Skip to main content

Biotechnology and the Commercialisation of Biodiversity in Africa

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 36))

Abstract

Far from being the proverbial basket case, Africa is a continent rich in natural and cultural diversity, and remarkable in the innovations her people have developed to use and conserve biological resources. The region contains a quarter of the world’s biodiversity, encompassing a wide range of habitats from vast savannah plains and tropical forests, through to coral reefs, the world’s largest desert region, and some of the most spectacular freshwater systems in the world.2 These habitats are repositories for an extraordinary range of animal and plant species. Up to 60 000 plant species occur on the continent, including 35 000 endemics that occur nowhere else on Earth.3 The region also contains three of the most biologically diverse countries in the world (South Africa, Madagascar and the Democratic Republic of the Congo),4 three of the world’s biodiversity “hotspots” — or high biodiversity ecosystems under the greatest threat of destruction,5 and one of the world’s eight major centres of crop plant diversity (Ethiopia)6. Many thousands of useful plants and animals are found in the region, with plants such as sorghum, millet, palm oil, cotton and coffee, as well as several timber species, making key contributions to world agriculture. Additionally, many ornamental plants and medicinal products have their origins in Africa.

This paper has formed part of a broader research initiative, led by GRAIN and the Gaia Foundation, to investigate the linkages between trade and biodiversity. These organisations are gratefully acknowledged for allowing these research findings to be used in this publication. Particular thanks are due to the following people for their assistance with providing information, advice and comment: Renee Vellve, Katharine Ainger, Henk Hobbelink, and Anna-Rosa Martinez (GRAIN); Liz Hosken and Tanya Green (GAIA Foundation); Sarah Laird; Robert Lettington (African Centre for Technology Studies, Kenya); Phoebe Barnard (Namibian Directorate of Environmental Affairs); Herta Kolberg (National Plant Genetic Resources Centre of Namibia); Jean Marie Fondoun (Programme Conservation des Ressources Genetiques, Cameroon); Athman Mgumia (Mtandao wa Vikundi wa Wakulima Tanzania); Thomas Kentos Bakyatita (Joint Energy and Environment Projects Uganda); Paul Therence Senghor (Department of Environment, Senegal); Dr JC Autrey (Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute); Doreen Mnyulwa and Julius Mugwagwa (Biotechnology Trust of Zimbabwe); Dr Abebe (Ethiopia Biodiversity Institute); Barbara Dinham (Pesticide Action Network); R. Guyer (Novartis); Robert Maybury and Charles Weiss (International Organisation for Chemical Sciences in Development); Dr Hans Herren and Dr Wilber Lwande (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya); Cyril Lombard (CRIAA SA-DC); Carl van der Lingen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Beentje et al. (1994), ‘Regional Overview: Africa’, in S.D. Davis et al, Centres of Plant Diversity, Volume 1 Europe, Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East, (WWF, IUCN, European Commission, ODA, 1994), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beentjie (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conservation International (1999). http://www.conservation.org/web/fieldact/megadiv/tables/divrank.htm

  4. While unique and threatened ecosystems are found in all African countries, identified ‘global hotspots’ include Madagascar and the Indian Oceans, the Cape Floristic Province and Succulent Karoo of South Africa, and the Guinean Forests of West Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conservation International (1999). http://www.conservation.org/web/fieldact/hotspots/Priority.htm

  6. See for example A.B. Cunningham (1992), ‘Local Initiatives and Institutional Roles’, in L.A. Bennun et al, Proceedings of a Conference held at the National Museum of Kenya, 30 August– 3 September 1992. (National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya);

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.M. Campbell (1986), ‘The importance of wild fruits for peasant households in Zimbabwe’, 12 Food and Nutrition 38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biodiversity Support Programme (1993), African Biodiversity: Foundation for the Future. A Framework for Integrating Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development (Biodiversity Support Programme, Maryland).

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Bank (1992), World Development Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Bank (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Fraser (1991), The World Trade System, (Harlow, Essex, U.K. Longman Group). These figures are however likely to have changed over the last few years, especially given Mauritania’s recent exploitation of oil reserves.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Mugabe (1998), ‘Biodiversity and Sustainable Development in Africa’, in J. Mugabe and N. Clark, Managing Biodiversity. National Systems of Conservation and Innovation in Africa, (ACTS Press, Nairobi) at 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. In Sub-Sarahan Africa, foreign debt approximated to 66% of GNP in 1997. However, for least developed countries, many of which occur in Africa, this figure was as high as 92,3% of GNP in 1997. See UNDP (1999), Human Development Report (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Global statistics for HIV/AIDS indicate an average 39,7 people per 100 000 are afflicted by the disease. In Africa, 111,1 people per 100 000 are affected by HIV/AIDS, nearly three times the world average. See UNDP (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Bank (1999), Global Economic Prospects for Developing Countries 2000. (Washington, D.C.; World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  16. $ refer to US$ throughout the document.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Annual figures based on estimates from P. Heffer, (1999), “Basic Figures on International Seed Trade” (Preparatory Meeting for the Establishment of an African Seed Trade Association, Lilongwe, Malawi, 8–10 April 1999) at 29–32. See also ETC Group (2001). “Globalization, Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda”. Communique July/August 2001, Issue 71. http://www.rafi.org

    Google Scholar 

  18. ETC Group (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. A. Laird and K. ten Kate (1999), “Natural Products and the Pharmaceutical Industry”, in K. ten Kate & S.A. Laird, The Commercial Use of Biodiversity. Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing. (London: Earthscan) at 34–77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Dinham (1999), ‘Pesticide Use in Sub-Saharan Africa’, (Unpublished report, Pesticide Action Network).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dinham (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laird and ten Kate (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Landsberg and C. Kabemba (1998), ‘The US and Africa. A New Beginning?’, 15: 2Indicator South Africa 36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The UNDP Human Development Report (1999) reports that industrial countries hold 97% of all patents worldwide. More than 80% of patents granted in developing countries are held by residents of industrial countries.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reid, W.V. et al, (1993), Biodiversity Prospecting. Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development, (World Resources Institute, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Rainforest Alliance, and African Centre for Technology Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Laird and ten Kate (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S.A. Laird (1999), ‘The botanical medicine industry’, in Laird and ten Kate (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laird (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Juma (1989), The Gene Hunters, (London: Zed Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  30. (1992) 31 ILM 851.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Gollin, ‘An intellectual property rights framework for biodiversity prospecting’, in Reid (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Article 15, CBD.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Art. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. Mundaka, ‘Farmers’ Rights: The Crisis Every Ugandan Farmer Needs to Know About’, 8Rural News. http://www.nic.ug/IRDI/html/rights.html.

  35. F. Dakora (1997), ‘Using indigenous knowledge to increase agricultural productivity in Africa’, in H. Normann et al, Indigenous Knowledge and its Uses in Southern Africa, (HSRC Cooperative Programme and the Institute for Indigenous Theory and Practice).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A.K. Banda (1999), Keynote Address on the Official Opening of Proceedings of the meeting. International Seed Trade Federation, (FIS; See also GRAIN, ‘Plantvariety protection to feed Africa? Rhetoric versus reality’, (GRAIN, 1999),

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Shah (1999), ‘The Seed Industry in Kenya: An Overview’. (Proceedings of the meeting. International Seed Trade Federation).

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Heffer (1999), (Proceedings of the meeting. International Seed Trade Federation); A.J.G. van Gastel et al, ‘Promotion of Seed Marketing in West Africa’, 113, (Proceedings of the meeting of the International Seed Trade Federation)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Banda (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Ndoye (1999), ‘Seed Industry in Senegal’, 68, (Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Seed Trade Federation; van Gastel (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. SSASI Team, World Bank, “Initiatives for Sustainable Seed Systems in Africa”, http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/Abidjan/Paper12.htm

  43. Proceedings of the meeting of the International Seed Trade Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. Mlangeni (1999), ‘US Company Buys Majority Stake of South Africa Seed Producer Sensako’, Business Day 5 March 1999, http://www.bday.co.za/99/0305/company/c3.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  45. L. Cook (1999), “Seed Firm to Lose Staff”. Business Day 25 August 1999, http://www.bday.co.za/99/0825

    Google Scholar 

  46. GRAIN (1999), ‘Beyond UPOV: Examples of developing countries preparing non-UPOV “sui generis” plant variety protection schemes for compliance with TRIPS’, http://www.grain.org/publications/reports/nonupov.htm.

  47. (1991) The Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants an intergovernmental convention managed by the UN World Intellectual Property Organisation. Its original Plant Breeder’s Rights Convention was adopted in Paris in 1961. Since then the Convention has been amended several times and two forms of Plant Breeder Rights are now in common use. Most UPOV members adhere to its 1978 treaty, which is widely interpreted by governments to allow farmers to save and exchange seed. UPOV’s 1991 Convention, however, assumes that farmers cannot save seed unless governments permit specific exemptions.

    Google Scholar 

  48. F. Wambugu (1999), ‘Why Africa Needs Agricultural Biotech’, 400:15–16 Nature (1 July 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibld; See also J.A. Thompson and Zhang-Liang (2000), ‘Biotechnology Fear is a Rich Nation’s Luxury’, No. 3212 Sunday Advocate (16 April 2000). http://www.biotechknowledge.com/showlib us.php3?3212.

  50. USDA (1999), ‘USDA launches biotech research project for Sub-Saharan Africa’, July 27 1999, USDA Press Release. <http://www.gene.ch/>.

  51. (H.R. 434).

    Google Scholar 

  52. J. Dube (1999), ‘African Ministers Prepare for the Millennium Round’, (IPS: 14 July 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Lobe (1999), ‘Trade-US: Political Wrangling Derails Africa, CBI Trade Bills’, (IPS: 29 October 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  54. ‘Africa moves to strengthen biotechnology’, 399:6 Nature (6 May 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  55. ISAAA (1997), ‘ISAAA Launches New Intellectual Property/Technology Transfer Initative’, (12 November 1997), <http://www.isaaa.org/newl.htmo>.

  56. N. Opperman (1999), ‘Plans for biotechnology association for food, feed and fibre sectors’, The Farmer, 25 (October 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  57. For example, in response to a Monsanto advert promoting biotechnology as the solution to the world’s food crisis, 24 African countries and 30 community, environmental and farmer organisations attending a United Nations meeting in August 1998 published a joint statement entitled “Let the Harvest Continue”, objecting strongly that the image of the poor and hungry is being used to push a technology they do not perceive to be safe, environmentally friendly, or economically beneficial.

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. Sharma (1999), ‘USDA Pushing Gene Foods on Third World’, The Pakistan Observer, Islamabad (27 June 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. Otieno (1999), ‘Biotechnology Controversy Rages’, Daily Nation, Nairobi (16 September 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. De Kathen, (1999), ‘Transgenic Crops in Developing Countries. A Report on Field Releases, Biosafety Regulations and Environmental Impact Assessment, UBA-TEXTE 58/99 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See for example, M. Mayet (1999), ‘Critical Review of Existing Legislative Framework for Genetic Engineering in South Africa’, Biowatch South Africa (August 1999). Available from Biowatch South Africa: http://www.nicci@biowatch.org.za.za

    Google Scholar 

  63. F. Huang et al. (1999), ‘ Inheritance of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Dipel ES) in the European Corn Borer’, 284 Science (1999), 965;

    Google Scholar 

  64. E.L. Losey et al. (1999), ‘Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae’, 399 Nature (1999), 214;

    Google Scholar 

  65. T. Spears (2000), ‘Birds Do It Bees Do It. Nature Frustrates Efforts to Confine the Spread of GM Plants’, The Ottawa Citizen (4 January 2000), http://www.ottawacitizen.com/national/000104/3385145.html; “Killer virus”, New Scientist, January 10 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  66. A. Seiler (1996), ‘Impacts of Biotechnology on the Third World’, 17IPR info (Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Novartis Foundation for Sustainable Development, ‘The Socio-Political Impact of Biotechnology in Developing Countries’, (1999), http://www.foundation.novartis.com.

  68. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  69. RAFI (2000), ‘Suicide Seeds on the Fast Track: Terminator 2 Years Later’, (February 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  71. H.R. Herren (1999), ‘Potentials and Threats of the Genetic Engineering Technology: Quest for an African Strategy at the Dawn of a New Millennium’, (Unpublished paper, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cassava provides a good example of this. Despite the fact that cassava serves as a staple food for at least 300 million Africans, the biotechnology industry made no research efforts to improve crop yield and production until the crop was shown to be a feed substitute for pig industry in States. See Sharma (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  73. N. Marshall (1998), Searching for a Cure. Conservation of Medicinal Wildlife Resources in Eastern and Southern Africa, (Cambridge: TRAFFIC International).

    Google Scholar 

  74. L. Ake-Assi (1998), ‘Plantes medicinales: quelques La Gumineuses utilises dans la medecine de tradition Africaine en Côte d’Ivoire’, 25 Monogr. Syst. Bot. Gard; 309;

    Google Scholar 

  75. O. Akerele (1993), ‘Summary of WHO Guidelines for the Assessment of Herbal Medicines’, 28 Herbalgram 13.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Marshall (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  77. M.M. Iwu (1993), Handbook of African Medicinal Plants, (Boca Raton: CRC Press).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Iwu (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  79. F. Grifo et al (1996), ‘The Origins of Prescription Drugs’, in F. Grifo and J. Rosenthal, Biodiversity and Human Health, (Washington D.C.: Island Press).

    Google Scholar 

  80. See R. Wynberg (2000), Privatising the Means for Survival. The Commercialisation of Biodiversity in Africa, (Gaia/GRAIN Briefing).

    Google Scholar 

  81. J. Barton (1999), cited in the International Conference on Biotechnology in the Global Economy, 2–3 September 1999, http://www.iisd.ca/sustainable development/har/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Genomics refers to technology for the automated, high-throughput sequencing of DNA for the study for the 120 000 genes estimated to form the human genome.

    Google Scholar 

  83. L. Glowka (1998), et al, Best Practices for Access to Genetic Resources. Background Paper for the Correspondent Worlshop on “Best Practices for Access to Genetic Resources”‘, (14–17 January 1998, Cordoba, Spain).

    Google Scholar 

  84. ‘Drugs for AIDS in Africa’, (New York Times Editorial, August 23 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  85. O. Ombaka (1999), ‘Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) and Pharmaeuticals’, 15 Echoes 19.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Reponses to a questionnaire administered in January 1999 by GAIA and GRAIN.

    Google Scholar 

  87. M. Mander (1998), Marketing of Indigenous Medicinal Plants in South Africa. A Case Study in KwaZulu-Natal, (Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome).

    Google Scholar 

  88. C. Weiss, and T. Eisner (1998), ‘Partnerships for Value-Added through Bioprospecting’, 20 Technology in Society 481.

    Google Scholar 

  89. R. Cornwell (1998), ‘The African Renaissance, The Art of the State’, 15 IndicatorSA, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  90. The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (2001). http://www.nepad.org

  91. Protocol on Biosafety (Cartagena), (2000) 39 ILM 1027. T.B.G. Egziabher, African spokesperson for negotiations to develop a Biosafety Protocol and to revise the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  92. “Elements for a Positive Agenda in the New Trade Negotiations Under the WTO from an African Perspective”, Council of Ministers, 70th Ordinary Session/5th Ordinary Session of the AEC, 6–10 July, Algiers, Algeria. CM.2110 (LXX) Annex IV.

    Google Scholar 

  93. “SADC Ministers Agreed Negotiating Objectives for the Third WTO Ministerial Conference”, WT/L/317. 1 October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  94. D. Sharma (1999), “The Message from the Seattle Fiasco. Wrong Trade Organisation. Deccan Herald, Bangalore, India Dec 18, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  95. L. Machipisa and R. Oyo (1999), ‘Failure of WTO Talks Applauded, Africa Feels Vindicated’, IPS (Lagos, 10 December 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  96. See http://www.oau-oua.org. Hereinafter referred to as the OA U Model Law. See also J.A. Ekpere (2001), ‘The OAU’s Model Law: The Protection of the Rights of Local Communities, Farmers and Breeders, and for the Regulation of Access to Biological Resources, An Explanatory Booklet’, Organisation of African Unity, Scientific, Technical and Research Commission, Lagos, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  97. E. Masood (1999), ‘Africa seeks laws on GM food exports’, Nature, (5 August 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  98. E. D. Zulu, R. M. Makano and A. Banda (1999),National experiences and plans to implement a sui generis system of protection in Zambia. Paper presented at the UPOV-WIPO-WTO Joint Regional Workshop on “The Protection of Plant Varieties Under Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement”. Nairobi, 6–7 May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Act 15 of 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Law No. 94/01, Articles 11 and 12.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Law No. 96/12, Articles 64 (1 c) and 65 (1) and (2).

    Google Scholar 

  102. R. Bonner (1993), At the Hand of Man. Peril and Hope for Africa’s Wildlife, (Vintage Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Third World Network (1999), ‘Joint NGO statement of support for the African Group Proposals on Reviewing the WTO TRIPs Agreement (Article 27.3b)’, (August 1999), ‘NGOs ask governments to reject new trade round’, 4505 SUNS (7 September 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  105. http://www.safeagemweb.co.za

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wynberg, R. (2003). Biotechnology and the Commercialisation of Biodiversity in Africa. In: International Environmental Law and Policy in Africa. Environment & Policy, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0135-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0135-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6287-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0135-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics