Advertisement

Flow of Time as a Selection Rule in General Relativity

  • Jan Czerniawski
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 309)

Abstract

Lorentz-covariance of special-relativistic formulae expresses a definite spacetime symmetry, which is sometimes claimed to rule out the possibility of time flow. Such an argument from spacetime symmetry is strengthened by the general theory of relativity only if the general covariance of physical formulae yields more spacetime symmetry. It is argued that no general-relativistic spacetime is more symmetric than the special-relativistic one. The opposite opinion results from confusing dynamicity of spacetime metric with its relativity. Moreover, the whole argument from symmetry rests on confusing the physical spacetime with the full spacetime structure of the world. On the other hand, the so-called hole argument indicates some excess of generality in generally-covariant Einstein equations. The possibility of time flow is proposed as a selection rule for eliminating non-physical solutions. It is argued that this excludes no realistic cosmological models.

Keywords

Reference Frame Time Flow Einstein Equation Inertial Frame Cosmic Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.L. (1964). Riemannian Geometry. In: H. Chiu, W.F. Hoffman (eds.), Gravitation and Relativity. New York: Benjamin, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.L. (1967). Principles of Relativity Physics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butterfield, J. (1984). Seeing the Present. Mind 93, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Czerniawski, J. (1998a). On What There Is Not — a Vindication of Reism. In: K. Kijania-Placek, J. Woleński (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Czerniawski, J. (1998b). Über Stäbe, Uhren und Relativität. In: Seilen et al. (1998), pp. 111–159.Google Scholar
  6. Denbigh, K. (1981). Three Concepts of Time. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Earman, J. (1989). World Enough and Spacetime. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Earman, J., J. Norton (1987). What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gödel, K. (1949). An Example of a New Type Solution of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation. Review of Modern Physics 21, 447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kotarbiński, T. (1966). The Development Stages of Concretism. In: Gnosiology. The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 429–437.Google Scholar
  11. Landau, L.D., E.M. Lifshitz (1959). The Classical Theory of Fields. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Maxwell, N. (1985). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 52, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Misner, C.W., K. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  14. Popper, K.R. (1991). A World of Propensities: Two New Views of Causality. In; Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. Raine, DJ. (1981). Mach’s Principle and Spacetime Structure. Reports on Progress in Physics 44, 1151–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reichenbach, H. (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Rietdijk, C.W. (1966). A Rigorous Proof of Determinism Derived from the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 33, 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rindler, W. (1977). Essential Relativity. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Selleri, F. (1996). Noninvariant One-Way Velocity of Light. Foundations of Physics 26, 641–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Selleri, F. (1998). Nichtinvarianz der Ein-Weg-Lichtgeschwindigkeit. In: Selleri et al. (1998), pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
  21. Selleri, F., J. Brandes, J. Czerniawski, U. Hoyer and K. Wohlrabe (1998). Die Einstein’sche und Lorentzianische Interpretation der speziellen und allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Karlsbad: VRI.Google Scholar
  22. St. Augustine (1961). Confessions. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  23. Tangherlini, F.R. (1961). An Introduction to the General Theory of Relativity. Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 20, 1–86.Google Scholar
  24. Wald, R.M. (1984). General Relativity. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wójcicki, R. (1979). Topics in Formal Methodology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Czerniawski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations