Water Supply Economics

  • Benedykt Dziegielewski
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 46)


Urban water supply and sanitation systems play an important role in maintaining public health and safety. Many public water utilities, which build and operate water systems, also provide wastewater collection and treatment service. This chapter is focused primarily on the costs of water supply and, to a lesser extent, on the economics of wastewater treatment and reclamation.


Water Supply Marginal Cost Water Supply System Full Cost Water Reuse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdulrazzak, M.J., M. Jurdi, and S. Basma, 2002. “The Role of Desalination in Meeting Water Supply Demands in Western Asia.” Water International 27(3).Google Scholar
  2. Asano, T., 2001. Water from Wastewater: The Dependable Water Resource. Paper presented at Stockholm Water Symposium, August 12–18,2001, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Boisvert, R.N. and T.M Schmidt, 1996. Economies of Size in Water Treatment vs. Diseconomies of Dispersion for Small Public Water Systems. Working Paper 96–15. Department of Agricultural, Resource and Managerial Economics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  4. Dziegielewski, B. and D.D. Baumann, 1992. “Benefits of Urban Water Conservation.” Environment 34(9): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dziegielewski, B., E.M. Opitz, J.C. Kiefer, and D.D. Bauman, 1993. Evaluating Urban Water Conservation Programs: A Procedures Manual, American Water Works Association. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  6. Dziegielewski B. and W.Y. Davis, 1997. Reassessment of Water Conservation. Consultant report prepared for Eugene Water and Electric Board. Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
  7. Dziegielewski, B., 1999. “The Role of Desalination in Averting a Global Water Crisis.” Conference Report. Water International 24 (4): 395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frederick, K.D., 1995. “America’s Water Supply: Status and Prospects for the Future.” Consequences 1(1).Google Scholar
  9. Herman, S.W., 2000. “Fixed Assets and Consumer Durable Goods: Estimates for 1925–98.” Survey of Current Business. April.Google Scholar
  10. Howe, C. and S. White, 1999. “Integrated Resource Planning for Water and Wastewater: Sydney Case Studies.” Water International 24(4): 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, M., R. Glickstein, and S. Liroff, 1979. “Urban Drought in the San Francisco Bay Area: A Study of Institutional and Social Resiliency.” Journal, American Water Works Association, 71(7): 356–363.Google Scholar
  12. Kiefer, J.C. 1994. City of Phoenix Water Use Monitoring Program: A Multiobjective Study of Single-family Household Water Use. Technical Report, Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd., Carbondale, Illinois, January.Google Scholar
  13. Los Angeles County Sanitary District, 1999. Water Reuse Summary for Fiscal Year 1996–97. Scholar
  14. Lower Colorado Regional Water Planning Group, 2000. Groundwater Supply Alternatives for the Cities of Blanco, Goldthwaite and Llano. Technical Memorandum, Prepared by CH2M Hill. December.Google Scholar
  15. Leitner, G. 1999. Conference Presentation, Reported in Dziegielewski (1999).Google Scholar
  16. Rogers, P., R. Bhatia and A. Huber, 1998. Water as a Social and Economic Good: How to Put the Principle into Practice. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  17. Russell, C.S. and B. Shin, 1993. Marginal Cost Pricing Rules for System Net Benefits, Demand Behavior, and Water Utility Pricing: Conceptual Underpinnings and Case Study of the Phoenix Water and Wastewater Department. USGS Grant Report 14–08-0001-G2086. Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd., Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
  18. Saunders, R.J., J.J. Warford and P.C. Mann, 1997. Alternative Concepts of Marginal Cost for Public Utility Pricing: Problems and Applications in the Water Supply Sector. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 259, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Solley, W.B., R.R. Pierce and H.A. Perlman, 1998. Estimated water Use in the United States in 1995. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1200, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  20. Semiat, R., 2000. “Desalination: Present and Future.” Water International 25(l):54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. US Army Corps of Engineers, 1998. Water Supply Handbook. IWR Report 96-PS-4. Institute for Water Resources, U.S., Alexandria, Virginia.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2000. Fixed Assets and Consumer Durable Goods in the United States, 1925–1997. Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.1996 Clean Water Needs Survey. Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001. Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey: Second Report to Congress, EPA 816-R-01–004, February.Google Scholar
  25. Willett, J.S., 1999. Personal Communication. Phoenix Water Services Department.Google Scholar
  26. Warford, J.J., 1997. Marginal Opportunity Cost Pricing for Municipal Water Supply. Special Paper, International Development Research Center. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedykt Dziegielewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Illinois UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations