Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper describes a process improvement study undertaken at three sites of UK electromechanical engineering companies, using a derivation of the Carnegie-Mellon/SEI Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model ®(SE-CMMSM) called the Process Capability Model — Mechanical Design (PCM-MD). The model was applied within a traditional engineering discipline domain, namely mechanical design. The new assessment tool was piloted on a sample of nine mechanical engineers and eight design engineers as well as some ancillary functions, such as stress and thermal analysis. This was expanded to take into account the views of the downstream manufacturing disciplines and was then subsequently rolled-out into the other companies. The results from these studies support the view that the SE-CMM can be adapted and used in CMM-type assessments for mechanical design process benchmarking.

Key words:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. April, A. Abran, E. Merlo, “Process assurance audits: lessons learned” International Conference on Software Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, Apr 19–25 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “BaldridgeQuality Award”, http://www.quality.nist.gov

  3. R. Bate, D Kuhn, C. Wells, “A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model V 1.1” CMU/SEI-95-MM-003, Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, Nov 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bartholomew, “Process is back” Industry Week, Vol 248, Iss 20, pp31–35, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Egan, P.D. Gardiner, I. Black, J.M. Ritchie, “Business Process Measurement — Adapting and Using a Capability Maturity Model in a New Domain,” 15 th World Congress on Project Management, London, UK, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Egan, I. Black, J.M. Ritchie, P.D. Gardiner, “Process improvement in mechanical design using a derivation of the systems engineering capability maturity model.” 33rd International MATADOR Conference, UMIST, Manchester, UK, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “European Foundation Quality Model,” www.efqm.org

  8. J. Herbsleb, “Benefits of CMM-based software process improvement: initial results,” CMU/SEI-94-TR-013, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Ishikawa, “What is Total Quality Control?” pp14–20, Prentice Hall, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. “ISO 9000–9004 Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards, 1987” http://www.iso.ch /

  11. D. A. Kuhn, et al. “A description of the Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model Appraisal Method V 1.1” CMU/SEI-96-HB-004, 3–21 Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh (March 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Neely, M. Gregory, K. Platts, “Performance measurement system design a literature review and research agenda,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol 15, No 4, pp80–116, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, C.V. Weber, “Capability Maturity Model for Software V 1.1” CMU/SEI-93-TR-024, Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, Feb 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Povey, “The development of a best practice business process improvement methodology.” Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, Vol 5, No 1, pp27–44 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Proceedings of Ninth Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, Brighton, UK June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D Sinclair, M. Zairi. “Effective process management through performance measurement,” Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, Vol 1, Nol, pp75–88, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Verma, “Management science theory of constraints/optimized production technology and local optimization,” International Journal of Management Science, Vol 25, No 2, pp 189–200, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.A. Voss, “Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol 15, No 4, pp 5–16, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egan, I., Ritchie, J., Gardiner, P.D. (2003). The Novel Use of a Capability Maturity Model to Evaluate the Mechanical Design Process. In: Gogu, G., Coutellier, D., Chedmail, P., Ray, P. (eds) Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0161-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0161-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0161-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics