Skip to main content

The Evolution and Structure of Popular Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: The Case of Ghana

  • Chapter
  • 237 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 36))

Abstract

At the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) the significance of citizen participation in environmental decision-making was set out in the Rio Declaration1 and Agenda 212 the two key UNCED instruments. The Rio Declaration recognizes the contribution individuals can make towards tackling environmental issues. It therefore enunciates the right of individual access to environmental information held by public authorities.3 The Rio Declaration also urges States to facilitate public participation by making information on the environment widely available and, by ensuring individual access to judicial and administrative proceedings.4 In addition it underscores the importance of women,5 the youth,6 and indigenous people7 in decision-making on matters relating to the environment.

Research for this chapter has benefited from interviews with staff at the following organizations in Ghana: the Environmental Protection Agency, Friends of the Earth, and Green Earth Organization. A generous grant from the University of East London’s Law School made the trip to Ghana possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Declaration of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, 1992, reprinted in P.W. Birnie and A. Boyle (eds.), Basic Documents on International Law and the Environment, (Clarendon Press, 1995), 9 (text begins at 10).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Programme of Action for Sustainable Development: Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro 3–14 June 1992, United Nations: New York (1993), 9 (hereinafter Agenda 21).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid. Principle 10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid. Principle 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid. Principle 20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid. Principle 21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid. Principle 22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agenda 21, n. 2, above, para. 23.2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. paras. 27.10 and 27.13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. M. Hayward, “The Greening of Participatory Democracy: A Reconsideration of Theory”, 4:4 Environmental Politics, (1995), 215, 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid. 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Webler and O. Renn, “A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Modules for Environmental Discourse, O. Renn, T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (eds.), Kluwer, 1995) 17, 21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. B.M. Hayward, n.10 above, 216.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. G. White, “Including Local Communities in the Negotiation of Mining Agreements: The Ok Tedi Example”, 8:2. The Transnational Lawyer(1995), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Rehbinder, “Ecological Contracts Agreements between Polluters and Local Communities”, in Environmental Law and Ecological Responsibility: The Concept and Practice of Ecological Self Organization, G. Tuebner, L. Farmer and D. Murphy, (eds.) (John Wiley & Sons, 1994), 147, 15354.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost”, 3:1 Journalof Law and Economics, (1960), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.G. White, n.15 above, at 336.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.M. Hayward, n.10 above, at 220.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.221.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Environmental Protection Council Decree, 239 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid. Article 2 (1) (b).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid. 2 (1) (e).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Porter and J.W. Brown, Global Environmental Politics 2nd ed, (Westview Press, 1996), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. For attitudes by national authorities in Ghana towards the protection of the environment see, J.R.A Ayee, “The Formulation and Implementation of Environmental Policy in Ghana”, XXIII: 2 Africa Development (1998), 99, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. Shivji, The Concept of Human Rights in Africa, (CODESRIA, 1989), 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Gouldbourne, “The State, Development and the Need for Participatory Democracy in Africa”, in P. A. Nyong’s, Popular Struggles for Democracy in Africa, (Zed Books, 1987) 26, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Seidman and R. Seidman, State and Law in the Development Process: Problem-Solving and Institutional Change in the Third World, (MacMillan, 1994), 186.

    Google Scholar 

  32. , J. R. Macey, “Promoting Public- Regarding Legislation Through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model”, 86:2 Columbia Law Review, (1986) 223. On Public Choice theory in general see, J. Buchanan & G. Tullock, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, (University of Michigan Press, 1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.R. Macey, n.32 above, 230.

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. A. Dana, “Overcoming the Political Tragedy of the Commons: Iessons Learned from the Reauthorization of the Magnuson Act”, 24: 4 Ecology Law Quarterly, (1997), 823, 834.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See, P. L. Khan, “The Politics of Unregulation: Public Choice and Limits on Government”, 75:2 Cornell Law Review, (1990), 280, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid. 291–292.

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. Porter and J.W. Brown, n.25 above, 28. This attack began in the United States, where it had its most articulate advocates, and then spreading to Europe and other regions. The main forerunners of this paradigm were the Limits to Growth study by the Club of Rome in 1972 and the Global 2000 Report released by the US Council of Environmental Quality and the Department of State in 1980. Both studies predicted that the earth’s natural resources faced depletion and also the degradation of ecosystems. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Reprinted in P.W. Birnie and A. Boyle, n.1 above, 1, (text begins at 2).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid. Proclamation, para. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid. Principle 19.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ghana Industrial Free Zone Authority Decree, 157, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Investment Code, Act 437, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Industrial Free Zone Authority Decree, n.42 above, Article 3 (1) (j).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Investment Code, n.43 above, Article 11 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Forest Protection Decree, 243 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid. Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See, G. Myrdal, “The “Soft State” in Underdeveloped Countries”, 15:4 UCLA Law Review, (1968) 1118, 127. Although Myrdal’s analysis is with respect to the underdeveloped countries of South Asia, he notes that his analysis has validity for other parts of the developing world including Africa. Ibid. 1121. The shortcomings of legislative and policy initiatives in developing countries are highlighted when compared with similar developments in the developed world. Myrdal points out how greater equality of women in civil law matters was gradually attained after a struggle stretching over a long period. These rights-based struggles implied that when rights were finally granted that there were eager and mostly organized groups of citizens prepared to make use of them. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. Porter and J.W. Brown, n.25 above, 24–25, describing how the rise of an alternative social paradigm in environmental thought (sustainable development) did not occur overnight.

    Google Scholar 

  50. These organs of popular participation were to replace the middle class alliances that had consistently dominated Ghanaian politics since independence with a different coalition made up of the radical intelligentsia, the lower ranks of the petty bourgeoisie, the urban workers and the peasants. The revolutionary government claimed that the traditional poltical models had failed the country on 3 counts including reducing Ghanaians to the role of passive spectators while most meaningful decisions were taken in Accra (the capital) by politicians who were beyond public scrutiny once they had secured their election. P. Nugent, Big Men, Small Boys and Politics in Ghana: Power, Ideology and the Burden of History, 1982–1994, (Mansell, 1995), 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  51. G.A. Sarpong, “From Stockholm to Rio: Some Ghanaian Responses to the Problems of the Environment”, XIX University of Ghana Law Journal, (1993–1995), 53, 81–82. The list of laws I cite below are drawn from Sarpong’s observations, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Timber Concessions (Revesting Law), 1982, Law 17.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Timber Concessions (Revesting) Amendments Law, 1982, Law 35.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Road Traffic (Amendment) Law, 1983, Law 43.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gold Mining Products Protection Ordnance (Amendment) Law, 1983, Law 54.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wild Animals Preservation (Amendment) Law 1983, Law 55.

    Google Scholar 

  57. National Energy Board Law, 1983, Law 62.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ghana National Petroleum Corporation Law, 1983, Law 64.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Factories, Offices and Shops Act (Amendment) Law, 1983, Law 66.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mining Rights, Licenses and Certificates (Imposition of Fees) (Consolidated Amendments) Law, 1983, Law 67.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Control of Bush Fires Law, 1983, PNDC Law 46.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid. Article 5 (2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid. Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Haynes, “Power Politics and Environmental Movements in the Third World”, 8:1 Environmental Politics, (1999), 222, 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. “Darkness in Accra & Abidjan”, New African (February 1994), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Friends of the Earth, Plunder in Ghana’s Rainforest for Illegal Profit: An Expose of Corruption, Fraud and Other Malpractices in the Timber Trade, Vol. (Friends of the Earth, 1992), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  67. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Futur (Oxford University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  68. See G. Porter and J.W. Brown, n.25 above, 2425.

    Google Scholar 

  69. The Brundtland Report noted how NGOs and citizen’s groups pioneered in the creation of public awareness and political pressures that stimulated governments to act on enviromental issues. NGOs also identify risks, assess environmental impacts, publish State of the Environment Reports, and provide an efficient and effective alternative to public agencies in the delivery of programmes and projects. See, World Commission on Environment and Development, n.67 above, 326329.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Non-Legally Binding Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of All Types of Forests, 31ILM (1992), 881.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Convention on Biological Diversity, 31ILM, (1992), 822.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ibid. Preamble

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid. Preamble.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ghana Environmental Action Plan (Environmental Protection Council, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Local Government Act, 462 (1993) Article 10 (3) (e).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ibid. Article 5 (1) (b).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ibid. para. (d).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Constitution of the Republic of Ghana, 1992 (Ghana Publishing Corporation, 1992), Article 41 (k).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Report of the Committee of Experts (Constitution), Proposals for a Draft Constitution of Ghana, (Ghana Publishing Corporation, 1991). The Directive Principles of State Policy are for the guidance of Parliament, the President, the Council of Ministers, Political Parties and other bodies and persons in making and applying public policy for the establishment of a just and free society. The Principles should not of and by themselves be legally enforceable by any Court. The Courts should, however, have regard to them in interpreting any laws based on them. Ibid. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  82. See, New Patriotic Party v Attorney General, (1997), The Supreme Court of Ghana Law Reports (hereinafter New Patriotic Party case), 729.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid. 802–803. See also the dicta of Justice Bamford Addo, ibid, 745.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ibid. p.747.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ibid. See, also, S.Y. Bimpong-Buta, The Law of Interpretation in Ghana, (Advanced Legal Publications, 1995), 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  87. See the following: N. A.F. Popovic, “In Pursuit of Environmental Human Rights: Commentary on the Draft Declaration of Principles on Human Rights and the Environment”, 27 Columbia Human Rights Law Review, (1996), 487; C. E. Akello, “The Right to Environment and Generational Equity” 4:2East Africa Journal of Peace and Human Rights, (1998), 125–138; E. Kasimbazi, “The Environment as a Human Right: Lessons from Uganda”, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the African Society of International and Comparative Law (1998), 145; G. Alfredsson and A. Ovsiouk, “Human Rights and the Environment”, 60:1 Nordic Journal of International Law, (1991) 19; D. Shelton, “Human Rights, Environmental Rights and the Right to the Environment”, 28:1 Stanford Journal of International Law (1991), 103.

    Google Scholar 

  88. For instance see, Declaration of The Hague on the Environment, 11 March 1989, 28ILM, (1989), 1308; UN General Assembly Resolution 45/94 (1990). The Rio Declaration also asserts that “human beings are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature”. See Rio Declaration, in P.W. Bimie and A. Boyle, n.1 above, Principle 1. The participants at UNCHE also declared tlat Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations. See Stockholm Declaration, ibid. Principle 1.

    Google Scholar 

  89. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 21:1 ILM, (1982) 59, Article 24.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ibid. Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Ghana’s Mining and Environmental Guidelines(1994), Prepared by the Minerals Commission and the Environmental Protection Council, 21, and 32.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1994, Act 490.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Environmental Assessment Regulations, 1999, Legislative Instrument 1652

    Google Scholar 

  94. Undertakings are defined under the Regulations as “any enterprise, activity, scheme of development, construction, project building, work, investment, plan, programme and any modification, extension, abandonment, demolition, rehabilitation or decommissioning of such undertaking, the implementation of which may have a significant impact”. Ibid. Regulation 30 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ibid. Schedule 2.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ibid. Regulation 17 (1) (a)-(c).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ibid. 17 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ibid. 17 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ibid. 17 (5)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibid. Regulation 5 (1) (c).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ibid. Regulation 16 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ibid. Regulation 27 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ibid. Regulation 27 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  105. This was pointed out to me during interviews with EPA officials.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Interview at EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Interview at EPA

    Google Scholar 

  108. Interview at Green Earth Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Interview at Green Earth Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Interview at Green Earth Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Interview at Friends of the Earth

    Google Scholar 

  112. Proposed O’ Sullivan Housing Estate, Environmental Impact Assessment Report (January 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ibid. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Resolute Amansie Limited, Environmental Impact Assessment: Manso Nkran Air Strip (no date).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ibid. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ibid. Appendix IV.

    Google Scholar 

  117. NTHC Properties Ltd., Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Site —and — Service Scheme at East Legon, Adjirigano, Greater Accra (December 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ibid. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  119. There are measures underway to pass a right to information act in Ghana. See, The Right to Information Bill, 1999 (Draft), reprinted in Justice P.D. Anin, The Right to Information Bill (Draft) (Institute of Economic Affairs, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Rio Declaration, in P.W. Bimie and A. Boyle, n.1, above, Principle 10.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Phillipe Sands, Principles of International Environmental Law, vol. I: Frameworks Standards and Implementation, (Manchester University Press, 1995), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Environmental Protection Agency Act, n.94 above Article 2 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Ibid. Article 2 (f).

    Google Scholar 

  124. The EPA has the power to issue an enforcement notice where it appears to it that the activities of any undertaking threaten the environment or public health. Ibid. Article 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kufuor, K.O. (2003). The Evolution and Structure of Popular Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: The Case of Ghana. In: International Environmental Law and Policy in Africa. Environment & Policy, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0135-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0135-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6287-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0135-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics