Advertisement

Water System Organization and Financial Decision Making

  • R. Bruce Billings
Chapter
  • 202 Downloads
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 46)

Abstract

Water distribution is a natural monopoly, in which a single entity can supply each geographic service area at a much lower cost that any group of two or more competitive water providers. Dual water systems exist but are generally owned by the same utility in order to deliver different qualities of water. A potable water delivery system may be augmented by a reclaimed water delivery system for industrial or commercial customers.

Keywords

Discount Rate Demand Curve Water Utility Safe Yield Water Bill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agthe, D.E., R.B. Billings and J.M. Dworkin, 1988. “Effects of Rate Structure Knowledge on Household Water Use,” Water Resources Bulletin 24(3): 627–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2001. ASCE’s 2001 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Billings, R.B. 1990. “A Demand Based Benefit-Cost Model of Participation in a Water Project,” Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 116(5): 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billings, R.B., and W.M. Day, 1989. “Demand Management Factors in Residential Water Use: The Southern Arizona Experience,” Journal American Water Works Association 81(3): 58–64.Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, N., 1998. Public Finance and the American Economy. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Haarmeyer, D. 1992. Privatizing Infrastructure: Options for Municipal Water-Supply Systems. Policy Study 151, The Reason Foundation, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  7. Israel, D. K., 2001. “The Distributional Impact of Price Ceilings on Water in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Household Water Expenditures in Urban Bolivia,” A paper presented at the Southern Economic Association, Tampa, Florida, November.Google Scholar
  8. Levin, R.B., P.R. Epstein, T.E. Ford, W. Harrington, E. Olson, and E.G. Reichard, 2002. “U.S. Drinking Water Challenges in the Twenty-First Century,” Environmental Health Prospectives, 110 (February, Supplement 1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, W.M., N.H. Laney, and A.W. Griffin, 1985. Saving Water in a Desert City, Resources for the Future, Inc., Baltimore.Google Scholar
  10. Mishan, E.J. 1973. Economics for Social Decisions: Elements of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Prager Publishers, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Neveu, R.P., 1989. Fundamentals of Managerial Finance, Southwestern Publishing, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  12. Timmins, C., 2002. “Does the Median Voter Consume Too Much Water: Analyzing the Redistributive Role of Residential Water Bills” National Tax Journal, forthcoming. Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Congressional Budget Office, 1987. Financing Municipal Water Supply Systems. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. U.S. EPA 2001. Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey, EPA 816-R-01–004 Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. National Research Council, 2000. Watershed Management for Potable Water Supply, Committee to Review the New York City Watershed Management Strategy, Water Science and Technology Board, Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Water Infrastructure Network 2000. Clean and Safe Water for the 21st Century. American Metropolitan Water Agencies.Google Scholar
  17. Whittington, D., D.T. Lauria and M Xinming, 1991. “A Study of Water Vending and Willingness to Pay for Water in Onitsha, Nigeria,” World Development, 19(2/3): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wietzman, M. L. 1988. “Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(3): 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Bruce Billings
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations