Abstract
Three methods (membrane filtration, multiple tube fermentation, and chromogenic substrate technology kits manufactured by IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.) are routinely used to measure indicator bacteria for beach water quality. To assess comparability of these methods, quantify within-laboratory variability for each method, and place that variability into context of variability among laboratories using the same method, 22 southern California laboratories participated in a series of intercalibration exercises. Each laboratory processed three to five replicates from thirteen samples, with total coliforms, fecal coliforms or enterococci measured depending on the sample. Results were generally comparable among methods, though membrane filtration appeared to underestimate the other two methods for fecal coliforms, possibly due to clumping. Variability was greatest for the multiple tube fermentation method. For all three methods, within laboratory variability was greater than among laboratories variability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: 1995, 18th ed, Eaton, A.D., Clesceri, L.S., and Greenberg, A.E. (eds.), Washington, D.C.
APHA. See American Public Health Association.
Conover, W.J., and Iman, R.L.: 1981, ‘Rank Transform as a Bridge Between Parametric and Non-parametric Statistics,’ The American Statistician 35, 125.
Cheung, W.H.S., Chang, K.C.K., and Hung, R.P.S.:1991, “Variations in microbial indicator densities in beach waters and health-related assessment of bathing water quality,’ Epidemiol. Infect. 106, 329 – 344.
Eckner, K.F.: 1998, ‘Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the Colilert and Enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern Sweden,’ Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3079–3083.
Edberg, S.C., Allen, M.J. Smith, D.B. and Kriz, N.J.: 1990, ‘Enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from source water by the defined substrate technology,’ Appl. Environ. Microbiol. B, 366 – 369.
Fleisher, J.M.: 1990, ‘The effects of measurement error on previously reported mathematical relationships between indicator organism density and swimming-associated illness: a quantitative estimate of the resulting bias,’ Internat. J. of Epidemiol. 19, 1100 – 1106.
Francy, D.S. and Darner, R.A.: 2000, ‘Comparison of methods for determining Escherichia coli concentrations in recreational waters’ Wat. Res. 24, 2770 – 2778.
Green, B.L., Clausen, E.M. and Litsky, W.: 1977, ‘Two-temperature membrane filter method for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria from chlorinated effluents’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 1259–1264.
Haile, R.W., J.S. Witte, M. Gold, R. Cressey, C. McGee, R.C. Millikan, A. Glasser, N. Harawa, C. Ervin, P. Harmon, J. Harper, J. Dermand, J. Alamillo, K. Barrett, M. Nides and Wang, G.: 1999, ‘The health effects of swimming in ocean water contaminated by storm drain runoff,’ Epidemiol. 10, 355 – 363.
Messer, J.W., and Dufour, A.P.: 1998, ‘A rapid, specific membrane filtration procedure for enumera- tion of enterococci in recreational water,’ Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 678–680.
Natural Resources Defense Council.: 1998, ‘Testing the waters, Has your vacation beach cleaned up its act?’ Vol. 8. p. 145. New York, NY.
Schiff, K.C., Weisberg, S.B. and Dorsey, J.H.: 2001, ‘Microbiological monitoring of marine recreational waters in southern California,’ Environ. Management. 27: 149 – 157.
Schiff, K.C., Morton, J. and Weisberg, S.B.: In press, ‘Retrospective evaluation of shoreline water quality along Santa Monica Bay beaches,’ Mar. Env. Res.
Stasiak, M.C., and Cheng, S.H.: 1991, ‘Coliform detection using membrane filtration and Colilert, and E. coli detection using nutrient AGAR Plus MUG and EC Plus MUG,’ pp. 741–748 in: Proceedings of the Water Quality Technology Conference, Orlando. American Water Works Association, Denver, CO.
Toombs, R.W., and Conner, D.A.: 1980, ‘Proficiency test sample media for single and mixed pure cultures of water pollution indicator bacteria,’ Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40, 883–887.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noble, R.T. et al. (2003). Comparison of Beach Bacterial Water Quality Indicator Measurement Methods. In: Melzian, B.D., Engle, V., McAlister, M., Sandhu, S., Eads, L.K. (eds) Coastal Monitoring through Partnerships. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0299-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0299-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6203-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0299-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive