Advertisement

Design of 2-Dof Parallel Mechanisms for Machining Applications

  • Félix Majou
  • Philippe Wenger
  • Damien Chablat
Chapter

Abstract

A design method based on velocity amplification factors analysis is presented in this paper, through the design of two simple two-degree-offreedom Parallel Kinematic Mechanisms (PKM) dedicated to machining applications. The largest square useful Cartesian workspace is achieved for given kinetostatic performances. Its orientation and position are chosen to avoid singularities and to produce the best ratio between Cartesian workspace size and mechanism size. The size of each designed mechanism is used as a comparative criterion.

Keywords

Parallel Kinematic Machine Tool Velocity Amplification Factors Optimal Workspace Design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeles, J. (1997), Fundamentals of robotic mechanical systems,Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Chablat, D., Wenger, P. and Angeles, J. (2000), Conception isotropique d’une morphologie parallèle: application à l’usinage, 3rd Int. Conf. on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Chablat, D., Wenger, P. (1999), On the characterization of the regions of feasible trajectories in the workspace of parallel manipulators, 10th World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
  4. Gosselin, C., Angeles, J. (1990), Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains, Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Kim, J., Park, C., Kim, J. and Park, F.C. (1997), “Performance Analysis of Parallel Manipulator Architectures for CNC Machining Applications”, IMECE Symposium on Machine Tools, Dallas, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Majou, F., Wenger, P. and Chablat, D. (2002), Design of a 3 axis parallel machine tool for high speed machining: the Orthoglide, 4th Conf. on IDMME, Clermont Ferrand, France.Google Scholar
  7. Merlet, J-P. (1997), Les robots parallèles, Paris, Hermes.Google Scholar
  8. Wenger, P., Chablat, D. (2000), Kinematic analysis of a new parallel machine tool: the Orthoglide, Advances in Robot Kinematic, Portoroz, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  9. Wenger, P., Gosselin, C. and Chablat, D., (2001), A comparative study of parallel kinematic architectures for machining applications, 2nd Workshop on Computational Kinematics, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  10. Yoshikawa, T. (1985), Manipulability of Robot Mechanisms, The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, no. 2, vol. 4, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  11. Zlatanov, D. S., Fenton, R. G., Benbabib, B. (1994), Analysis of the instantaneous kinematics and singular configurations of hybrid-chain manipulators, 23rd ASME Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Félix Majou
    • 1
  • Philippe Wenger
    • 1
  • Damien Chablat
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Recherches en Communications et Cybernétique de NantesNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations