Abstract
There is no one likely in Japanese society today who objects to the assertion that it is society’s duty to assist individuals with physical disabilities to achieve the lifestyle that they have chosen for themselves. However, these ideals do not easily translate into action. When elderly people, living on their own or living in a nuclear family, suffer a functional disability, they may strongly desire to continue living at home. When such circumstances arise, the family and those people living nearby must make sacrifices for this to be realized. The problem becomes more complicated when the ability of the elderly person to construct a reasonable wish is adversely affected by mental disorders, such as dementia. An individual suffering from dementia has not necessarily lost the ability to determine his or her lifestyle. However, we must take care not to simply accept the volition expressed by an elderly person with dementia as his/her true volition, as it may instead reflect his/her reduced ability due to the disease to think while adequately recognizing the impact on society. We also cannot hold such a person responsible for the outcome of their actions. There is a risk of endangering others by blindly accepting the wish of elderly individuals who suffer from dementia, live by themselves, and refuse to enter an old age home or receive assistance from home based care services. People living near an affected individual may be exposed to dangers, such as accidental fires because they have a neighbor who cannot follow simple safety measures Similarly, elderly individuals suffering from dementia who live alone represent a potential danger to themselves if society respects their wishes and allows them to stay at home.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akiba, E. 1997. Hannrei (Precedents about euthanasia in Japan),In Annrakusi, sonngennsi, makkiiryou (Euthanasia, death with dignity, and terminal care), eds. S. Matino, M. Maruyama, S. Nisimura, et al., 2–36. Tokyo: Sinnzannsha.
Asai, K. 1991. Roujinnseitihouno jinnkennto shoguunituite (The management and the human rights of elderly with dementia). Journal of the Japanese Association of Psychiatric Hospitals 10 (8): 40–1.
Foundation of Social Development for Senior Citizens. 1997. Aratana koureisha kaigosisutemuniokeru tihousei koureishanitaisuru hukusi sabisuteikyou oyobi kennriyougono arikatani kansuru chousakennkyuu jigyou houokukusho (Elderly services and human rights in our new social welfare system). Tokyo: Foundation of Social Development for Senior Citizens.
Honma, A. 1992. Rounennki tihoushou no ekigaku (The epidemiology of dementia in Japan). Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 21 (12): 1877–87.
Hutino, K. 1993. Tihouseiroujinn to jinnkenn (Senile dementia and human rights). Journal of the Japanese Association of Psychiatric Hospitals 11 (2): 121–6.
Ishihara, K. 1999. Tihouseiroujinnno shuumatukiiryou (Terminal care for the elderly with dementia). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10 (9): 1019–25.
Japanese Council of Social Welfare. 1999. Keiyakuteiketugaidorainn (Guidelines for the assessment of the mental capacity in Community Welfare Right Protect Program). Tokyo: Japanese Council of Social Welfare.
Kaneko, J., T. Sakamoto, T. Ohno, et al. 1964. Iwayuru isinouryokuno seisinnigakuteki kennkyuu — Kinntisann sermkokuno baaiwo chuusinnni (A psychiatric study about mental capacity). Japanese Journal of Psychiatry 4 (6): 499–502.
Kasiwagi, T. 2000. Tihouseikoureishano taminaru kea (Terminal care of the aged with dementia). Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 9 (6): 623–7.
Maeda, T. 1997a. Kinntisann, junnkinntisannnikannsuru seisinnkannteireino kenntou (Psychiatric opinions in civil law). Tokushima Daigaku Shakaikagakukennkyu 10: 33–94.
Maeda, T. 1997b. Kinntisann mataha junnkinntisanwo sennkokusuru kijunn — Seisinnshougaishano kouinouryoku oyobi isinouryoku. (The standard of mental capacity of guardianship for psychiatric patients). Kasaigeppou 49 (3): 1–63.
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. 1993. Shuumatukiiryounikannsuru kokuminno ishikichousa houkokusho (National Survey about Terminal Care).
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. 1995. Kokuminn seikatsu kiso chousa (National Livelihood Basic Survey).
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. 1998. Kokuminn seikatsu kiso chousa (National Livelihood Basic Survey).
Miyake, K. 1930. Seisinnouryoku —seisinnigakuyorimitaru (Mental capacity from a psychiatric point of view). Tokyo: Iwanami-Shotenn.
Nakatanai, K., and M. Nakatani. 1993. Tihoukannjano sekininnnouryoku (Mental capacity of the elderly with dementia). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 4 (2): 127–35.
Nisiyama, A. 1998. Kaiteibann minnjiseisinnkannteino jissai (A practical guide for the assessment of mental capacity in civil law). Tokyo: Sinnkouigakushuppann.
Office of Measures for the Elderly, General Affairs Agency of Japan. 1999. Kourei shakaitaisaku kannkei siryoushu (Statistics of the aging society).
Otuka, T., T. Karasawa, M. Matusita, et al. 1992. Wagakunino tihouseiroujinn no shutugenritu (The prevalence of the dementia in Japanese elderly). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 3 (4): 43–59.
Ozawa, I. 1993. Tihouroujinnno jinnkenntoha (What are the human rights of the elderly with dementia?). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 4 (2): 121–6.
Saito, M. 1993. Seisinnhokennhouto tihoukannja (The Mental Health Act of Japan and dementia patients). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 4 (2): 155–160
Saito, M. 1997. Tihouseisikkannwo yuusuru koureishano zaisannkannei (Financial affairs of the elderly with dementia). Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 26 (11): 1399–1405.
Saito, M. 1999. Keiyaku teiketu gaidorainn ni tuite (Guidelines for the assessment of mental capacity in Community Welfare Right Protect Program). Monthly Welfare 99 (12): 36–41.
Saito, M. 1999. Tihousei sikkannno iryou hokenn hukusito jinnkwnn (Health and social welfare services and the human rights for the elderly in Japan). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10 (10): 1219–23.
Saito, M. 2000a. Ishinouryokuno kekkannto koureishano jinnkenn. koureishakainiokeru iryou hokenn hukusiseidoto koureishano jinnkenn (Report of the old age science comprehensive research expenditure), 25–35.
Saito, M. 2000b. Yuuryouroujinnhomuniokeru tihouseisikkannwo yuusuru koureishano shoguuni kannsuru chousa. Koureishakainiokeru iryou hokenn hukusiseidoto koureishano jinnkenn (Report of the old age science comprehensive research expenditure), 36–42.
Science Council of Japan. 1994. Iryou tokubetuiinnkai houoku (Report of the special committee for medical affairs).
Shiraisi, H. 2000. Tihouseikoureishano isinouryoku hyoukahou (Mental capacity assessment for people with senile dementia). Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 29 (6): 597–601.
Statistic Bureau, General Affairs Agency of Japan. National Census 1970.
Statistic Bureau, General Affairs Agency of Japan. National Census 1995,
Supreme Court of Japan. 2000. Atarasii seinennkoukennseidoniokeru sinndannsho sakuseino tebiki, kannteisho sakuseino tebiki (Guidelines for the assessment of mental capacity in the new guardianship law).
Terasima, S. 1980. Kinntisann, junnkinntisann sennkokumousitatejikennno jittaito seisinnkannteino monndaitenn (Psychiatric problems in the application of guardianship orders in Japan). Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica 82: 708–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saito, M. (2001). Decision-Making in Social and Medical Services for Patients with Dementia in Japan. In: Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma, D.C., Gauthier, S., Tomossy, G.F. (eds) Aging: Caring for Our Elders. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0675-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0675-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5897-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0675-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive