Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 42))

  • 1244 Accesses

Abstract

Long-term hydrologic simulation is required for augmentation of hydrologic data. It is useful for water resources planning and watershed management. Long-term hydrologic data are specifically required for analyses of water availability; computation of daily, fortnightly, and monthly flows for reservoir operation; and drought analyses. Since the rainfall data are generally available for a much longer period than are the stream flow data, long-term hydrologic simulation helps extend the gauged data required for the above applications. Since this book deals with the SCS-CN method, the available methods utilizing the SCS-CN method for hydrologic simulation are reviewed and their application is demonstrated using simple examples. Finally, the modified version of the SCS-CN method (Chapter 4) along with its variants is applied to the data set of Hemavati watershed (area = 600 sq. km) in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burton, J. S. Compiler (1993), Proceedings of the Federal Interagency Workshop on Hydrologic Modeling Demands for the 90‘s, U. S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 934018, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haan, C.T. (1975), ‘Evaluation of a model for simulating monthly water yields from small watersheds,’ Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 201, Agricultural Experiment Stations of Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, July.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkins, R.H. (1978), ‘Runoff curve numbers with varying site moisture,’ J. Irrig. and Draing. Div., A.S.C.E., Vol. 104 (IR4), pp. 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HEC (2000), ‘Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS,’ User‘s manual, version 2, Hydrologic Engineering Center, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holtan, H.N. and N.C. Lopez (1971), ‘USDHAL-70 model of watershed hydrology,’ U.S.D.A., Tech. Bull. 1435.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huber, W.C., J.P. Heaney, B.P. Bedient, and J.P. Bender (1976), ‘Environmental resources management studies in the Kissimmee river basin,’ Rep. No. ENV–05–76–3, Dept. of Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Fla, May.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knisel, W.G. (1980), ‘CREAMS, A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems,’ Conservation Rep. No. 26, U.S.D.A. Agriculture Research Service, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra, S.K., N.K. Goel, S.M. Seth, and D.K. Srivastava (1998), ‘An SCS-CN-based long-term daily flow simulation model for a hilly catchment,’ Int. Symp. ‘Hydrology of Ungauged Streams in Hilly Regions for Small Hydro Power Development,’ Mar. 9–10, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nash, J.E. and J.V. Sutcliffe (1970), ‘River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I-A discussion of principles,’ J. Hydrology, Vol. 10, pp. 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandit, A. and G. Gopalakrishnan (1996), ‘Estimation of annual storm runoff coefficients by continuous simulation,’ J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponce, V.M. (1989), ‘Engineering Hydrology: Principles and Practices,’ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ponce, V.M. and R.H. Hawkins (1996); Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?,’ J. Hydrologic Engrg., A.S.C.E., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schaake, J.C., V.I. Koren, Qing-Yun Duan, K.Mitchell, and F. Chen (1996), ‘Simple water balance model for estimating runoff at different spatial and temporal scales,’ J. Geophysical Research, Vol. 101, No. D3, pp. 7461–7475.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, V. P. (editor) (1995), ‘Computer models of watershed hydrology,’ Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, P. and V.P. Singh (2001), ‘Snow and Glacier Hydrology,’ Kluwer Academic Publishers, P.O. Box 322, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, R.D., S.K. Mishra, and H. Chowdhary (2001), ‘Regional flow duration models for 1200 ungauged Himalayan watersheds for planning micro-hydro projects,’ J. Hydrologic Engineering, Technical Note, A.S.C.E., Vol. 6, No. 4, July/August.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, V.P. (1992), ‘Elementary Hydrology,’ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, V.P. and F.X. Yu (1990), ‘Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach,’ J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, A.S.C.E., Vol. 116, No. 6, pp. 837–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soni, B. and G.C. Mishra (1985), ‘Soil water accounting using SCS hydrologic soil classification,’ Case Study, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee (India).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Subcommittee on Hydrology (1998), Proceedings of the first federal interagency hydrologic modeling conference, Interagency Advisory Committee on Water, U. S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams, J.R and V. LaSeur (1976); Water yield model using SCS curve numbers,’ J. Hydraulic Engineering, 102 (HY9), pp. 1241–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Woodward, D.E. and W.J. Gburek (1992), ‘Progress report ARS/SCS curve number work group,’ Proc., A.S.C.E. Water Forum ‘92, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wurbs, R. A. (1998), Dissemination of ‘Generalized water resources models in the United States,’ Water International, 23, pp. 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, B. (1998), ‘Theoretical justification of SCS-CN method for runoff estimation,’ J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mishra, S.K., Singh, V.P. (2003). Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation. In: Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0147-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0147-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6225-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0147-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics