Abstract
In the past the focus of productive functions of forests and rendered the assessment of information forest resource assessments was put on the assessment of the inside forested areas sufficient. The need to monitor the sustainability of yield made permanent surveys a widespread tool in forest surveys. Nowadays the public awareness concerning environmental issues and forests and the information needs expressed by decision makers requires a shift from production oriented forest resource assessments towards assessments that provide information on the multiple functions of forests. Only a limited amount of information can be provided by adding a set of new attributes to the list of attributes commonly used in assessing the productive function of forests and utilizing their survey designs. The diverse information needs that have to be satisfied by multi-resource forest surveys require the adoption of new assessment and survey approaches and the extension of assessments from forests to landscapes. This paper reviews a selection of methodological approaches recently presented for the assessment of the multiple functions of forests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bachmann, P., Köhl, R., Päivinen, M. (eds.) 1998. Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 421 p.
Barabesi, L., Fattorini, L. 1995. Kernel plant density estimation by a ranked set sampling of point-to plant distances. In The Monte Verita Conference on Forest Survey Designs. Köhl, M. et al. (eds).WSL/ ETHZ, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: 71–80.
Bodmer, H.C. 1988. Forest Stands Mapping by Means of Satellite Imagery in the Swiss Middle Lands. In Proc. of IUFRO Subj. Group 4.02.05, Finland: 53–61.
Brändli, U.B., Kaufmann, E., Stierlin, H.R. 1995. Survey of biodiversity at the forest margin in the second Swiss NFI. In The Monte Verita Conference on Forest Survey Designs. Köhl, M. et al. (eds). WSL/ ETHZ, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: 141–150.
Brändli, U.B., Ulmer, U. 1999. Naturschutz und Erholung. In Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar: Ergebnisse der Zweitaufnahme. Brassel, P., Brändli, U.B. (eds.). 1993–1995: p. 309 ff.
Carlowitz, H. von 1713. Sylvicultura Economica oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht, J.F. Braun, Leipzig.
Brassel, P. 1995. Assessment of Non-Productive Forest Functions in the Swiss NFI. In The Monte Verita Conference on Forest Survey Designs. Köhl, M. et al. (eds). WSL/ ETHZ, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: 38–46.
Clayton, G., Cox, T.F. 1986. Some robust density estimators for spatial point processes. Biometrics 42: 753–767.
Dietrich, V. 1941. Forstliche Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Bd. 3, Erfolgsrechnung–Zielsetzung, Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg.
Dillworth, M., Whistler, J.L., Merchant, J.W. 1994. Measuring landscape structure using geographic and geometric windows. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 60 (10): 1215–1224.
EC (European Commission) 1997. Study on European Forestry Information and Communication System: Report on Forest Inventory and Survey Systems. European Commission, Luxembourg.
Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 620 p.
Gadow, K. von 1995. Forest Planning in Europe–with Particular Reference to Central Europe. In Multiple Use and Environmental Values in Forest Planning. Hyttinen, P., A. Kähkönen, P. Pelli (eds.). EFI Proceedings 4: 5–18.
Gray, P.A., Cameron, D., Kirkham, I. 1996. Wildlife habitat evaluation in forested ecosystems: some examples from Canada and the United States. In Conservation of faunal diversity in forested landscapes. deGraaf, R.M., Miller, R.I. (eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York: 407–533.
Hagen, O. von 1867. Die forstlichen Verhältnisse Preußens, J. Springer, Berlin.
Hartig, G.L. 1804. Anweisung zur Taxation der Forste oder zur Bestimmung des Holzertrags der Wälder, Heyer, Gießen.
Holmgren, P., Thuresson, T. 1998. Satellite Remote Sensing for Forestry Planning–A Review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: S. 90–110, 1998.
Innes, J.L. 1995. Assessment of Non-Timber Functions: Forest Ecosystems, In The Monte Verita Conference on Forest Survey Designs. Köhl, M. et al. (eds). WSL/ ETHZ, Birmensdorf, Switzerland: 269–280.
ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organisation) 1992. Criteria for the measurement of sustainable tropical forest management. ITTO Policy Development Series 3, ITTO, Yokohama.
Jennings, M.D. 2000. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology 15: 5–20.
Kellenberger, T. 1996. Erfassung der Waldfläche in der Schweiz mit multispektralen Satellitenbilddaten. Remote Sensing Series, 28, Univ. Zürich, Geographisches Institut, 284 S.
Kilkki, P., Päivinen, R. 1987. Reference Sample Plots to Combine Field Measurements and Satellite Data in Forest Inventories. University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Mensuration and Management, Research Notes 19: 209–215.
Kenter, B., Coch, T., Köhl, M. 2002. Development of Methods and Tools for Monitoring Forest Biodiversity as a Contribution to Sustainable Forest Management in Europe (DMMD)–A Multitemporal Analysis of Habitat Suitability. In Collecting and analysing information for SFM and biodiversity monitoring with special reference to Mediterranean Ecosystems. IUFRO-conference, Palermo, Sicily, 4–7 December 2001.
Köhl, M., Lautner, M. 2001. Erfassung von Waldökosystemen durch Hyperspektraldaten, Photogrammetrie–Fernerkundung–Geoinformation, Heft 2: 107–117.
Leibundgut, H. 1949. Grundzüge der Schweizerischen Waldbaulehre, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 68: 257–291.
McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J. 1994. FRAGSTATS–spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, Forest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
MCPFE 1998a. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. General declaration and resolutions adopted. Resolution L 2. Liaison Unit in Lisbon (Ed.), June 1998.
MCPFE 1998b. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Follow-up Reports on the Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Volume II. Liaison Unit in Lisbon (Ed.), June 1998.
MCPFE 2000. General Declarations and Resolutions Adopted by the MCPFE. Liaison Unit Vienna, Vienna.
Merchant, J.W. 1984. Using Spatial Logic in Classification of Landsat TM Data, Proceedings of the Pecora IX Symposium. 378–385, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Noss, R.F. 1999. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. Forest Ecology Management 115: 135–146.
Oehmichen, K. 2001. Vergleich von Landschaftsindizes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des geometrischen-und geographischen Window–Konzeptes, Diplomarbeit, TU Dresden, Fakultät Forst-, Geo-, Hydrowissenschaften, Tharandt.
Ord, K. 1990. Statistical methods for point pattern data. In Spatial statistics: past, present, future. Griffith, D.A. (ed.). Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, Michigan: 31–53.
Ott, W.R. 1978. Environmental Indices: Theory and Practice. Ann Arbour Science. Ann Arbour.
Patil, G.P., Burnham, K.P., Kovner, J.L. 1979. Nonparametric estimation of plant density by the distance method. Biometrics 35: 597–604.
Patil, G.P., Sinha, A.K., Taillie, C. 1994. Ranked set sampling. In Environmental statistics. Patil, G.P., Rao, C.R., (eds.). Handbook of statistics No. 12, North-Holland, Amsterdam: 167–200.
Rand, G.M., Newman, J.R. 1998. The applicability of habitat evaluation methodologies in ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4: 905–929.
Richter, A. 1963. Einführung in die Forsteinrichtung, Naumann Verlag, Radebeul.
Ricotta, C., Avena, G.C., Olsen, E.R. 1998. Geographic windows in the fractal analysis of local landscape complexity. Abstracta Botanica 22: 143–147.
Ringvall, A., Ståhl, G. 1999. Field aspects of line intersect sampling for assessing coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology and Management 119: 163–170.
Roesch, F. 1993. Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Forest Inventories. Forest Science 39: 655–669.
Scott, A.J., Seber, G.A.F. 1983. Differences of proportions from the same survey. The American Statistician 37: 319–320.
Speidel, G. 1972. Planung im Forstbetrieb, Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin.
Ståhl, G., Lämås, T. 1998. Assessment of coarse woody debris, a comparison of probability sampling methods. In Assessment of forest biodiversity for improved forest management. Bachmann, P., Köhl, M., Päivinnen, R. (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 241–248.
Ståhl, G. 1998. The transect relascope, an instrument for the quantification of coarse woody debris. Forest Science 44 (1): 201–215.
Thompson, S.K. 1990. Adaptive Cluster Sampling. JASA 85: 1050–1059.
Tomppo, E. 1993. Multi-source National Forest Inventory of Finland. In Proceedings of the Ilvessalo symposium on National Forest Inventories. A. Nyssönen (ed.). Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper 444: 52–59.
Upton, G., Fingleton, B. 1985. Spatial data analysis by example. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Vol I, 408 p.
Ziese, H. 1999. Adaptive Gruppenstichproben zur Erfassung seltener Ereignisse, Diplomarbeit TU-Dresden, Fakultät Forst-, Geo-, Hydrowissenschaften, Tharandt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Köhl, M. (2003). New Approaches for Multi Resource Forest Inventories. In: Corona, P., Köhl, M., Marchetti, M. (eds) Advances in Forest Inventory for Sustainable Forest Management and Biodiversity Monitoring. Forestry Sciences, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0649-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0649-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6466-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0649-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive