Abstract
This paper explores the different social structures coexisting within a biology laboratory. This work draws upon an empirical study and the results are analysed using the social network analysis toolbox. We evidence that actors form links between them in order to carry out cognitive activities. Depending on the content of this activity, resulting networks can take different shapes. When dealing with scientific knowledge, actors tend to form an epistemic community, whereas they form a community of practice when they seek to enhance their skills in setting experiments. Moreover, these two structures are connected by means of boundary objects and boundary spanners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler and Haas [ 1992 ]. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Programme, International Organisation, vol. 46, n° 1.
Alstyne M., E. Brynjolfsson [ 1996 ], Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?, 17 International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH.
Ancona, D.G., and Caldwell, D.F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. Ashby W.R. [1956]. An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London. Baumard P. [1999]. Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Sage, London.
Blackler F., N. Crump, S. McDonald, [ 2000 ]. Organizing Processes in Complex
Activity Networks“. Organization,Vol. 7, n° 2.
Bowles, Gintis [ 2000 ], Social Capital and Community Governance, Working Paper n° 01–01–003, Santa Fe Institute, www. santafe. edu/sfi/publication s/Working–Papersl01–01–003.pdf.
Brown J.S and P. Duguid, [ 1991 ]. Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation, Organization Science, vol. 2, n° 1, pp. 40–57.
Brown J.S. and P. Duguid, [ 1998 ]. Organizing Knowledge, California Management Review, vol. 40, n° 3, pp. 90–111.
Burt R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R.I. Sutton and B.M.
Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich CT: JAI Press. Cowan R., P. David, D. Foray [2000]. The Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change,vol. 6, n° 3.
Dibiaggio L. [ 1998 ]. Information, connaissance et Organisation. Thèse de doctorat de sciences économiques. Université Nice — Sophia Antipolis, Faculté de Droit, de Sciences Economiques et de Gestion.
Girvan M., M.E.J. Newman [ 2001 ]. Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks, Santa Fe Institute working paper.
Haas P. [ 1992 ]. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization. vol. 46, n° 1, pp 1–37.
Ihaka R., R. Gentleman [ 1996 ], R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics,Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5 (3) pp. 299314.
Knorr-Cetina [ 1981 ]. The Manufacture of Knowledge, An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon Press. Knorr-Cetina [1999] Epistemic Cultures. Harvard University Press.
Langlois R., Foss N. [ 1996 ], Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization, Kyklos, 52 (2), p. 201218.
Lave J. and E. Wenger, [ 1991 ]. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press New York, NY.
Leonard-Barton D., [1995].) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA. Lesourne J. [1991]. Economie de l’ordre et du désordre. Economica, Paris. Lundvall B.A. and Johnson [1994], “The Learning Economy”, Journal of Industry Studies,Vol. 1(2).
Nonaka I., H. Takeuchi, [ 1995 ]. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How the Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation, Oxford University Press New York, NY.
Sawney M., E. Prandelli [ 2000 ], Communities of Creation: Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets, California Management Review, n°4, pp.24–54.
Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R. [ 1989 ]. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387–420.
Stork J. [ 2000 ], Knowledge Diffusion Through “Strategic Communities”, Sloan Management Review, Winter.
Wasserman and Faust, [ 1994 ]. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weick, K.E. [ 1969 ]. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Pubslihing company.
Wenger, E. [ 1998 ]. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger E., R. McDermott, W.M. Snyder [ 2002 ]. Cultivating Communities of Practice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Whiteneck, [1996].) The Industrial Revolution and Birth of the Anti-Mercantilist Idea: Epistemic Communities and Global Leadership. In: Journal of World-Systems Research, vol 2, n°1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Créplet, F., Dupouët, O., Vaast, E. (2003). Episteme or practice? Differentiated Communitarian Structures in a Biology Laboratory. In: Huysman, M., Wenger, E., Wulf, V. (eds) Communities and Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6418-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0115-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive