Skip to main content

Epistemological and Methodological Concerns of Feminist Social Scientists

  • Chapter
Critical Rationalism, the Social Sciences and the Humanities

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 162))

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

Feminist social scientists have been, and still are, facing special epistemological and methodological problems. Critical Rationalism offers some basic insights that could be very helpful to them in these concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agassi, Joseph (1985), Technology: Philosophical and Social Aspects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph (1987), `Methodological Individualism and Institutional individualism’, in: Agassi and Jarvie, 1987, pp. 119–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph and Judith Buber Agassi (1987), `Sexism in Science’ (review of Evelyn Fox Keller, Reflections on Gender and Science), Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph and I.C. Jarvie, eds. (1987), Rationality: The Critical View. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1974), `Objectivity in the Social Sciences’, in: R.J. Seeger and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1982), Review article of Cynthia B. Lloyd and Beth T. Niemi, The Economics of Sex Differentials, in: Technology and Culture, vol. 23, pp. 688–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1983), Review article of Elizabeth E. Wolgast, Equality and the Rights of Women, in: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1986) `Beyond Marxism: Problems in Feminist Research’, (in Hebrew) Nogah, vol. 12, pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1989), `Theories of Gender Equality: Lessons from the Israeli Kibbutz’, Gender and Society, vol. 3/2, pp. 160–186. Reprinted in Judith Lorber and Susan A. Farrell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1991), `The Feminist Challenge to the Sociology of Work’, The Polish Sociological Bulletin,No. 2(90), pp. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber (1992), `Change Research or Action Research: a Promising Methodological Tool, that Combines Applied Sociology with Empirical Research in Organizations’, Methodology and Science, Vol. 25, pp. 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Judith Buber and Joseph Agassi (1985), `The Ethics and Politics of Autonomy: Walter Kaufmann’s Contribution’, Methodology and Science, vol. 18, pp. 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Hans (1978), Traktat über Rationale Praxis. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banton, Michael (1977), The Idea of Race. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Werner (1985), `Critical Theory: The Frankfurt School and Its Influence on Culture and Politics’, in: Joachimides et al.,1985, pp. 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Werner (1992), `Der Beitrag des Kritischen Rationalismus zur Ideologiekritik der Gegenwart’, in: Kruntorad, 1992, pp. 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, William and John Wettersten (1984), Learning from Error: Karl Popper’s Psychology of Learning, La Salle, Ill: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Laurence A. (1982), The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Laurence A. (1986), Methodology for a New Microeconomics: the Critical Foundations. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Laurence A., (1989), The Method of Economic Model Building: Methodology After Samuelson. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, Lorraine (1991), What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Yehuda and Joseph Agassi, (1976), Paranoia: A Study in Diagnosis, Boston Studies, in the Philosophy of Science, vol 50, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest (1974), Legitimation of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gellner, Ernest (1988), Plough, Sword, Book: The Structure of Human History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E.H., (1961), Art and Illusion. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A., (1949), Individualism and the Economic Order. London: Routledges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John A. and I.C., Jarvie (1992), Transition to Modernity: Essays on Power, Wealth and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, I.C., (1972), Concepts and Society. London: Routledges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, I.C., (1986a), `Popper on the Difference Between the Natural and the Social Sciences’, in: Jarvie, 1986b, pp. 70–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, I.C. (1986b), Thinking About Society, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 93, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachimides, C.M. et al.,eds. (1985), German Art in the Twentieth Century: Painting and Sculpture 1905–1985. London: Royal Academy of Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klappholz, Kurt, and Joseph Agassi (1959), `Methodological Prescriptions in Economics’, Economica, vol. 26, pp. 60–74. Spanish transl. in: Revista de Economica, vol. 78–79, 1963, pp. 259–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in D.R. Kamerschen (ed.), Readings in Microeconomics, Cleveland and New York: World Publn. Co., 1967, pp. 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, Noretta (1974), `On Popper’s Philosophy of Social Science’, in: Schaffner and Cohen, 1974, pp. 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruntorad, Paul, ed. (1992), A. E.I.O. U. Mythos Gegenwart: Der östreichische Beitrag. Wien: Östreichischer Bundesverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith and Susan A Farrell, eds. (1991), The Social Construction of Gender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage pp. 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, Timothy (1987), `Methodological Individualism: The Essential Ellipsis of rational Choice Theory’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, John, ed. (1973), Modes of Individualism and Collectivism. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. (1945), The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledges. Popper, Karl R. (1957), The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. (1993), `The Best World We Have Yet Had’, in Urban, 1993, pp. 201–220, esp. pp. 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, Andrea L. (1993), `Feminist Methodology? A Reassessment’, Contemporary Sociology, vol. 22, pp. 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, Gerard (1992), `Social Contract, Democracy and Freedom’, in: Hall and Jarvie, 1992, pp. 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Edward, James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception,New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit, with Lynn, Davidman (1992), Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Janet Radcliffe (1970), The Sceptical Feminist. London: Routledges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassower, Raphael (1993), Knowledge without Expertise. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, Kenneth E. and R.S., Cohen, eds. (1974), PSA, 1972, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, Michael (1991), In the Wake of Galileo. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, Colin (1993), Popper’s Views on Natural and Social Science. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G.R., In conversation with leading thinkers of our time, (1993), End of Empire: The Demise of the Soviet Union. Washington, DC: The American University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, John, (1987), `Epistemology and Politics’, in: Agassi and Jarvie, 1987, pp. 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John R. (1992), The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J.O. (1967), `Testing an Interpretation Within a Session’, Intl. J. Psycho-Anal, vol. 48, pp. 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J.O. (1990), Philosophy of the Social Sciences I: A Metascientific Introduction. Aldershot: Averbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalk, Sue Rosenberg and Janice Gordon-Kelter, eds. (1992), Revolutions in Knowledge: Feminism in the Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agassi, J.B. (1995). Epistemological and Methodological Concerns of Feminist Social Scientists. In: Jarvie, I.C., Laor, N. (eds) Critical Rationalism, the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 162. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0441-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0441-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4430-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0441-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics