Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 10))

  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reports on experiences in verifying synchronous circuit designs using the ReDuX term rewriting laboratory (Bündgen, 1993; Bündgen et al., 1996c; Bündgen and Lauterbach, 1996a). For this purpose a technique is presented that transforms the proof requirements for the verification of a processor design at gate level to purely equational problems. This technique has been successfully applied to the verification of two processors of the Sparrow family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkeley: 1992, `Berkeley Logic Interchange Format (BLIF)’. University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berregeb, N., A. Bouhoula, and M. Rusinowitch: 1996, `Automated Verification by Induction with Associative-Commutative Operators’. In: R. Alur and T. A. Hen-zinger (eds.): Computer Aided Verification (LNCS 1102). pp. 220–231, Springer-Verlag. (Proc. CAV’96, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, July/August 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubeck, T., U. Kebschull, and W. Rosenstiel: 1993, `— Sparrow — Ein Mikroprozessor-Entwurfs-und Ausbildungssystem’. Technical Report 93–07, WilhelmSchickard-Institut, Universität Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen. (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bündgen, R.: 1993, `Reduce the Redex ReDuX’. In: C. Kirchner (ed.): Rewriting Techniques and Applications (LNCS 690). pp. 446–450, Springer-Verlag. (Proc. RTA’93, Montreal, Canada, June 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blindgen, R., M. Göbel, and W. Küchlin: 1996a, `Strategy Compliant Multi-Threaded Term Completion’. Journal of Symbolic Computation 21 (4–6), 475–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blindgen, R., W. Küchlin, and W. Lauterbach: 1996b, `Verification of the Sparrow Processor’. In: IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems. IEEE Press, pp. 86–93. (Proc. ECBS’96, Friedrichshafen, Germany, March 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bündgen, R. and W. Lauterbach: 1996a, `Combining Reductions and Computations in ReDuX’. In: M. Wirsing and M. Nivat (eds.): Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology (LNCS 1101). pp. 633–636, Springer Verlag. (Proc. AMAST’96, Munich, Germany, July 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bündgen, R. and W Lauterbach: 1996b, `Experiments with Partial Evaluation Domains for Rewrite Specifications’. In: M. Haveraaen, O. Owe, and 0.-J. Dahl (eds.): Recent Trends in Data Type Specifications (LNCS 1130). pp. 125–142, Springer Verlag. (WADT’95, Oslo, Norway, September 1995, selected papers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bündgen, R., W. Lauterbach, and W. Küchlin: 1995, `A License to Fly: Verifying the Sparrow-0 Processor’. Technical Report 95–04, Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut, Universität Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bündgen, R., C. Sinz, and J. Walter: 1996c, `ReDuX 1.5: New Facets of Rewriting’. In: H. Ganzinger (ed.): Rewriting Techniques and Applications (LNCS 1103). pp. 412–415, Springer-Verlag. (Proc. RTA’96, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, July 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, M. S., J. P. Privitera, and C. K. W.: 1987, `Application of Term Rewriting Techniques to Hardware Verification’. In: 24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference. pp. 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geser, A. and W. Küchlin: 1997, `Structured Formal Verification of a Fragment of the IBM 390 Clock Chip’. In: Technical Report 97–50, RISC Linz Report Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J. A., T. Winkler, J. Meseguer, K. Futatsugi, and J.-P. Jouannaud: 1993, `Introducing OBJ’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, J.: 1985, `Refutational Theorem Proving using Term-Rewriting Systems’. Artificial Intelligence 25, 255–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Jr, W. A.: 1989, `Microprocessor Design Verification’. Journal of Automated Reasoning 5 (4), 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D. and M. Subramaniam: 1996, `Mechanically Verifying a Family of Multiplier Circuits’. In: R. Alur and T. A. Henzinger (eds.): Computer Aided Verification (LNCS 1102). pp. 135–146, Springer-Verlag. (Proc. CAV’96, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, July/August 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebschull, U., E. Schubert, and W. Rosenstiel: 1992, `Multilevel Logic Synthesis Based on Functional Decision Diagrams’. In: Proc. EDAC 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, U. and T. Nipkow: 1988, `Unification in Boolean Rings’. Journal of Automated Reasoning 4, 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendran, P. and J. Stillman: 1989, `Formal Verification of the Sobel Image Processing Chip’. In: G. Birtwistle and P. A. Subrahmanyam (eds.): Current Trends in Hardware Verification and Automated Theorem Proving. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 92–127.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, W. and E. Schubert: 1995, ‘Praktikum VLSI-Design mit VHDL, WS 95/96’. Course notes for the VLSI desing laboratoy at the University of Tübingen (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekar, R. C. and M. K. Srivas: 1989, `Formal Verification of a Microprocessor Using Equational Techniques’. In: G. Birtwistle and P. A. Subrahmanyam (eds.): Current Trends in Hardware Verification and Automated Theorem Provin. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 171–217.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Staunstrup, J., S. J. Garland, and J. V. Guttag: 1992, `Mechanized Verification of Cir-cuit Descriptions using the Larch Prover’. In: V. Stavridou, T. F Melham, and R. T. Boute (eds.): Theorem Provers in Circuit Design. pp. 277–299, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. H.: 1936, `The Theory of Representations of Boolean Algebras’. Trans. American Math. Society 40, 37–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thole, P., U. Kebschull, E. Schubert, and W. Rosenstiel: 1993, `The design and implementation of an educational computer system based on FPGAs’. In: Proc. 4th Eurochip Workshop on VLSI Design Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • XILINX- 1991, `XILINX The Programmable Gate Array Data Book’. XILINX Inc., 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, CA 95124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bündgen, R. (1998). Rewrite Based Hardware Verification with Redux. In: Bibel, W., Schmitt, P.H. (eds) Automated Deduction — A Basis for Applications. Applied Logic Series, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0437-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0437-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5052-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0437-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics