Advertisement

On the Invariance of Manipulability Indices

  • E. Staffetti
  • H. Bruyninckx
  • J. De Schutter
Chapter

Abstract

This work discusses the invariance of local manipulability indices which are used to convert into a scalar the capability of a robotic device at a given configuration to perform a manipulation task. It is shown that they suffer from non-invariance in the sense that arbitrariness in the choice of the metric functions employed in their definition is unavoidable and they are not invariant under changes of the arbitrary choices introduced. Since there do not exist natural norms in the spaces of generalized forces and velocities, kinematic manipulability is neither an invariant concept nor a natural notion.

Keywords

Manipulability singularities invariance. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zlatanov, D., Benhabib, B., and Fenton, R.G. (1994), Singularity Analysis of Mechanisms Via a Velocity-Equation Model of the Instantaneous Kinematics, 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Yoshikawa, T., (1985), Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3–9, 1985.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee, J., Duffy, J., and Hunt, K. H., (1998), A Practical Quality Index Based on the Octahedral Manipulator, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1081–1090, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang, Y., Duffy, J., and Crane, C., (2000), The Optimum Quality Index for a Spatial Redundant 4–8 In-Parallel Manipulator in J. Lenarcic and M. M. Stanisié (eds.) Advances in Robot Kinematics, Kluwer Acedemic Publisher, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Park, F. C., and Kim, J. W., (1998), Manipulability and Singularity Analysis of Multiple Robot Systems: A Geometric Approach, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Bicchi, A., and Prattichizzo, D., (2000), Manipulability of Cooperating Robots with Unactuated Joints and Closed-Chain Mechanisms, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 336–345, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Park, F. C., (1995), Distance Metrics on the Rigid Body Motions with Applications to Mechanism Design, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Salisbury, J. K., and Craig, J. J., (1982), Articulated Hands: Force Control and Kinematic Issues, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp 4–17, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, C. A., and Blaho, B. E., (1987), Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gosselin, C. M., (1992), The Optimum Design of Robotic Manipulators Using Dexterity Indices, Robotics and Autonomous System, vol. 9, pp. 213–226, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Dubey, R., and Luh, J. S., (1988), Redundant Robot Control Using Task Based Performance Measures, Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 409–432, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Staffetti
    • 1
  • H. Bruyninckx
    • 1
  • J. De Schutter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenHeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations