI, USA. Sinclair T R, Horie T (1989) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review.Crop Sci. 29:90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setter T L, Peng S, Kirk G J D, Virmani S S, Kropff M J, Cassman KG (1994) Physiological considerations and hybrid rice. Pages 39–62 in Cassman K G (Ed.) Breaking the yield barrier. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Berge H F M, Wopereis M C S, Shin J C (Eds.) (1994) Nitrogen economy of irrigated rice: Field and simulation studies. SARP Research Proceedings, International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines. 306 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, McCullough D E, Dwyer L M (1993) Physiological basis of the genetic improvement of corn. Pages 183–236 in Slafer G A (Ed.) Genetic improvements in field crops: Current status and development. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji G Y, Uehara G, Balas S (1994) DSSAT, Version 3: A decision support system for agrotechnology transfer. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA. 164 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W A, Loomis R S, Lepley C R (1965) Vegetative growth of corn as affected by population density. I. Productivity in relation to interception of solar radiation. Crop Sci. 5: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muchow, R.C., Kropff, M.J. (1997). Assessing the potential yield of tropical crops: role of field experimentation and simulation. In: Kropff, M.J., et al. Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0754-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0754-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4763-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0754-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics