Abstract
The T/P dispute, between transientism and permanentism, concerns the objectivity of the concept of becoming. By detensers I mean those permanentists who try to make their point by semantical analysis of ‘temporal language’. I criticize that type of argumentation as well as some other arguments leveled by either party. If the dispute might be at least hypothetically resolved, that would have to be by means of analyzing the basic theories of contemporary science. It turns out, however, against that background that permanentism is irrefutable even in case it is false. The commitment to transientism is cognitively unwarranted although it is the attitude we tend to assume in practical life.
If there is Becoming, the physicists must know it.
(Hans Reichenbach)
If there is Becoming, but the physicists cannot know it, nobody can.
(Helena Eilstein)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belnap, N. ‘Branching Space-time’, 1992, Synthese, 92.
Broad, C, ‘Ostensible Temporality’, in the collection of R. Gale.
Beauregard de, O., Time, the Physical Magnitude 1987, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing House.
Butterfield, J., ‘Seeing the Present’ in the collection of Le Poidevin.
Čapek, M., Bergson and Modern Physics, 1971, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Čapek, M., ’Two Types of Continuity’, in the collection of R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics, 1974, Reidel.
Čapek, M., ‘The Unreality and Indeterminacy of the Future in the Light of Contemporary Physics’ in the collection of D. Griffin.
Davies, P. (ed.), The New Physics, 1992, Cambridge University Press.
Deutsch, D., The Fabric of Reality, 1997, London: The Penguin Press, Allen Lane.
Earman, J., Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks, 1995, Oxford Univ. Press.
Earman, J., ‘Recent Work on Time Travel’, in the collection of S. Savitt.
Earman, J. and Gale, R., ‘Time’ in: R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 1995, Cambridge University Press.
Eilstein, H., ‘Prof. Shimony and the Transient Now”‘ 1996, Synthese, 107.
Eilstein, H., Life Contemplative, Life Practical, an Essay on Fatalism, in the series Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 1997, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ford, L., Roman, T., ‘Negative Energy, Worm Holes and Warp Drive’, Scientific American, Jan. 2000.
Gale, R.M., The Language of Time, 1968, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gale, R.M., (ed.), The Philosophy of Time, 1978, New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Griffin, D.R. (ed.), Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time, 1986, State University of New York Press.
Goldstein, S., ‘Quantum Theory without Observers’, Physics Today, March and April, 1998.
Gödel, K., ‘Relativity and Idealistic Philosophy’, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed), Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist; The Library of Living Philosophers, 1951, New York: Tudor Publ. Co.
Hawking, S.W., ‘The Edge of Spacetime’, in the collectoin of P. Davies.
Heller, M, ‘Granice przestrzeni i czasu [The Limits of Space and Time]’ in the collection of M. Heller, J. Mączak and J. Urbaniec.
Heller, M., Mączak J., Urbaniec, J.,(eds), Granice nauki [The Limits of Science], 1997, Tarnów: Biblos Publ. House.
Heller, M., Sasin, W., ‘Emergence of Time’,1998, Physics Letters A, 250.
— ‘Time and Physics — a Noncommutative Evolution’, this collection.
— ‘Cosmological Singularity and the Creation of the Universe’, Zygon, September 2000, vol. 35, no. 3
Jones, W.B., ‘Physics and Metaphysics: Henry Stapp on Time’,in the collection of D.R. Griffin.
Le Poidevin, R. ‘The Past, Present and Future of the Debate about Tense’, in his collection.
Le Poidevin, R. (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense, 1998, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lockwood, M., 1997, ‘As Time Goes By’, International Studies in the Philosophy of science, vol. 11.
McCall, S., A Model of the Universe, 1994, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McTaggart, J.M.E., ‘Time’, in he collection of R. Gale.
Mellor, D.H., ‘The Need for Tense’, in the collection of Q. Smith and L.N. Oaklander.
Nerlich,G., ‘Time as Spacetime’, in the collection of R. Le Poidevin.
Oaklander, L.N., ‘A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time’ in the collection of L.N. Oaklander and Q. Smith.
— ‘Freedom and the New Theory of Time’ , in the collection of R. Le Poidevin.
— Temporal Relations and Temporal Becoming, 1984, Lanham: University Press of America.
Oaklander, L.N., Smith, Q. (eds.), The New Theory of Time, 1994, New Haven and London: The University Press.
Placek, T., ‘Branching for a Transient Time’, this collection.
Prior, A., ‘Thank Goodness That’s Over’, 1959, Philosophy 34.
Putnam, H., ‘Time and Physical Geometry’, in his Philosophical Papers, vol.I, 1975, Cambridge University Press.
Rakič, N., ‘Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity’, 1997, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, volume 48. Nr. 2.
Rietdijk, C.W., ‘Special Relativity and Determinism’, 1976, Philosophy of Science, 43.
Rosenthal, S. Time, Continuity and Indeterminacy; A pragmatic Engagement with Contemporary Perspectives, 2000, SUNY.
Rovelli, C, ‘Analysis of the Distinct Meanings of the Notion of Time in Different Physical Theories’, 1995, Il Nuovo Cimento, Vol. 110 B, N. 1, pp. 81 and 86.
Saunders, S., ‘The Quantum Mechanics and Tense’, 1996, Synthese, 107.
Savitt, S.F., (ed.), Time’s Arrows Today, 1995, Cambridge University Press.
Shimony, A., ‘The Transient Now’, in: A. Shimony, Search for the Naturalistic World-View, 1993, Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Q., ‘Absolue Simultaneit and the Infinity of Time’ in the collection of R. Le Poidevin.
— ‘General Introduction’, in the collection of L.N. Oaklander and Q. Smith.
— Language and Time, 1993, Oxford University Press,
— ‘The Phenomenology of A-Time’, in the collection of L.N. Oaklander and Q. Smith.
Stapp, H., ‘Einstein Time and Process Time’ in the collection of D.R. Griffin.
Teichman, R., a review of the collection of Le Poidevin, The Britsh Journal for the Philosophy of Science, December 1999.
Whitrow, G.J., The Natural Philosophy of Time, 1980, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Weyl, H., Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, 1946, Princeton University Press.
Zeh, H.-D., The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, 1986, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Zeilicovici, D. ‘A [Dis]solution of MCTaggart’s Paradox’, 1986, Ratio, 28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eilstein, H. (2002). Against Detensers. In: Eilstein, H. (eds) A Collection of Polish Works on Philosophical Problems of Time and Spacetime. Synthese Library, vol 309. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0097-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0097-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6039-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0097-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive