Abstract
Socrates famously asked: “Is that which is holy loved by the gods because it is holy, or is it holy because it is loved by the gods”?2 Leibniz opens up one of his more important essays on moral philosophy, the Méditation sur la notion commune de la justice with a reformulation of this question. He states: “It is agreed that whatever God wills is good and just. But there remains the question whether it is good and just because God wills it or whether God wills it because it is good and just: in other words, whether justice and goodness are arbitrary or whether they belong to the necessary and eternal truths about the nature of things, as do numbers and proportions”.3 For Leibniz, this is a crucial question. It is because they fail in addressing this issue correctly, he argues, that the most renowned moral and political theorists of his day end up with a philosophically confused and morally repulsive doctrine.4 In the research literature, this “repulsive” doctrine has now come to be known as “voluntarism,” and Pufendorf is generally accepted as one of its most central and clear-cut defenders in the early-modern period.
I am grateful to Tim Hochstrasse, Simo Knuuttila, Kari Saastamoinen and Jerome Schneewind for constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Primary Sources
Barbeyrac, Jean, Écrits de droit et de morale. Edited by Simone Goyard-Fabre. Paris, 1996.
Barbeyrac, Jean, Le Droit de la Nature, et des Gens. 2 vols. Basel, 1750.
Barbeyrac, Jean, Les Devoirs de l’Homme et du Citoyen. (Facsimile of the London edition of 1712.) Caen, 1984.
Böhmer, Christian, Programma Disputationibus XII Pufendorflanis. Helmstadt, 1709.
Burlamaqui, Jean-Jacques, Les Principes du Droit Naturel. Caen, 1989.
Hobbes, Thomas, De Cive. Edited by Howard Warrender. Oxford, 1983.
Leibniz, Wilhelm Gottfried, “Méditation sur la notion commune de la justice”. In Rechtsphilosophisches aus Leibnizens ungedruckten schriften. Edited by Georg Mollat. Leipzig, 1885.
Leibniz, Wilhelm Gottfried, Essais de Théodicée. Amsterdam, 1747.
Leibniz, Wilhelm Gottfried, Opera omnia. Edited by Ludvig Dutens. Geneva, 1768.
Leibniz, Wilhelm Gottfried, Political Writings. Edited by Patrick Riley. Cambridge, 1988.
Pufendorf, Samuel, De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo. Edited by Frank Böhling. Berlin, 1998.
Pufendorf, Samuel, De Officio Hominis et Civis Libri Duo. Edited by Gerald Hartung. Berlin, 1997.
Pufendorf, Samuel, De Officio Hominis et Civis Libri Duo. Vol 2. Translated by C. H. Oldfather, and W. A. Oldfather. Oxford, 1934.
Pufendorf, Samuel, On the Duty of Man and Citizen. Edited by James Tully. Translated by Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge, 1991.
Vattel, Emmerich de, “Essai sur le Fondement du Droit Naturel, et sur le Premier Principe de l’Obligation où se Trouvent les Hommes d’en Observer les Lois”. In Vattel, Le Droit des Gens,ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle. Edited by M. P. Pradier-Fodéré. Paris, 1863.
Secondary Sources
Hochstrasser, Tim, J., “Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac”. In Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law. Edited by Knud Haakonssen. Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1999, 381–400.
Hochstrasser, Tim, J., “The Claims of Conscience: Natural Law Theory, Obligation, and Resistance in the Huguenot Diaspora”. In New Essays on the Political Thought of the Huguenots of the Réfuge. Edited by John Laursen. Leiden, 1995, 15–51.
Korkman, Petter, “Descartes, le droit naturel, et les fondements de la morale moderne”. In L’ésprit de Descartes. Edited by Bernard Bourgeois, and Jacques Havet. Paris, 2000, vol. I, 390–5.
Laurent, Pierre, Pufendorf et la loi naturelle. Paris, 1982.
Meylan, Philippe, Jean Barbeyrac (1674–1744) et les débuts de l’enseignement du droit dans l’ancienne académie de Lausanne, Contribution à l’histoire du droit naturel. Lausanne, 1937.
Palladini, Fiammetta, Samuel Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes, per una reinterpretazione del giusnaturalismo moderno. Bologna, 1990.
Saastamoinen, Kari, The Morality of the Fallen Man — Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law. Helsinki, 1995.
Schneewind, Jerome, “Barbeyrac and Leibniz on Pufendorf’. In Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische frühaufklärung, Werk und einfluss eines deutschen burgers der gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 jahren (1694–1994.) Edited by Fiammetta Palladini and Gerald Hartung. Berlin, 1996, 181–9.
Schneewind, Jerome, “Locke’s Moral Philosophy”. In Cambridge Companion to Locke. Edited by Vere Chappell. Cambridge, 1994, 199–225.
Schneewind, Jerome, “Voluntarism and the foundations of ethics”. Proceedings and addresses of the APA, vol. 70.2 (1996): 25–41.
Schneewind, Jerome, The Invention of Autonomy, a History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, 1998.
Sève, René, Leibniz et l’école modeme du droit naturel. Paris, 1989.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Korkman, P. (2003). Voluntarism and Moral Obligation: Barbeyrac’s Defence of Pufendorf Revisited. In: Hochstrasser, T.J., Schröder, P. (eds) Early Modern Natural Law Theories. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 186. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0391-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0391-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6403-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0391-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive