Skip to main content

Doing Without Happenings: Three Theories of Action

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 266))

Abstract

There seems to be a distinction of some sort between my actions on the one hand, like my bending my finger and my raising my arm, and mere ‘passive’ events that occur to my body on the other, like my finger’s bending and my arm’s rising. My finger can bend without my bending it; my arm can rise without me raising it. What are actions, if not events?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Frederick and Alfred Mele (1989), “The Role of Intention in Intentional Action,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Kent (1980), “Actions Are Not Events,” Mind 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Kent (1986), “A Representational Theory of Action” in M. Brand and R. Harnish (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, John (1983), “Agent-causation,” Mind XCII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Myles (1984), Intending and Acting. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlish, Stewart (1984), “Inner and Outer Basic Actions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. LXXXIV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick (1966), “Freedom and Action” in Keith Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. New York, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Tim and Hugh Mellor (1990), “There is No Question of Physicalism,” Mind 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin (1970), A Theory of Action. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlyn, David (1990), In and Out of the Black Box: On the Philosophy of Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J.M. (1973), Experiences. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, Jennifer (1980), Actions. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind (1991), “Arational Action,” The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Hugh (1974), “Volition and Basic Action,” Philosophical Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John (1982), “Criteria, Defeasability, and Knowledge,” Proceedings of the British Academy 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, Alfred (1992), Springs of Action. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, Brian (1980), The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, Christopher (1992), A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, Mass., Bradford Books, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, Paul (1980–1), “Perception, Vision, and Causation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Richard (1966), Action and Purpose. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Irving (1976), “How Does Agent Causality Work?” in M. Brand and D. Walton (eds.), Action Theory. Dordrecht, Holland, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. David (1992), “What Happens When Someone Acts?,” Mind 101 (403).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, Jerome and Hubert Dreyfus (1992), “Intentionality and the Phenomenology of Action” in E. Lepore and Robert van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and His Critics. Oxford, Blackwell,

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963), Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruben, DH. (1997). Doing Without Happenings: Three Theories of Action. In: Holmström-Hintikka, G., Tuomela, R. (eds) Contemporary Action Theory Volume 1: Individual Action. Synthese Library, vol 266. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0439-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0439-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4914-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0439-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics