Advertisement

Determination of the Material Intrinsic Length Scale of Gradient Plasticity Theory

  • George Z. Voyiadjis
  • Rashid Abu Al-Rub
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 114)

Abstract

The enhanced strain-gradient plasticity theories formulate a constitutive framework on the continuum level that is used to bridge the gap between the micromechanical plasticity and the classical continuum plasticity. To assess the size effects it is indispensable to incorporate an intrinsic material length parameter into the constitutive equations. However, the full utility of gradient-type theories hinges on one’s ability to determine the constitutive length-scale parameter. The classical continuum plasticity is unable to predict properly the evolution of the material flow stress since the local deformation gradients at a given material point are not accounted for. The gradient-based flow stress is commonly assumed to rely on a mixed type of dislocations: statistically stored dislocations (SSDs) and geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs). In this work a micromechanical model to assess the coupling between SSDs and GNDs, which is based on the Taylor’s hardening law, is used to identify the deformation-gradient-related intrinsic length-scale parameter in terms of measurable microstructural physical parameters. This work also presents a method for identifying the length-scale parameter from micro-indentation tests.

Key words

Gradient plasticity Size effects Intrinsic material length-scale Geometrically necessary dislocations Micro-hardness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Stelmashenko, N.A., Walls, M.G., Brown, L.M., and Milman, Y.V. (1993). “Microindentation on W and Mo oriented single crystals: An STM study,” Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 41, 2855–2865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fleck, N.A. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1997). “Strain gradient plasticity,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 33, 295–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gao, H., Huang, Y., and Nix, W.D. (1999). “Modeling plasticity at the micrometer scale,” Naturwissenschaften 86, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Poole, W.J., Ashby, M.F., and Fleck, N.A. (1996). “Micro-hardness of annealed and work-hardened copper polycrystals,” Scripta Materialia, 34, 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Nix, W.D. and Gao, H. (1998). “Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: A law for strain gradient plasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    McElhaney, KW., Valssak, J.J., and Nix, W.D. (1998). “Determination of indenter tip geometry and indentation contact area for depth sensing indentation experiments,” J. Mater. Res., 13, 1300–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Begley, M.R. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1998). “The mechanics of size-dependent indentation,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46, 2049–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Voyiadjis, G.Z. and Abu Al-Rub, R.K. (2002). “Thermodynamic formulations for nonlocal coupling of viscoplasticity and anisotropic viscodamage for dynamic localization problems using gradient theory,” Int. J. Plasticity (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bammann, D.J. and Aifantis, E.C. (1982). “On a proposal for a continuum with microstructure,” Acta Mech., 45, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tabor, D. (1951). The hardness of metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Xue, Z., Huang, Y., Hwang, K.C., and Li, M. (2002). “The influence of indenter tip radius on the micro-indentation hardness,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 124, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Z. Voyiadjis
    • 1
  • Rashid Abu Al-Rub
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations