Abstract
The central aim of many empirical studies in the physical, behavioral, social, and biological sciences is the elucidation of cause-effect relationships among variables. It is through cause-effect relationships that we obtain a sense of a “deep understanding” of a given phenomenon, and it is through such relationships that we obtain a sense of being “in control,” namely, that we are able to shape the course of events by deliberate actions or policies. It is for these two reasons, understanding and control, that causal thinking is so pervasive, popping up in everything from everyday activities to high-level decision-making: For example, every car owner wonders why an engine won’t start; a cigarette smoker would like to know, given his/her specific characteristics, to what degree his/her health would be affected by refraining from further smoking; a policy maker would like to know to what degree anti-smoking advertising would reduce costs of health care; and so on. Although a plethora of data has been collected on cars and on smoking and health, the appropriate methodology for extracting answers to such questions from the data has been fiercely debated, partly because some fundamental questions of causality have not been given fully satisfactory answers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, E., The Logic of Conditionals , Chapter 2, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1975.
Balke, A. and Pearl, J., “Probabilistic evaluation of counterfactual queries,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle, WA, Volume I, 230–237, July 31–August 4, 1994.
Balke, A. and Pearl, J., “Counterfactual probabilities: Computational methods, bounds, and applications,” in R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-94), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 46–54, July 29–31, 1994.
Balke, A. and Pearl, J., “Counterfactuals and Policy Analysis in Structural Models,” in P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence11, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 11–18, 1995.
Dalkey, N., “Webs,” UCLA Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Technical Report (R-166), Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, March 1994.
Darwiche, A., and Pearl, J., “Symbolic causal networks for planning under uncertainty,” In Symposium Notes of the 1994 AAAI Spring Symposium on Decision-Theoretic Planning, Stanford, CA, 41–47, March 21–23, 1994.
Dechter, R. and Pearl, J., “Directed constraint networks: A relational framework for Causal Modeling,” in Proceedings, 12th International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), Sydney, Australia, 1164–1170, August 24–30, 1991,
Fikes, R.E. and Nilsson, N.J., “STIRPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving,” Artificial Intelligence 2(3/4), 189–208, 1971.
Fisher, F.M., “A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models,” Econometrica, 38, 73–92, 1970.
Galles, D. and Pearl, J., “Testing Identifiability of Causal Effects,” in P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence11, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 185–195, 1995.
Gärdenfors, P., Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
Geffner, H.A., Default Reasoning: Causal and Conditional Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
Ginsberg, M.L., “Counterfactuals”, Artificial Intelligence, 30, 35–79, 1986.
Goldszmidt, M. and Darwiche, A., “Action networks: A framework for reasoning about actions and change under uncertainty,” in R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-94), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 136–144, 1994.
Goldszmidt, M. and Pearl, J., “Rank-based systems: A simple approach to belief revision, belief update, and reasoning about evidence and actions,” in B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 661–672, October1992.
Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A., “On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it,” in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, Boston, MA, 387–394, 1991.
Koopman, T.C. and Reiersol, O., “The identification of structural characteristics,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 165–181, 1950.
Kushmerick, N., Hanks, S., and Weld, D., “An algorithm for probabilistic planning,” Technical Report 93–06-03, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, 1993.
Lewis D., Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1973.
Lewis, D., “Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities,” Philosophical Review, 85, 297–315, 1976.
Levi, I., “Iteration of conditionals and the Ramsey test,” Synthese, 76, 49–81, 1988.
Pearl, J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligence Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
Pearl, J., “From Conditional Oughts to Qualitative Decision Theory” in D. Heckerman and A. Mamdani (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington, D.C., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 12–20, July 1993.
Pearl, J., “Graphical models, causality, and intervention,” Statistical Science, 8 (3), 266–273, 1993.
Pearl, J., “From Adams’ conditionals to default expressions, causal conditionals, and counterfactuals,” in E. Eells and B. Skyrms (Eds.), Probability and Conditionals, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 47–74, 1994.
Pearl, J., “A probabilistic calculus of actions,” in R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-94), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 454–462, 1994.
Pearl, J., “Causal diagrams for experimental research,” Biometrika 82 (4), 669–710, December, 1995.
Pearl, J. and Robins, J., “Probabilistic evaluation of sequential plans from causal models with hidden variables,” in P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence11, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 444–453, 1995.
Poole, D., “On the comparison of theories: Preferring the most specific explanations,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), Los Angeles, CA, 144–147, 1985.
Rubin, D.B., “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701, 1974.
Simon, H., “Causal ordering and identifiability,” in W.C. Hood and T.C. Koopmans (Eds.), Studies in Econometric Method, New York, NY, Chapter 3, 1953.
Sobel, M.E., “Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models,” Psychometrika, 55(3), 495–515, 1990.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Schienes, R., Causation, Prediction, and Search, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
Strotz, R.H. and Wold, H.O.A., “Recursive versus nonrecursive systems: An attempt at synthesis,” Econometrica 28, 417–427, 1960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearl, J. (1997). Causation, Action, and Counterfactuals. In: Dalla Chiara, M.L., Doets, K., Mundici, D., van Benthem, J. (eds) Logic and Scientific Methods. Synthese Library, vol 259. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0487-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0487-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4786-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0487-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive