Abstract
The effects of alkyl substituents (R = Me, Et, i-Pr and t-Bu) on the barriers and enthalpies for R—O bond dissociation reactions are examined via highlevel ab initio molecular orbital calculations for the open-shell systems, R—OCH2• and R—OC(SCH3)2•. To assist in the interpretation of the results, R—X bond dissociation energies (BDEs) are also examined in the closedshell systems (X = H, CH3, OCH3, OH and F). The effects of increasing alkylation on the R—O bond dissociation reactions show an unusual and somewhat counterintuitive trend. Specifically, the BDEs broadly increase and the barriers decrease in going from R = Me to R = t-Bu. However, on closer examination, these effects are readily understood in terms of the competing effects of hyperconjugative stabilization of the leaving R• radical and charge-transfer stabilization of the R—O bond. As part of this work, we also show that B3-LYP yields the wrong qualitative trends for the effect of alkyl substituents on the R—O BDEs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
We note that a stability comparison for non-isomeric radicals is not strictly— formally only the stabilities of isomeric species can be directly y compared. Nevertheless, the concept of “stabilities” remains a most useful one for discussing the reactivities of non-isomeric species once this qualification is recognized.
See, for example: J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963), p. 153.
A. A. Zavitsas J. Chem. Ed. 78, 417–419 (2001)
N. Matsunaga, D. W. Rogers and A. A. Zavitsas, J. Org. Chem. 68, 3158–3172 (2003).
M. L. Coote, A. Pross and L. Radom, Org. Lett., in press (2003).
M. L. Coote and L. Radom, Macromolecules, in press (2003).
J. Chiefari, Y. K. B. Chong, F. Ercole, J. Krstina, J. Jeffery, T. P. T. Le, R. T. A. Mayadunne, G. F. Meijs, C. L. Moad, G. Moad, E. Rizzardo and S.H. Thang. Macromolecules 31, 5559–5562 (1998).
W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v. R. Schleyer, and J. A. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory (Wiley, New York, 1986).
W. Koch, M. C. Holthausen, A Chemist’s Guide to Denisty Functional Theory Weinheim, 2000).
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmaim, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 98, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, R. D. Amos, A. Bernhardsson, A. Berning, P. Celani, D. L. Cooper, M. J. O. Deegan, A. J. Dobbyn, F. Eckert, C. Hampel, G. Hetzer, T. Korona, R. Lindh, A. W. Lloyd, S. J. McNicholas, F. R. Manby, W. Meyer, M. E. Mura, A. Nicklass, P. Palmieri, R. Pitzer, G. Rauhut, M. Schütz, H. Stoll, A. J. Stone, R. Tarroni, and T. Thorsteinsson, MOLPRO 2000.6, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1999.
J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J. D. Watts, M. Nooijen, N. Oliphant, S. A. Perera, P. G. Szalay, W. J. Lauderdale, S. A. Kucharski, S. R. Gwaltney, S. Beck, A. Balková, D. E. Bernholdt, K. K. Baeck, P. Rozyczko, H. Sekino, C. Hober, and R. J. Bartlett, ACES II, Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainsville, 1992.
A. P. Scott and L. Radom, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 16502–16513 (1996).
D. J. Henry, M. B. Sullivan and L. Radom, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4849–4860 (2003).
A. Nicolaides, A. Rauk, M. N. Glukhovtsev and L. Radom, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 17460–17464 (1996).
P. J. Linstrom and W. G. Mallard, Eds. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database No. 69 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 2003), http://webbook.nist.gov.
C.-C. Chen and J. W. Bozzelli, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 4531–4546 (2003).
S. J. Blanksby and G. B. Ellison, Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 255–263 (2003).
Y.-R. Luo, Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003).
A. Pross, Theoretical and Physical Principles of Organic Reactivity (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1995).
Situations in which the bond energy is dominated by resonance between the covalent and ionic contributions have been named “charge-shift bonding” by Shaik, Hiberty and co-workers. For more detailed discussions of this effect, see for example: (a) S. Shaik, P. Maitre, G. Sini and P. C. Hiberty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 7861–7866 (1992)
J. M. Galbraith, E. Blank, S. Shaik, and P. C. Hiberty, Chem. Eur. J. 6, 2425–2434 (2000)
(c) A. Shurki, P. C. Hiberty and S. Shaik, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 822–834 (1999).
(a) M. G. Evans, J. Gergely and E. C. Seaman, J. Polym. Sci. 3, 866–879 (1948)
(b) M. G. Evans, Disc. Faraday Soc. 2, 271–279 (1947).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coote, M.L., Pross, A., Radom, L. (2004). Understanding Alkyl Substituent Effects in R-O Bond Dissociation Reactions in Open- and Closed-Shell Systems. In: Brändas, E.J., Kryachko, E.S. (eds) Fundamental World of Quantum Chemistry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0448-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0448-9_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6687-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0448-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive