Advertisement

Water Transactions as an Urban Water Supply Strategy

  • Bonnie G. Colby
Chapter
  • 203 Downloads
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 46)

Abstract

In the early years of water market development in the western United States, urban growth was the primary motivation for water transactions. Municipalities have engineered various types of water transfers over the past several decades, as they have sought to supply new residential and commercial customers and to drought-proof their supplies. While water transfers continue to be important for urban growth, they have also become a valuable tool for environmental protection and restoration. Some environmental advocates embrace voluntary transfers as a means to encourage water conservation, stretch scarce regional water resources and to replace the hostility created by litigation and forced administrative reallocations with collaborative interactions. Native American tribal governments also have an interest in water transfers (De Coteau, 2000). In some cases, tribes lease their water to others, while in other instances they seek water for reservation needs. Recreation advocates urge transfers to provide water for Whitewater rafting, sport fisheries and other recreational uses. Large-scale industrial users, such as power plants, mines, breweries and microchip plants buy, sell and lease water as their needs change. The agricultural sector is central to water transactions because crop irrigation is the primary consumptive use of water in most of the west. Therefore, agriculture is the sector which others look to for water.14.

Keywords

Water Transfer Irrigation District Offer Price Water Market Water Acquisition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T.L, and P. Snyder, 1997. Water Markets: Priming the Invisible Pump, Washington D.C.: Cato Institute: 47–66.Google Scholar
  2. Checchio, E. and B.G. Colby, 1992. Indian Water flights, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  3. Colby, B.G., 1998. Negotiated Transactions as a Conflict Resolution Mechanism:72–94 in M. Rosegrant, A. Dinar, and W.K. Easter eds., Markets for WaterPotential and Performance, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Colby, B.G., 1991. “Recent Trends in Southwestern Water Values,” Appraisal Journal, 59:488–500.Google Scholar
  5. Colby, B.G., 1990 “Transaction Costs and Efficiency in Western Water Allocation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 1184–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Congressional Budget Office, Natural Resources and Commerce Division, 1997. Water Use Conflicts in the West: Implications of Reforming the Bureau of Reclamation’s Water Supply Policies, Chapter 4, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Coppock, Ray et al., 1994. “California Water Transfers: The 1991 Drought Water Bank”, in Sharing Scarcity: Gains and Losses in California Water Marketing, H. Carter et al, eds, University of California.Google Scholar
  8. DeCoteau, J., 2000. “The Effects of Development on Indian Rights: Obstacles and Disincentives to Development of Indian Water Rights,” paper presented at Natural Resources Law Center conference, University of Colorado School of Law, June.Google Scholar
  9. D’Estrée, T. and B. Colby, 2000. “Guidebook for Analyzing Success in Environmental Conflict Resolution,” Working Paper, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Fairfax Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Driver, B., 1986. Western Water: Tuning the System, Report to the Western Governor’s Association from the Water Efficiency Task Force 25.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, R., W. Ury and W. Patton, 1991. Getting To Yes, Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Getches, David H., 2000. “The Metamorphosis of Western Water Policy: Have Federal Laws and Local Decisions Eclipsed the States’ Role?” Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 20(1, January): 3–72.Google Scholar
  13. Howe, Charles, et al., 1990. “The Economic Impact of Water Transfers in the Area of Origin: A Case Study of the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado”, Amer. Journ. Agricultural Economics, 72 (5, December): 1200–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howe, Charles W., 2000. “Protecting Public Values in a Water Market Setting: Water Markets to Increase Efficiency and Equity,” U. Denver. Water L Review, 357: 368–72.Google Scholar
  15. Kenney, D. and W. Lord, 1999. Analysis of Institutional Innovation in the Natural Resources and Environmental Realm: The Emergence of Alternative Problem-Solving Strategies in the American West, Natural Resources Law Center Research Report, No. 12, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder: 26–52.Google Scholar
  16. MacDonnell, L., 1990. The Water Transfer Process as a Management Option for Meeting Changing Water Demands, report to the U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado Law School.Google Scholar
  17. MacDonnell, L. et al, 1994. Water Banks in the West, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado Law School.Google Scholar
  18. MacDonnell, L. and T. A. Rice, 1994. “Moving Agricultural Water to Cities: The Search for Smarter Approaches,” N.W. J. Envtl. L & Pol’y, 27.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council, 1992. Water Transfer In the West, National Academy Press: Washington D.C. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Houston, 146F.3d. 1118,9th Cir., 1998.Google Scholar
  20. North, D., 1990. “Institutions and Transaction Cost Theory of Exchange,” in Perspectives on Political Economy. J. Alt and K. Shepsle, eds, Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 182–194.Google Scholar
  21. Nunn, S.C. and E. Checchio, 1988. “Water Transfers in Arizona: Assessing the Impacts on Areas of Origin”, American Water Resoures Assoc. Journal: 547–559.Google Scholar
  22. Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac Desert, Chapter 2, Viking-Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Reisner, M. and S. Bates, 1990. Overtopped Oasis: Reform Or Revolution For Western Water, Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Saliba, B.G. and D.B. Bush, 1987. Water Markets in Theory and Practice, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  25. Susskind, L., Levy, P. and Thomas-Larmer, J., 2000. Negotiating Environmental Agreements,: Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Wahl, R. W., 1989. Markets For Federal Water: Subsidies, Property Rights, And The Bureau Of Reclamation. Google Scholar
  27. Water Education Foundation, Sacramento, 1999. “Rewatering the San Joaquin River,” Western Water September/October: 3.Google Scholar
  28. Water Strategist, 1990–2002. Rodney Smith, editor, published by Strat Econ, Claremont, California.Google Scholar
  29. Weatherford, G., 2000. “Regionalizing Water Management: The Evolving Hydrocommons”, paper presented at the Natural Resources Law Center Conference, University of Colorado School of Law, June.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, P., 2000. “Social Capital, Trust and the Agribusiness of Economics,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25:1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Willey, Z and Tom Graff, 1988. “Federal Water Policy in the United States—An Agenda for Economic and Environmental Reform,” Colum. J. Envtl. L. 13: 325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie G. Colby
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations