Skip to main content

Bioethics and Communicative Ethics

  • Chapter
Bioethics: Asian Perspectives

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((ASBP,volume 80))

  • 633 Accesses

Abstract

This paper concerns the newly raised questions of medical ethics in the application of high technologies, including biotechnology. I address the limitations in applying the principle-based argumentation that has been popular thus far in bioethical discussions. I also suggest that we shift the discussion of medical ethics from the level of the ethics of institutions or the ethics of convention to the level of so-called “post-conventional ethics”, the communicative ethics. In encountering the threat to life and the environment in the contemporary era of science and technology, justice is not enough. We need to reconstruct bioethics (including medical ethics) based on mutual respect and co-responsibility between equal moral subjects above the level of institutions and functional social systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Oriental Classics

Modern Publications

  • Apel, K.-O., Boehler, D. and Rebel, K. (Hrsg.) (1984). Praktische Philosophie/Ethik. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Hans (1985). ‘Technik, Ethik and biogenetische Kunst: Betrachtungen zur neuen Schoepferrolle des Menschen.’ In: Rainer Floehl (Hrsg.), Genforschung-Fluch oder Segen? ( 1–15 ). Muenchen: Schweitzer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiwata, Ryuji and Sakai Akio (1994). ‘The physician-patient relationship and medical ethics in Japan,’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1), 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jong Yul (1986). ‘Corporate ethics and medical ethics,’ The Korean Hospital AssociationMagazine, 7, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jung Hi (1998). ‘Ontological research on biofeminism - Consideration of new human model based upon the conscious in the Buddhism and Taoism.’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Ewha Woman’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Boo Young (1995). ‘Professional responsibility of the physician.’ In: Medical Ethics in Modern Society (pp. 122–133). Asan Sahoebokchi Saupchedan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Sook In (1998). ‘Feminist interpretation on relational ethics in Confucianism.’ In: Feminist Ethics Theoryand Application.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariner, Wendy K. (1995). ‘Business vs. medical ethics: Conflicting standards for managed care,’ Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23, 238ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, Alan (1996). ‘Legal and ethical myth about informed consent,’ Archives of Internal Medicine,156(22), 2522 ff. Moores v. Lucas,405, So. 2d1022 (Fla. 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweny, Charles (1994). ‘Bioethics in the developing countries-Ethics of scarcity and sacrifice,’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 20, 170ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Seung Seo (1988). ‘Medical ethics in legal text,’ The Korea Hospital Association Magazine, 5, 57ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Un-Jong (2000). Law and Bioethics in the Age of Biotechnology. Seoul: Ewha University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purtilo (1994). ‘Medicine in transition - Emerging ethical issues in the global village’, Annals of the Academy of Medicine (Singapore), 23(3), 439ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reust, Carin E. (1996). ‘Family involvement in medical decision making,’ Family Medicine 28 (10), 3945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, Susan (1992). ‘Feminist ethics and medical ethics.’ In: Shogan, Debra (Ed.), A Reader in Feminist Ethics (pp. 42ff.). Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Ok Hi (1995). ‘Traditional ideology in the Orient and the prospects of the Korean feminist philosophy.’ In: Han’guk Josongchuihak (The Korean Feminist Philosophy). Hanwool Academy: Feminist Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Ok Hi (1998). ‘Feminist ethics from the life of Korean women’s viewpoint.’ In: Feminist Ethics -Theory and Application, Korean Association of Women’s Studies, Fall Term Seminar, June 13, Data, 20ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, David R. (1996). ‘Narrowing the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of medical ethics.’ Academic Medicine, 71(3), 228ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Janet Farrell (1996). ‘Communitive ethics in medicine: The physician-patient relationship.’ In: Susan M. Wolf (Ed.), Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction ( 184–215 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Rosemarie (1997). Feminist Approach to Bioethics. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udovicki, Jasninka (1993). ‘Justice and care in close relationship,’ Hypatia 8 (3), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Who and Unecef (1987). International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma Ata, USSR, September 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pak, UJ. (2003). Bioethics and Communicative Ethics. In: Qiu, RZ. (eds) Bioethics: Asian Perspectives. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6509-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0419-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics