Abstract
The first competition legislation, introduced in 1948, was predominantly concerned with cartels which were then the main form of industrial structure. A Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Commission was established as an independent investigatory body which conducted enquiries directed to it by the Board of Trade. ‘Monopoly’ was defined as a single firm, or group of firms acting together to restrict competition, and which controlled at least one third share of the market. There was presumption that monopoly as defined was per se detrimental. This was partly a consequence of earlier government encouragement to, and use made of cartels. There was a contrary belief that as much of industry was dominated by small and high cost firms, the efficiency of large scale firms would more than offset any adverse effects of single firm dominance. An economic definition of the public interest was laid down, and if monopoly of either kind met the performance tests which derived from the definition it was allowed to continue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A Review of Monopolies and Mergers — A Consultative Document. Cmnd 7198 HMSO, London 1978, and Press Statement, 5 July 1984, Department of Trade and Industry.
Cmnd 7198 Appendix Table 6.
S & W Beresford and the British Sugar Corporation, HC241, 1980–81. HMSO, London.
Brozen, Y., Concentration, Mergers and Public Policy, Macmillan Publishing, New York (1982).
Demsetz, H., `Industry Structure, Market Rivalry and Public Policy’, Journal of Law and Economics (1973).
Comonor, W. S. and Wilson, T. A., Advertising and Market Power, Harvard University Press (1974).
Hart, P. E. and Clarke, R., Concentration in British Industry 1935–75, Cambridge University Press (1980).
Stigler, G. J., The Theory of Price, Collier-Macmillan (1966).
Porter, M. E., `The Structure within Industries and Companies, Review of Economics and Statistics (1979).
The Supply of Primary Batteries, HC1, 1974–75, HMSO, London.
The Supply of Man-Made Cellulosic Fibres, HC 263, 1967–68, HMSO, London.
The Supply of Indirect Electrostatic Reprographic Equipment, HC 47, 1976–77, HMSO, London.
The Supply of Chlordiazepoxide and Diazepam, HC 197, 1972–73, HMSO, London.
The Supply of Clutch Mechanisma for Road Vehicles, HC 32, 1968–69, HMSO, London.
The Supply of Household Detergents; HC 105, 1966–67, HMSO, London.
The Supply and Export of Machinery for the Manufacture of Footwear, HC 215, 1972–73, HMSO, London.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gribbin, J.D., Utton, M.A. (1986). The Treatment of Dominant Firms in the UK Competition Legislation. In: de Jong, H.W., Shepherd, W.G. (eds) Mainstreams in Industrial Organization. Studies in Industrial Organization, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0493-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0493-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0495-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0493-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive