Advertisement

Doing Without Happenings: Three Theories of Action

  • David-Hillel Ruben
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 266)

Abstract

There seems to be a distinction of some sort between my actions on the one hand, like my bending my finger and my raising my arm, and mere ‘passive’ events that occur to my body on the other, like my finger’s bending and my arm’s rising. My finger can bend without my bending it; my arm can rise without me raising it. What are actions, if not events?

Keywords

Proper Part Token Action Folk Psychology Conceptual Content Representational State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, Frederick and Alfred Mele (1989), “The Role of Intention in Intentional Action,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, Kent (1980), “Actions Are Not Events,” Mind 89.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, Kent (1986), “A Representational Theory of Action” in M. Brand and R. Harnish (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, John (1983), “Agent-causation,” Mind XCII.Google Scholar
  5. Brand, Myles (1984), Intending and Acting. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Candlish, Stewart (1984), “Inner and Outer Basic Actions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. LXXXIV.Google Scholar
  7. Chisholm, Roderick (1966), “Freedom and Action” in Keith Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. New York, Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Crane, Tim and Hugh Mellor (1990), “There is No Question of Physicalism,” Mind 99.Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, Alvin (1970), A Theory of Action. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hamlyn, David (1990), In and Out of the Black Box: On the Philosophy of Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Hinton, J.M. (1973), Experiences. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hornsby, Jennifer (1980), Actions. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Hursthouse, Rosalind (1991), “Arational Action,” The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVIII.Google Scholar
  14. McCann, Hugh (1974), “Volition and Basic Action,” Philosophical Review.Google Scholar
  15. McDowell, John (1982), “Criteria, Defeasability, and Knowledge,” Proceedings of the British Academy 68.Google Scholar
  16. Mele, Alfred (1992), Springs of Action. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. O’Shaughnessy, Brian (1980), The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Peacocke, Christopher (1992), A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, Mass., Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Snowdon, Paul (1980–1), “Perception, Vision, and Causation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, Richard (1966), Action and Purpose. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Thalberg, Irving (1976), “How Does Agent Causality Work?” in M. Brand and D. Walton (eds.), Action Theory. Dordrecht, Holland, Reidel.Google Scholar
  22. Velleman, J. David (1992), “What Happens When Someone Acts?,” Mind 101 (403).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wakefield, Jerome and Hubert Dreyfus (1992), “Intentionality and the Phenomenology of Action” in E. Lepore and Robert van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and His Critics. Oxford, Blackwell,Google Scholar
  24. von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963), Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David-Hillel Ruben
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of EconomicsUK

Personalised recommendations