Skip to main content

Financial Analysis of Timber Investments

  • Chapter
Forests in a Market Economy

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 72))

Abstract

Timber is part of the investment portfolio of a wide range of investors. Traditional forestry investors include farmers who own forest land and the large forest products firms that have purchased forest land to grow timber, usually to supply large pulp and paper mills. Over the last few decades, many new investors have inherited, purchased, or otherwise acquired timberland. These are often passive investors, not actively involved in timber management. However, like all economic actors, they are either directly or indirectly concerned with the returns to timber production. Both passive and active timberland investors have alternative investment vehicles for their scarce capital. Common analytical frameworks can be applied to timber and nontimber assets to help investors assess these alternative asset classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Black, F. and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 81:637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R.A., and S.C. Myers. 1991. Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, J.P. 1998. A fund-based timberland investment performance measure and implications for asset allocation. So. J. of Appl. For. 22:143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, J.P., and W.A. Flick. 1999. Prospects and challenges with securitized timberland. in Proceedings of the 1999 Southern Forest Economics Workshop, I.A. Munn et al., (eds.). Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutter, J.L., J.C. Fortson, L.V. Pienaar, G.H. Brister, and R.L. Bailey. 1983. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, R., and M. Miles. 1989. Commercial forestland in the pension portfolio: The biological beta. Fin. Analysts J. 45:46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T.E., and J.F. Weston. 1988. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. AddisonWesley Publishing Co, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage, F.W., and C.H. Redmond. 1985. Capital budgeting practices in the forest products industry. For. Prod. J. 35:55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.S., and K.N. Johnson. 1987. Forest Management. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deforest, C.E., F.W. Cubbage, C.H. Redmond, and T.G. Harris. 1991. Hedging with trees: Timber assets and portfolio performance. For. Prod. J. 41:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E.J., and M.J. Gruber. 1995. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., and F. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stocks returns. J. Fin. 47:427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortson, J.C. 1986. Factors affecting the discount rate for forestry investment. For. Prod. J. 36:67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, R.A. 1987. Modern Investment Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., and E.R. McGrattan. 1995. The Capm debate. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 19:2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. 1969. Risk, the pricing of capital assets and the evaluation of investment portfolios. J. Bus. 42:167–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Fin. Econ. 3:305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. 1952. Portfolio selection. J. Fin. 7:77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, W.L. 1988. Forestland: Investment attributes and diversification potential. J. For. 86:19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, C.H., and F.W. Cubbage. 1988. Portfolio risk and returns from timber asset investments. Land Econ. 64:325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendleman, R., and B. Bartter. 1979. Two-state option pricing. J. Fin. 34:1093–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, J.A. 1985. Institutional investment in U.S. timberlands. For. Prod. J. 35:13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Fin. 14:425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J.E., F.W. Cubbage, and C.H. Redmond. 1995. Comparing the capital asset pricing model and capital budgeting techniques to analyze timber investments. For. Prod. J. 45:69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J.E. and D.B. Rideout. 1991. Evaluating forest management investments: The capital asset pricing model and the income growth model. For. Sci. 37:1591–1604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, C.L., and C.S. Binkley. 1990. On the use of period-average stumpage prices to estimate forest asset pricing models. Land Econ. 66:379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., J. Caulfield, M.E. Aronow, and T.G. Harris. 1998. Industrial timberland: Current situation, holding rationale, and future development. For. Prod. J. 48:43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C. 1988(a). The stock market’s reaction to timberland ownership restructuring announcements: a note. For. Sci. 34:815–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C. 1988(b). Forestry projects, modern portfolio theory, and discount rate selection. So. J. Appl. For. 12:132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C. 1990. Timberland as an asset for institutional portfolios. Real Est. Rev. 19:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C. 1991. Option pricing and timberland’s land-use conversion option. Land Econ. 67:317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C. 1996. Economic value added and forest management. The Compiler 14:14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C., and H.R. Jenkins. 1998. Much ado about Reits. in Proceedings of the Southern Forest Economics Workshop, K.L Abt and R.C. Abt, (eds.). North Carolina State University, Raleigh,Nc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, F.C., W.R. Sizemore, G.H. Mason, and T.J. Ebner. 1992. Timberland Investments. Timber Press, Portland, Or.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zinkhan, F.C., Cubbage, F.W. (2003). Financial Analysis of Timber Investments. In: Sills, E.O., Abt, K.L. (eds) Forests in a Market Economy. Forestry Sciences, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0219-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0219-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6177-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0219-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics