Abstract
A maximum difference conjoint (MDC) model was part of a questionnaire to assess floodplain residents’ preferences for the outcomes of water level management inside an enclosed embankment system on the left bank of the Dhaleswari River, called the Compartmentalization Pilot Project (CPP)-Tangail. The outcomes were described as (a) varied flood depths in the rice field, (b) incidence of flooding on the courtyard and inside homes, (c) changes in floodplain and culture fisheries, and (d) varied conditions of drainage congestion. Following a standard survey, the respondents from inside and outside a completed section of the compartment (Cluster lb) were shown profiles of these flood management outcomes and were asked to indicate for each profile the one most preferred and the one least preferred item. The results of the study indicated that the respondents had a clear preference for preventing flooding of their homes and courtyards and for an ideal water depth of 2 ft in the aman rice fields. At the same time, they also showed a strong concern about malfunctioning of sluices and to a lesser extent about the changes in the fish habitat. The successful application of the MDC as an approach to model tradeoffs among rural residents of Bangladesh shows that a relatively complex quantitative survey method, incorporating choice cards as pictograms, can be applied successfully even in a developing country.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adnan, S.: 1991, Floods, People and the Environment, Research & Advisory Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Adnan, S. and Sufiyan, A. M.: 1993, State of the FAP: Contradictions Between Policy Objectives and Plan Implementation, Research & Advisory Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ahmad, Q. K., Chowdhury, A. K. A., Imam, S. H., and Sarker, M. (eds.): 2000, Perspectives on Flood 1998, The University Press Ltd, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.: 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Blarney, R., Gordon, J., and Chapman, R.: 1999, Choice modeling: Assessing the environmental values of water supply options, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 43, 337–357.
Boyce, J. K.: 1990, Birth of a megaproject: Political economy of flood control in Bangladesh, Environmental Management 14, 419–428.
Brammer, H.: 1990, Flood in Bangladesh. II Flood mitigation and environmental aspects, The Geographical Journal 156 (Part 2), 158–165.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., and White, G. F.: 1993, The Environment as Hazard, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, New York.
Chambers, R.: 1994, The origins and practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal, World Development 22 (7), 953–969.
Chowdhury, J. U.: 1991, Flood Action Plan: One sided approach? Bangladesh Environmental News 2(2), 1–3.
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M.: 1968, Experimental Designs, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York.
Custers, P.: 1992, Banking on a flood-free future? Flood mismanagement in Bangladesh, The Ecologist 22 (5), 241–247.
Dearden, P. and Mitchell, B.: 1998, Environmental Change and Challenge: A Canadian Perspective, Oxford University Press, Toronto.
Dempster, J. I. M. and Brammer, H.: 1992, Flood Action Plan — Bangladesh, Outlook on Agriculture 21, 301–305.
Euroconsult, Lehmeyer International, Bangladesh Engineering & Technological Services, House of Consultants: 1995, Compartmentalization Pilot Project: Water Management Workshop, Experience of the 1995 Monsoon, Technical Note 95/07 (December 1995), Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, Ministry of Water Resources, Bangladesh Water Development Board, Flood Plan Coordination Organization. European Parliament: 1993, Development or disaster?: Taming two of the mightiest rivers of the world; Test case for global disaster management coordinated by the World Bank, Conference on Flood Action Plan in Bangladesh, held at European Parliament, 27–28 May 1993.
Fischoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L., and Keeney, R. L.: 1981, Acceptable Risk, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Haider, W. and Hunt, L.: 1997, Remote tourism in northern Ontario: Patterns of supply and a motivational segmentation of clients, Journal of Applied Recreation Research 22 (1), 49–78.
Haider, W. and Rasid, H.: 1998, Assessing lay preferences for water level management in a regulated river system in northwestern Ontario: Application of a stated preference model, Canadian Water Resources Journal 23 (3), 83–101.
Haque, C. E. and Zaman, M. Q.: 1993, Human response to riverine hazards in Bangladesh: A proposal for sustainable floodplain development, World Development 21 (1), 93–107.
Hughes, R., Adnan, S., and Dala-Clayton, B.: 1994, Floodplains or Floodplans?: A Review of Approaches to Water Management in Bangladesh? Institute of Environment and Development, London and Research and Advisory Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Johnson, B. L. C: 1982, Bangladesh, 2nd edn., Heinmann Educational Books, London.
Kates, R. W. and Burton, I.: 1986, Themes From the Work of Gilbert F. White: Geography, Resources and Environment, Volume 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Kundzewicz, Z. W.: 1997, Water resources for sustainable development, Hydrological Sciences Journal 42 (4), 180–467.
Kundzewicz, Z. W: 1999, Flood protection-sustainability issues, Hydrological Sciences Journal 44 (4), 559–571.
Louviere, J. J. and Woodworm, C. G.: 1983, Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An appraisal based on aggregate data, Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350–367.
Louviere, J. J., Anderson, D. A., and Edwards, D. L.: 1993, Maximum Difference Conjoint Theory, Methods and Comparisons with Choice-and Rating-Based Conjoint, Working Paper, Department of Marketing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
McFadden, D.: 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers of Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–142.
Mirza, M. M. Q.: 2000, The recent floods: What went wrong? The Daily Star (Bangladesh English daily) 3 (409), Thursday, October 19, 2000.
NEDECO: 1993, Flood Action Plan, Bangladesh: Evaluation Report 1993, Netherlands Development Cooperation, The Hague.
Paul, B. K.: 1984, Perception of and agricultural adjustments to floods in Jamuna floodplain, Bangladesh, Human Ecology 12, 3–19.
Paul, B. K.: 1995, Farmers’ response to the flood action plan (FAP) of Bangladesh: An empirical study, World Development 23 (2), 299–309.
Palm, R. L: 1990, Natural Hazards: An Integrated Framework for Research and Planning, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Rasid, H.: 1996, Impact assessments from survey of floodplain residents: The case of the Dhaka-Narayanganj-Demra (DND) Polder, Bangladesh, Impact Assessment 14 (2), 115–132.
Rasid, H.: 2000, Reducing vulnerability to flood disasters in Bangladesh: Compatibility of floodplain residents’ preferences for flood alleviation measures with indigenous adjustments to floods, in D. J. Parker (ed.), Floods: Volume II (Routledge Hazards and Disasters Series), Routledge, London, pp. 46–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rasid, H., Haider, W. (2003). Floodplain Residents’ Preferences for Water Level Management Options in Flood Control Projects in Bangladesh. In: Mirza, M.M.Q., Dixit, A., Nishat, A. (eds) Flood Problem and Management in South Asia. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0137-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0137-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6197-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0137-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive