Skip to main content

Timber Demand

Aggregation and Substitution

  • Chapter
Forests in a Market Economy

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 72))

Abstract

Forest economics’ existence as a distinct subdiscipline is usually attributed to the unique characteristics of the forest resource (Gregory 1987). The issues of longer production period, opportunity cost of land, and trees as factory and product, along with Faustmann’s subsequent insight, are generally the beginning and end of the forest economics section of broader resource economics courses. Thus, the focus of forest economics has been understandably supply-sided. Once the assessment of forest resources goes beyond stand management to include prices and markets, however, demand analysis plays an equally important role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Abt, R.C. 1984. Regional production structure and factor demand in the U.S. lumber industry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 98 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abt, R.C. 1987. An analysis of regional factor demand in the U.S. lumber industry. For. Sci. 33(1): 164–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abt, R.C., J. Brunet, B.C. Murray, and D.G. Roberts. 1994. Productivity growth and price trends in the North American sawmilling industries: An inter-regional comparison. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D.M., and R.W. Haynes. 1980. The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model: Structure, projections and policy simulations. For. Sci. Mono. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J.M., and S.M. Capalbo. 1988. An introduction to recent developments in production theory and productivity measurement. In Agricultural productivity measurement and explanation, S.M. Capalbo and J.M. Antle (eds). Resources for the Future. Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust, W.M., R.M. Shaffer, and J.A. Burger. 1996 Benefits and cost of forest best management practices in Virginia. So. J. Appl. For. 20(1):23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.G. 1988. Applied production analysis: The dual approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deborger, B., and J. Buongiorno. 1985. Productivity growth in the paper and paperboard industries: A variable cost function approach. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 1013–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. 1993. Aggregation—Aggregate production functions and related topics: collected papers of Franklin M. Fisher, J. Monz (ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 280 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, G.R. 1987. Resource economics for foresters. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailu, A., and T.S. Veeman. 2000. Output scale, technical change, and productivity in the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1041–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R.W. 1977. A derived demand approach to estimating the linkage between stumpage and lumber market. For. Sci. 23: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicxs, J.R. 1963. The theory of wages. St. Martins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1963. The Theory of Wages. St. Martins, New York. 388 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M.T., and C.M. Fulcher. 2001. Hicksian and Marshallian input demand estimation: A differential demands systems approach. Paper presented at Agricultural Economics Workshop. North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H.S. 1955–1956. The Pareto distribution and the Cobb-Douglas production function in activity analysis. Review of Economic Studies 23: 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D.B., and J.R. Moroney. 1975. Substitution among capital, labor, and natural resource products in American manufacturing. J. Polit. Econ. 83: 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, T.B. 1999. The employment impacts of timber harvest constraints: An analysis of the derived demand for labor in the southeastern lumber sector. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 59 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickwar, P. 1992. Costs of protecting water quality during harvesting on private forestlands in the Southeast. So. J. Appl. For. 16(1):13–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinello, F. 1985. Factor substitution, technical change, and returns to scale in Canadian forest industries. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 1116–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinello, F. 1987. Substitution, technical change, and returns to scale in British Columbian wood products industries. Appl. Econ. 19: 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, D.E., and R.W. Haynes. 1983. Production function analysis and market adjustments: An application to the Pacific Northwest forest products industries. For. Sci. 29: 813–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, D.E., and W.R. Singleton. 1986. A dynamic cost and factor analysis of the Pacific Northwest lumber and plywood industries. For. Sci. 32:220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mork, K.A. 1978. Cyclical variation in the productivity of labor. MIT-EL78–002WP. MIT Energy Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, J.C., and B.K. Singh. 1985. Production structure and derived demand for factor inputs in the Canadian lumber industry. Forest Science. 31:871–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R., D. Rothman, P. Faeth, and D. Austin. 1996. Has environmental protection really reduced productivity growth? World Resources Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.K., and J.C. Nautiyal. 1986. A comparison of observed long-run productivity of and demand for inputs in the Canadian lumber industry. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, J.C. 1980. Estimating the production technology in the U.S. forest products industries. For. Sci. 26: 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, J.C., and D.N. Bengston. 1992. Technical change in the North American forestry sector: A review. For. Sci. 38(1): 134–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear, D.N. 1987. The structure of production in the U.S. solid wood products industries and the derived demand for sawtimber. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Montana, Missoula.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abt, R.C., Ahn, S. (2003). Timber Demand. In: Sills, E.O., Abt, K.L. (eds) Forests in a Market Economy. Forestry Sciences, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0219-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0219-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6177-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0219-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics