Skip to main content

Invasive Ecology of Weeds in Agricultural Systems

  • Chapter
Weed Biology and Management

Abstract

No community is truly safe from plant invaders. Nor should it be. Succession is the normal process of species invading and replacing other species (Huston, 1994; Johnstone, 1986; Rejmánek, 1989), although this connection between invasion and succession is often ignored (Davis et al., 2001). The problem is that some plant invasions have high ecological and economic costs associated with them (Parker et al., 1999; Pimentel et al., 2000, 2001). Some economic costs of invasion are easily quantifiable (e.g. the cost of weed control, yield loss) whereas other are not (e.g., damage to ecosystems, loss of recreational land, aesthetics). The cost of invasive plants to crop and pasture land in the United States is calculated as well over 34 billion dollars annually (Pimentel et al., 2000), while in India, the cost stands even higher at 38 billion per year (Pimentel et al., 2001). Any ability to predict what species could invade will therefore have economic and ecological benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, H.G. “Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds.” In The Genetics of Colonizing Species, H.G. Baker, G.L. Stebbins, eds. New York: Academic Press, 1965; pp. 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth B.D., Swanton C.J. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci 2002; 50: 2–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D.G. Beetle folivory increases resource availability and alters plant invasion in monocultures of goldenrod. Ecology 1994; 75: 1673–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case T.K. Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Phil Nat Acad Sci 1990; 87: 9610–9614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chicoine T., Hahn K. Managing winter and spring annuals. Crop Insights 2001; 11: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J. “What makes a community invasible?” In Colonization, Succession and Stability, A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley, P.J. Edwards, eds. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1987; pp. 429–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J., Brown S.L., Heard M.S., Edwards G.R. Invasion-resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? Ecol Letters 1999; 2: 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler C.C. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol Cons 1998; 84: 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler C.C., Carino D.A. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol Inv 2000; 2: 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio C.M. Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology 1993; 74: 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. The Origin of Species. London: Reprinted by Penguin Books, 1859

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Pelsor M. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol Letters 2001; 4: 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M.A., Grime J.P., Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 2000; 88: 528–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M.A., Thompson K., Grime J.P. Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Divers Distr 2001; 7: 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derksen D.A., Lafond G.P., Thomas A G., Loeppky H.A., Swanton C.J. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci 1993; 41: 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Acosta A., Cabido M. Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimes. J Veg Sci 1992; 3: 689–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S., Cabido M., Casanoves F. “Functional implications of trait-environment linkages in plant communities.” In Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats, E. Weir, P. A. Keddy eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a; pp. 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S., Cabido M., Zak M., Martinez Carretero E., Aranibar J. Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use history along a climatic gradient in central-western Argentina. J Veg Sci 1999b; 10: 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Barradas M.C., Zunzunegui M., Tirado R., Ain-Lhout F., Garcia Novo F. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in Mediterranean shrubland. J Veg Sci 1999; 10: 709–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak D.F., Bigger D., Harding E.K., Marvier M.A., O’Malley R.E., Thomson D. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am Nat 1998; 151: 264–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes J.S., Mooney H.A. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 1999; 14: 135–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elton C.S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, London: Methuen and Co, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank L.G. Biological flora of the British Isles, No 165: Agrostemma githago L. J Ecol 1988; 76: 1232–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox M.D., Fox B.J. “The susceptibility of natural communities to invasion”. In Ecology of Biological Invasions, R.H. Groves, J.J. Burdon, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986; pp. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitay H., I. R. Nobel, J. H. Connel. Deriving functional types for rain-forest trees. J Veg Sci 1999; 10: 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D. The theory of diversity-stability relationships in ecology. Quart Rev Biol 1975; 50: 237–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin B.J, McAllister A.J., Fahrig L. Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Cons Biol 1999; 13: 422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 1977; 111: 1169–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. Plant Strategies and Vegetational Processes,Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 1979. Grime J.P. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 1997; 277:1260–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings M.S., DiTomaso J.M. Fire controls yellow starthistle in California grasslands. Rest Manage Notes 1996; 14: 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood V.H. “Patterns, extents and modes of invasion by terrestrial plants.” In Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J Kruger, M. Rejmânek, M. Williamson, eds. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1989; pp. 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.J. “The nature and effects of disturbance relative to invasions.” In Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J Kruger, M. Rejmanek, M. Williamson, eds. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1989; 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.J. “Land-use changes and invasions.” In Invasive Species in a Changing World, H.A. Mooney, R.J. Hobbs eds. Washington DC: Island Press, 2000; pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R.K., Huenneke L.F. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Cons Biol 1992; 6: 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D.U., Vitousek P.M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol Monogr 1998; 68: 121–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M.A. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M.A., D’Angelis D.L. Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am Nat 1994; 144: 954–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone I.M. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biol Rev 1986; 61: 369–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King S.E., Grace J.B. The effects of gap size and disturbance type on invasion of wet pine savanna by cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (Poaceae). Am J Bot 2000; 87: 1279–1286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer M. Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape. J Veg Sci 1999; 10: 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knops J.M.H., Tilman D., Haddad N.M., Naeem S., Mitchell C.E., Haarstad J., Ritchie M.E., Howe K.M., Reich P.B., Siemann E., Groth J. Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol Letters 1999; 2: 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar C.S., Lodge D.M. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 2001; 16: 199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyser G.B., DiTomaso J.M. Instability in a grassland community after the control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) with prescribed buming. Weed Sci 2002; 50: 648–657.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S., McIntyre S., Lansberg J., Forbes T.D.A. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 1997; 12: 474–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leps J., Brown V.K., Diaz Len T.A., Gormsen D., Hedlund K., Kailovâ J., Korthals G.W., Mortimer S.R., Rodriguez-Barrueco C., Roy J., Santa Regina I., van Dijk C., van der Putten W.H. Separating the chance effect from other diversity effects in the functioning of plant communities. Oikos 2001; 92: 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J.M., D’Antonio C.M. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 1999; 87: 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J.M. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 2000; 288: 852–854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge D.M. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 1993; 8: 133–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale W.M. Global pattems of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 1999; 80: 1522–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon K.G., Schwartz M.W. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function — invasion resistance. Ecol Letters 2001; 4: 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 1955; 36: 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R.N. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol Cons 1996; 78: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F.A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 2000; 10: 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May R. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S., Lavorel S., Landsberg J., Forbes T.D.A. Disturbance response in vegetation–towards a global perspective on functional traits. J Veg Sci 1999; 10: 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J.L., Mouquet N., Lawton J.H., Loreau M. Coexistence, saturation and invasion resistance in simulated plant assemblages. Oikos 2001; 94: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Committee on the Scientific Basis for Predicting the Invasion Potential of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel I.R., Slatyer R.O. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 1980; 43: 5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians G.H. “Site characteristics favoring invasions.” In Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986; pp. 133–148.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M.W., Maurer T.A. Does diversity beget diversity? A case study of crops and weeds. J Veg Sci 1997; 8: 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker I.M., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Goodell K., Wonham M., Kareiva P.M., Williamson M.H., Von Holle B., Moyle P.B., Byers J.E., Goldwasserr L. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1999; 1: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks R.J., Curran W.S., Roth G.W., Hartwig N.L., Calvin D.D. Herbicide susceptibility and biological fitness of triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci 1996; 44: 517–523.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrins J., Fitter A., Williamson M. Population biology and rates of invasion of three introduced Impatiens species in the British Isles. J Biogeog 1993; 20: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrins J., Williamson M., Fitter A. A survey of differing views of weed classification: implications for regulation of introductions. Biol Cons 1992; 60: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung P.C., Williams P.A., Halloy S.R. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Env Manag 1999; 57: 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D.A., McNair S., Janecka J., Wightman J., Simmonds C., O’Connell C., Wong E., Russel L., Zem J., Aquino T., Tsomondo T. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosys Env 2001; 84: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D.A., Lach L., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Environmental and economic costs of non-indigenous species in the United States. BioScience 2000; 50: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planty-Tabacchi A., Tabacchi E., Naiman R.J., DeFerrari C., Decamps H. Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones. Cons Biol 1996; 10: 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pysek P. Is there a taxonomic pattem to plant invasions? Oikos 1998; 92: 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pysek P. Past and future predictions in plant invasions: a field test by time. Diver Dist 2001; 7: 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pysek P., Prach K., Smilauer P. “Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora.” In Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmânek, M. Wade, eds. Amsterdam: SPA Academic Publishing, 1995; pp. 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard S.H., Hamilton C.W. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Cons Biol 1997; 11: 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmânek M. “Invasibility of plant communities.” In Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. DiCastri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmânek, M. Williamson. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1989; pp. 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmânek M. “What makes a species invasive?” In Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems, P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmânek, M. Wade, eds. Amsterdam: SPA Academic Publishing, 1995; pp. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmânek M., Richardson D.M. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 1996; 77: 1655–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D’Antonio C.M., Milton S.J., Rejmânek M. Plant invasion — the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 2000a; 75: 65–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D.M., Pysek P., Rejmânek M., Barbour M.G., Panetta F.D., West C.J. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Div Distri 2000b; 6: 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G.R., Quinn J.F., Stanton M.L. Invasibility of experimental habitat in California winter annual grassland. Ecology 1995; 76: 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J., Navas M.L., Sonie L. “Invasions by annual brome grasses: a case study challenging the homocline approach to invasions.” In Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions, R.H. Groves, F. di Castri, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991; pp. 207–224.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.K., Panetta F.D. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. J Biogeog 1993; 20: 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha A., Knezevic S.Z., Roy R.C., Ball-Coelh B.R., Swanton C.J. Effect of tillage, cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil. Weed Res 2002; 42: 76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M.D., Knapp A.K. Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in tallgrass prairie. Int J Plant Sci 2001; 162: 782–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T.M. Shugart H.H., Woodward F.I. (eds). Plant Functional Types. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T.J., Binkley D., Chong G.W., Kalkham M.A., Schell L.D., Bull K.A., Otsuki Y. Newman G., Bashkin M., Son Y. Exotic plants invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol Mono 1999; 69: 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T.J., Bull K.A., Otsuki Y., Villa C., Lee M. Riparian zones as havens for exotic plant species in the central grasslands. PI Ecol 1998; 138: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T.J., Otsuki Y., Villa C., Lee M., Belnap J. Patterns of invasions: a case example of native species hotspots and rare habitats. Biol Inv 2001; 3: 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton C.J., Shrestha A., Roy R.C., Ball-Coelho B.R., Knezevic S.Z. Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora. Weed Sci 1999; 47: 454–461.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton C.J., Clements D.R., Derksen D.A. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Tech 1993; 7: 286–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K., Hodgson J.G., Rich T.C.G. Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography 1995; 18: 390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. The importance of mechanisms of the interspecific interaction. Am Nat 1987; 129: 769–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 1997; 78: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 1999; 80: 1455–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Putten W.H., Mortimer S.R., Hedlund K., van Dijk C., Brown V.K., Leps J., Rodriguez-Barrueco C., Roy J., Diaz Len T.A., Gormsen D., Korthals G.W., Lavorel S., Santa Regina 1., Smilauer P. Plant species diversity as a driver of early succession in abandoned fields: a multi-site approach. Oecologia 2000; 124: 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M., D’Antonio C.M., Loope, L.L., Westbrooks R. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 1996; 84: 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade M. “Predicting plant invasions: making a start.” In Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe, J.H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pysek, D. Green. Leiden: Backhuys Publ., 1997; pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E., Keddy P.A. “Assembly rules as general constraints on community composition.” In Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats, E. Weiher, P.A. Keddy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999; pp. 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E., van der Werf A., Thompson K., Roderick M., Gamier E., Eriksson O. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 1999; 10: 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. “Mathematical models of invasion.” In Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J Kruger, M. Rejmânek, M. Williamson, eds. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1989; pp. 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Booth, B.D., Murphy, S.D., Swanton, C.J. (2004). Invasive Ecology of Weeds in Agricultural Systems. In: Inderjit (eds) Weed Biology and Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0552-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0552-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6493-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0552-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics