Skip to main content
  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

I show that the two most important conceptual advances in epistemology made by Karl Popper, namely, invalidation (1935) and evolutionary epistemology (1972), though apparently unrelated, fit very precisely together if one applies an improved generalized evolutionary paradigm in which the extinctions are included as chance “mutations” of the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker L. 2002. Repeated Blows. Sci Amer. 286, 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D.T. 1974. Evolutionary Epistemology, in The Philosophy of Karl Popper, P.A. Schilpp, ed., La Salle: Open Court, v. 1, pp. 413–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich A. and Ne’eman Y. 1989. Serendipity as a Source of Evolutionary Progress in Science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20, pp. 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich A. 1993. Scientific Discovery — Logic and Tinkering. SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 281

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickey M.E. and Gordon B. 1983. Drugs for Mental Illness. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ne’eman Y. 1998. The sophism which ushered in the Age of Information Technology. In Theory and Practice in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (Hebrew), R. Stavy and D. Tirosh, (Eds.), Tel Aviv University School of Education, Tel Aviv, pp. 1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ne’eman Y. 1999. Order out of Randomness: Science and Human Society in a Generalized Theory of Evolution (Hebrew). Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakibbutz Hame’uchad, Tel Aviv, 112 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. 1935. Logik der Forschung. English version, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. 1972. Objective Knowledge. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre E. 1980. From X-rays to Quarks. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serway R.A., Moses C. and Moyer C.A. 1997. Modern Physics. Saunders College and Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton S.T. and Rex A. 1993. Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Saunders College and Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ne’eman, Y. (2004). Evolutionary Epistemology and Invalidation. In: Wasser, S.P. (eds) Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Horizons. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0443-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0443-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6457-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0443-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics