Skip to main content

Sulphur Nutrition and Oilseed Quality

  • Chapter

Abstract

Oilseed rape has a high requirement for sulphur and is particularly sensitive to any shortfall in sulphur supply. Yield responses of oilseed rape to sulphur supply have been reported in many countries. Soil sulphur content has been found to influence the level of yield response from a site and results indicate that correct sulphur nutrition is critical for double low varieties. An interaction between nitrogen and sulphur has been noted, indicating that there is a requirement to balance application of these nutrients for optimum response. The response of oil content to sulphur application is less consistent than that of yield, but increases in oil content appears more likely where a low sulphur status occurs. Small changes in fatty acid composition may occur. Differences in protein content according to sulphur application are usually small and associated with sulphur deficiency. Content of sulphur bearing amino acids may be reduced at low sulphur conditions.

Sulphur availability has a larger effect on the content of glucosinolates, sulphur containing secondary metabolites, in both the vegetation and the seed of oilseed rape plant. Site and variety type have a large effect on glucosinolate response to sulphur application, with low sulphur or deficient sites and high glucosinolate varieties being associated with the largest increases in glucosinolate content following sulphur application. Glucosinolates have been shown to be associated with biocidal effects, with glucosinolate levels raised by sulphur application being effective in reducing and delaying disease levels. However, glucosinolate levels raised within the plant foliage by sulphur supplementation could not fully substitute for fungicide application in terms of disease control and subsequent effects on yield. External application of glucosinolates allowed greater accuracy in timing and targeting of glucosinolates. Effectiveness against a range of organisms has been demonstrated, although development for use in the commercial situation may be difficult due to health and safetly implications of handling glucosinolate products in this form. Biofumigation, where soil borne pathogens and pests are suppressed by biocidal compounds released during the hydrolysis of glucosinolates during the breakdown of Brassica tissues offers an alternative means of delivery of glucosinolates to the target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmad A and Abdin MZ (2000) Effect of sulphur application on lipid, RNA and fatty acid content in developing seeds of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.). Plant Science 150: 71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angus JF, Gardner PA, Kirkegaard JA and Desmarchelier JM (1994) Biofumigation: isothiocyanates released from Brassica roots inhibit the growth of the take-all fungus. Plant Soil 162: 107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1984) Winter oilseed rape growing systems. Technical Note 66 CH, The North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1985) Winter oilseed rape growing systems 1985/85. Technical Note 86 CH, The North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelqvist LA (1968) Lipids in Cruciferae, II. Fatty acid composition of Brassica napus seed as affected by nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur nutrition of the plants. Physiol Plant 21: 455–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh MS, Pasricha NS and Sahota NS (1980) Yield, nutrient concentration and quality of mustard crops as influenced by nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers. JAgric Sci (Cambridge) 94: 545–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babuchowski K (1971) The processing value of rapeseed, cooking oil and oilcake meal as affected by sulphur nutrition. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyzszej Rolnicej w Olsztynie 5 (supplement): 3–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth E J (1994) The infulence of environment and management on the glucosinolate content of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Aberdeen University, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth EJ and Walker KC (1997) The effectiveness of foliar glucosinolate content raised by sulphur application on disease control in oilseed rape. In: Cram WJ, De Kok LJ, Stulen I, Brunold and C and Rennenberg H (eds) Sulphur Metabolism in Higher Plants: Molecular, Ecophysiological and Nutritional Aspects, pp 327–329. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth EJ, Walker KC and Griffiths DW (1991a) A time course study of the effect of sulphur on glucosinolates in oilseed rape from the vegetative stage to maturity. JSci Food Agric 53: 43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth EJ, Walker KC and Schnug E ( 1991 b) The effect of site, foliar sulphur and nitrogen application on glucosinolate content and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Proceedings of the Eighth International Rapeseed Congress, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth EJ, Coll C, Sutherland KG and Walker KC (2000) Evaluation of physiological activity of bioactives. In: High Quality Oils, Proteins and Bioactive Products for Food and Non-food Purposes Based on Biorefining of Cruciferous Oilseed Crops, Final Report. EU project FAIR CT95–0260

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokenshire T, Channon AG and Wale S (1984) Recognising oilseed rape diseases, Publication 135, The Scottish Agricultural Colleges

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton W and Marcroft S (1999) Oilseed update for the 1999 season - Walpeup. Grains Research and Development Corporation Research Update, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer and Dolf (1999) Influence of rotation and biofumigation on soil-borne diseases. Potato Australia 10: 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton SV (1942) Volatile sulphur content of black mustard plants. Bot Gazette 104: 82–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans EJ, Bilsforrow PE, Zhao FJ and Syers JK (1991) The sulphur nutrition of winter oilseed rape in northern Britain. Proceedings of the Eighth International Rapeseed Congress, Saskatoon, Canada, pp 542–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Fismes J, Vong P C, Guckert A (1998) Effects of nitrogen and sulphur fertiliser on yield and quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Proceedings of the European Society for Agronomy Fifth congress, Nitra, The Slovak Republic, pp 69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman G G Mossadeghi N (1970). Influence of sulphate nutrition on flavour components of three cruciferous plants: radish (Raphanus sativus), cabbage (Brassica oleracea copiata) and white mustard (Sinapis alba). J Sci Food Agric 23: 387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes MRJ and Ainsley AM (1977) Fertilizer requirements of spring oilseed rape. J Sci Food Agric 28: 301–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes MRJ and Ainsley AM (1978) Seedbed fertilizer requirements of winter oilseed rape. J Sci Food Agric 29: 657–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes MRJ (1980) Sulphur. In: Holmes MRJ (ed) Nutrition of the Oilseed Rape Crop, pp 101–121. Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen HH and Bettany JR (1984) Sulfur nutrition of rapeseed. 1. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen and sulfur rates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson E (1970) Glucosinolate content and amino acid composition of rapeseed (Brassica napus) meal as affected by sulphur and nitrogen nutrition. J Sci Food Agric 21: 98–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson E and Appelqvist LA (1968) Glucosinolates in seed of rape and turnip rape as affected by variety and environment. J Sci Food Agric 19: 564–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA (1999) Conservation cropping and disease control. Research in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, CSIRO Plant Industry

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA, Matthiessen JN, Wong PTW, Mead A, Sarwar M and Smith BJ (1999) Exploiting the biofumigation potential of Brassicas in farming systems. Proceeding of the Tenth International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA and Sarwar M (1999) Glucosinolate profiles of Australian canola (Brassica napus annua L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars: implications for biofumigantion. Aust JAgric Res 50: 315–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klessa DA and Sinclair AH (1989) Sulphur in soils, fertilisers and crops. Technical Note T160, Scottish Agricultural Colleges, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Luong H, Booth EJ and Walker KC (1993) Utilisation of sulphur nutrition to induce the natural defence mechanisms of oilseed rape. JSci Food Agric 63: 119–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakkineni KC and Abrol YP (1992) Effect of sulphur fertiliser on rapeseed mustard and groundnut. Phyton Annales rei Botanicae. Prog Sulphur Metabolism Higher Plants 32: 75–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrien A, Ribaillier D, Agbo P and Devineau J (1987) Impact de la fertilisation soufre sur la teneur en glucosinolates des graines chez le colza: consequences agronomiques. Proceedings of the Seventh International Rapeseed Congress, Poznan, Poland, pp 907–916

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath SP and Zhao FJ (1996) Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). JAgric Sci (Cambridge) 126: 53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mithen RF, Lewis BG and Fenwick GR (1986) In vitro activity of glucosinolates and their products against Leptosphaeria maculons. Trans British Mycol Soc 87: 433–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nehl D (2000) Cotton fungal disease on the increase. Media release, New South Wales Agriculture, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall WF, Ukrainetz H, Stewart JWB and Spurr DT (1987) The effect of nitrogen, sulphur and boron on yield and quality of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. and Brassica campestris L.). Can J Soil Sci 67: 545–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall WF, Boswell CC, Sinclair AG, Moulin AP and Townley-Smith LJ (1993) The effect of time of application and placement of sulphur sources on yield of wheat, canola and barley. Commu Soil Sci Plant Anal 24: 2193–2202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasricha NS and Aulakh MS (1991) Twenty years of sulphur research and oilseed production in Punjab, India. Sulphur Agricu 15: 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterka S and Schlosser E (1989) In vitro activity of glucosinolates against Leptosphaeria maculons in comparison to the glucosinolate content and susceptibility of seedlings of different Brassica spp. Mededelingenvan de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 54: 439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor DE (1940) The effect of some mineral nutrients on the development of clubroot of crucifers. J Agric Res 61: 149–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnug E (1989) Double low oilseed rape in West Germany: sulphur nutrition and glucosinolate levels. Aspects App Bio 23: 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh GB and Moolani MK (1970) Influence of sulphur and nitrogen levels on yield and quality of raya (Brassica juncea). Proceedings of Symposium on Fertilizer Use, Bulletin No. 8, Indian Society of Soil Science, pp 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipes BS and DeFrank J (1999) Use of cover crops and biofumigation for plant-parasitic nematode control in pineapple. Final report, Hawaii IPM Program, University of Hawaii, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel C and McLeod R (1998) Control of nematode populations by cover crops. Research projects at the National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, New South Wales, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Studer R (1969) Sulphur fertilizing of winter rape on rendzinas in the Champagne Berrichonne. Comptes Rendus des Seances de 1’Academie d’Agricultre de France 55: 316–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon HLS (1991) Crop responses to sulphur application. In: Tandon HLS (ed) Sulphur Research and Agricultural Production in India, 3rd ed, pp 45–61. The Sulphur Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetter LR, Ukrainetz H and Downey RK (1970) The effect of chemical fertilizers on the content of oil, protein and glucosinolates in Brassica including rapeseed. Proceedings of the Fifth International Rapeseed Congress, St Adele, Canada, pp 92–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers PJA (1989) Effect of applied sulphur on yield and quality of winter oilseed rape. Aspects App Biol 23: 191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers PJA and O’Donnell FM (1994) The response of double low winter oilseed rape to fertiliser sulphur. JSci Food Agric 66: 93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao FJ, Syers JK, Evans EJ and Bilsborrow PE (1991) Sulphur and oilseed rape production in the UK. Sulphur Agric 15: 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao FJ, Evans EJ, Bilsborrow PE and Syers JK (1994) Influence of nitrogen and sulphur on the glucosinolate profile of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). JSci Food Agric 64: 295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao FJ, Withers PTA, Evans EJ, Monaghan J, Salmon SE, Shewry PR and McGrath SP (1997) Sulphur nutrition: an important factor for the quality of wheat and rapeseed. Soil Sci Plant Nut 43: 1137–1142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, K.C., Booth, E.J. (2003). Sulphur Nutrition and Oilseed Quality. In: Abrol, Y.P., Ahmad, A. (eds) Sulphur in Plants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0289-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0289-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6276-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0289-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics