Advertisement

Branching for a Transient Time

  • Tomasz Placek
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 309)

Abstract

In this paper I analyze this variety of transient time theory that relies on the notion of open future. I present algebraic models of phenomena with transient time, understood as above. The models are then linked to relativistic spacetimes. I finally address some interpretational issues and defend the theory of branching time against David Lewis’ objections.

Keywords

transient time branching spacetime 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap, N. (1992). Branching Space-Time. Synthese 92, 385–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belnap, N. (1995). Various Notes on Outcomes in Branching Histories. ‘Unpublished manuscript’.Google Scholar
  3. Belnap, N. and Szabó, L. (1996). Branching Space-Time Analysis of the GHZ Theorem. Foundations of Physics 26(8), 982–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eilstein, H. (2002). Against Detensers. This volume Google Scholar
  5. Heller, M. (1991). Osobliwy Wszechświat [The Singular Universe]. Warszawa, PWN (in Polish).Google Scholar
  6. Heller, M. (1988). Teoretyczne podstawy kosmologii [Theoretical Foundations of Cosmology]. Warszawa, PWN (in Polish).Google Scholar
  7. Kowalski, T. and Placek, T. (1999). Outcomes in Branching Spacetime. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. McCall, S. (1994). A Model of the Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McCall, S. (1997). Time Flow, Non-Locality and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics. In: S.F. Savitt (ed.) Time’s Arrow Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
  12. McTaggart, J.M.E (1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind 17, 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Müller, Th. and Placek, T. (2001). Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell’s Theorem: Lessons from Fine. Synthese 128, 343–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Penrose, O. and Percival, I.C. (1962). The Direction of Time. Proc. Phys. Soc. 79, 605–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Placek, T. (2000a). Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space-Time: Analysis of Bell’s Theorem. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51 (3), 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Placek, T. (2000b). Is Nature Deterministic? Kraków: Jagiellonian UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Redhead, M. (1987). Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Xu, Ming (1997). Causation in Branching Time: Transitions, Events, and Causes. Synthese 112, 137–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Placek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations