Skip to main content

Fostering Compatible Forest Resource Management: The Conditional Nature of Social Acceptability

  • Chapter
Compatible Forest Management

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 8))

Abstract

For years, public and private resource management organizations have sought to implement sustainable policies and programs that achieve various forest management goals; yet success has proven elusive. Although such efforts have been marked by significant investments in assessing the biophysical and economic aspects of proposals, public opposition often has stymied implementation. One example—and the focus of this book—is reflected in the search for forest management policies and programs that increase the compatibility between wood production and other forest uses and values. Efforts to use timber harvesting as part of a forest management strategy that incorporates commodity production with a host of other purposes, from fire control to biodiversity enhancment, have been engulfed in controversy. At their core, such conflicts reveal the importance of social acceptability, which implies a sufficient level of public understanding and accord to permit policy implementation. Such judgments ultimately affect all forestland management, irrespective of tenure, although they are particularly salient at present with regard to public lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birch, T.A. 1996. Private forest-land owners of the United States, 1994. Resource Bulletin NE-134. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 183 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blahna, D.J., and Yonts-Shepard, S. 1989. Public involvement in resource planning: toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society and Natural Resources, 2: 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J.C. 2000. Public perceptions of clearcutting. Journal of Forestry, 98(12): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J.C., Nepal, S.K., Brooks, R.T., Jr., and Larsen, M.D. 1994. Forestry community or granfalloon? Journal of Forestry, 92(9): 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J.C., Nepal, S.K., Brooks, R.T., Jr., and Larsen, M.D. 1997. In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south NIPF owners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 21(1): 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, W. 1991. Managing transitions: making the most of change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 130 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.J., Driver, B.L., and McConnell, C. 1978. The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: background and application. In: G.H. Lund, V.J. LaBau, P.F. Ffolliott, and D.W. Robinson (Tech. coords.), Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources: proceedings of the workshop (pp. 73–84). General Technical Report RM-55. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.C., and Daniel, T.C 1986. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. Forest Science, 32: 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. 1993. “Socially acceptable” forestry: What does it imply for ecosystem management? Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 8(4): 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. 1996. A definition of “social acceptability” in ecosystem management. In: M.W. Brunson, L.E. Kruger, C.B. Tyler, and S.A. Schroeder (Eds.), Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: workshop proceedings (pp. 7–16). General Technical Report PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M.W., and Reiter, D.K. 1996. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest. Journal of Environmental Management, 46: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M.W., and Shelby, B. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: How does “new forestry” rate? Journal of Forestry, 90(7): 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchfield, J.A., Miller, J.M., Allen, S., Schroeder, R.F., and Miller, T. [In press]. Social implications of alternatives to clearcutting on the Tongass National Forest: an exploratory study of residents’ responses to alternative silvicultural treatments at Hanus Bay. General Technical Report. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 28 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N. 1987. Recreation management: a question of integration. Western Wildlands, 13(1): 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N. 1988. Enhancing recreation opportunities in silvicultural planning. In: W.C. Schmidt (Comp.), Proceedings, Future forests of the Mountain West: a stand culture symposium. (pp. 61–69). General Technical Report INT-243. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N., and Brown, P.J. 1990. The emerging web of integrated resource management. Proceedings of the 1990 IUFRO XIX World Congress, Montreal, Canada. 6: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N., and Gibbons, D.R. 1991. Recreation. In: W.R. Meehan (Ed.), Influences of forest and rangeland on salmonid fishes and their habitat. (Chapter 13 pp. 459–481), Special Publication 19. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N., Koch, R.W., Hogans, M.L., Christensen, H.H., and Hendee, J.C. 1984. The value of roaded, multiple-use areas as recreation sites in three national forests of the Pacific Northwest. Research Paper PNW-319. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 40 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.N., and Stankey, G.H. 1979. The recreation opportunity spectrum: a framework for planning, management, and research. General Technical Report PNW-98. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 32 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J.N., and McCool, D.C. 1996. Staking out the terrain: power and performance among natural resource agencies (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 279 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M. 1974. Conflicts, strategies, and possibilities for consensus in forest land use and management. In: M. Clawson (Ed.), Forest policy for the future: conflict, compromise, consensus (pp. 105–191). Papers and discussions from a forum on forest policy for the future. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 360 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner, H.J., Wallace, M., Burke, S., and Moote, M.A. 1998. Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40: 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K.K., and Bliss, J.C. 2003. It’s a neighborhood now: practicing forestry at the urban fringe. Journal of Forestry, 101(3): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenhaldt, A. 1994. Let the people decide between spinach and broccoli. Governing, 7(10): 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firey, W. 1960. Man, mind, and land: a theory of resource use. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe. 256 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 336 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team [FEMAT]. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of the Interior [et al.]. [Irregular pagination].

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 501 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster, P.H. 1996. Forest aesthetics, biodiversity, and the perceived appropriateness of ecosystem management activities. In: M.W. Brunson, L.E. Kruger, C.B. Tyler, and S.A. Schroeder (Eds.), Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: workshop proceedings (pp. 77–97). General Technical Report PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, R.W., and Thayer, R.L., Jr. 1980. Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty. Landscape Planning, 7(2): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W.L., Mills, W.L., Jr., and Vasan, S. 1997. Nonindustrial private forest landowners in Indiana: are their objectives and attitudes consistent with ecosystem management? In: H.K. Cordell (Ed.), Integrating social science and ecosystem management: a national challenge: proceedings of the conference on integrating social sciences and ecosystem management (pp. 150–155). General Technical Report SRS-17. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, S. 2003. Managing structural and compositional diversity with silviculture. Chapter 4. In: R.A. Monserud, R.W. Haynes, and A.C. Johnson (Eds.), Compatible forest management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. 1994. Problems and prospects for a Forest Service program in the human dimensions of global change. In: K. Geyer, and B. Shindler (Eds.), Breaking the mold: global change, social responsibility, and natural resource management (pp. 23–28). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. 1990. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 302 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakoyannis, C., Shindler, B., and Stankey, G. 2001. Understanding the social acceptability of natural resource decisionmaking processes by using a knowledge base modeling approach. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-518. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 40 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. 2001. What is essential is invisible to the eye: understanding the role of place and social learning in achieving sustainable landscapes. In: S.R.J. Sheppard, and H.W. Harshaw (Eds.), Forest and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics (pp. 173–187). Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom: CABI Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. 1990. Achieving integration in resource planning. In: R. Lang (Ed.), Integrated approaches to planning and management (pp. 27–50). Banff, AB: Banff School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R., Daniels, S.E., and Stankey, G. 1997. Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resources decision making. Society and Natural Resources, 10(6): 577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.G., and Stankey, G.H. 1992. Evaluating institutional arrangements for regulating large watersheds and river basins. In: P.W. Adams, and W.A. Atkinson (Comps.), Watershed resources: balancing environmental, social, political and economic factors in large basins (pp. 30–37). Corvallis, OR: Forest Engineering Department, Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S.F., and Stankey, G.H. 1986. Visitor attitudes toward wilderness fire management policy—1971–84. Research Paper INT-357. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 7 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, D.N. 1995. Barriers and bridges to learning in a turbulent human ecology. In: L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and S.S. Light (Eds.), Barriers & bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 461–485). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S.A. 1995. The role of trust in social networks: formation, function, and fragility. In: J. Craig, E.M. Mattiske, and D.A. Saunders (Eds.), Nature conservation 4: the role of networks (pp. 148–154). Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia: Surrey Beatty and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.C., Steger, M.A.E., Steel, B.S., and Lovrich, N.P. 1992. Citizens, political communication, and interest groups: environmental organizations in Canada and the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger. 225 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plough, A., and Krimsky, S. 1987. The emergence of risk communication studies: social and political context. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12(3–4): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, R., and Silvaggio, T. 2002. National forest management in timber and spotted owl country: a survey of interested people in western Oregon and Washington. Eugene, OR: Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon. 104 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, R.G. 1989. The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management, 13: 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, R.G. 2002. Is scenic beauty a proxy for acceptable management? The influence of environmental attitudes on landscape perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 34(6): 757–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, R.G. [In press]. Aesthetic perceptions of the retention of green trees and down wood in timber harvests. Review draft. 36 p. Ecological Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, R.G., Armstrong, E.T., and Gobster, P.H. 2002. Scenic vistas and the changing policy landscape: visualizing and testing the role of visual resources in ecosystem management. Landscape Journal, 21: 42–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, D. 1995. Managing esthetic values. Journal of Forestry, 93(2): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B. 2000. Landscape-level management: it’s all about context. Journal of Forestry, 98(12): 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., Brunson, M., and Stankey, G.H. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 68 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and Collson, P. 1998. Assessing public preferences for ecosystem management practices. In: D.L. Soden, B.L. Lamb, and J. Tennert (Eds.), Ecosystem management: a social science perspective (pp. 161–174). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and Neburka, J. 1997. Public participation in forest planning: eight attributes of success. Journal of Forestry, 91(7): 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., Peters, J., and Kruger, L. 1994. Social values and acceptability of alternative harvest practices on the Tongass National Forest. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 95 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and Toman, E. 2002. A longitudinal analysis of fuel reduction in the Blue Mountains: public perspectives on the use of prescribed fire and mechanized thinning. Corvallis, OR: Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University. 76 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and Wright, A. 2000. Watershed management in the central Cascades: a study of citizen knowledge and the value of information sources in the lower South Santiam basin. Corvallis, OR: Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University. 90 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, B.J., Bliss, J.C., and Spies, T.A. 2002. Land ownership and landscape structure: a spatial analysis of 66 Oregon Coast Range watersheds. Landscape Ecology, 17(8): 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H. 1976. Wilderness fire policy: an investigation of visitor knowledge and beliefs. Research Paper INT-180. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 17 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H. 1996. Defining the social acceptability of forest management practices and conditions: integrating science and social choice. In: M.W. Brunson, L.E. Kruger, C.B. Tyler, and S.A. Schroeder (Eds.), Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: workshop proceedings (pp. 99–112). General Technical Report PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H., Bormann, B.T., Ryan, C., Shindler, B., Sturtevant, V., Clark, R.N., and Philpot, C. 2003. Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry, 101(1): 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H., and Clark, R.N. 1992. Social aspects of new perspectives in forestry: a problem analysis. Milford, PA: Grey Towers Press. 33 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H., Cole, D.N., Lucas, R.C., Petersen, M.E., and Frissell, S.S. 1985. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. General Technical Report INT-176. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 37 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H., and Shindler B. 1997. Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise, avoiding the peril. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-394. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 21 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F.J., and Sparks, R.E. 1990. Long-term ecological research and the invisible place. BioScience, 40(7): 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.G., and Daniel, T.C. 1984. Prescribed fire: public education and perception. Journal of Forestry, 82: 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J., and Ebreo, A. 1991. Are you thinking what I think you are? A study of actual and estimated goal priorities and decision preferences of resource managers. Society and Natural Resources, 4(2): 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengert, N. 1976. Citizen participation: practice in search of a theory. In: A.E. Utton, W.R.D. Sewell, and T. O’Riordan (Eds.), Natural resources for a democratic society: public participation in decision-making (pp. 23–40). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D.R., and Patterson, M.E. 1996. Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography. Society and Natural Resources, 9(5): 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J.M. 1988. Public lands conflict and resolution: managing national forest disputes. New York: Plenum Press. 263 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J.M., and Yaffee, S.L. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press. 277 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D. 1991. Coming to public judgment: making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. 290 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stankey, G.H., Clark, R.N., Bliss, J. (2003). Fostering Compatible Forest Resource Management: The Conditional Nature of Social Acceptability. In: Monserud, R.A., Haynes, R.W., Johnson, A.C. (eds) Compatible Forest Management. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0309-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0309-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6388-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0309-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics