Advertisement

Welfare to Well-Being Transition

  • Bonnie Braun
  • Patricia D. Olson
  • Jean W. Bauer
Chapter
  • 123 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 17)

Abstract

Welfare to well-being leads to better quality of life for families and communities. Around the world, societies are experimenting and shifting policies that address welfare to well-being for families and communities. In the U.S., the greatest shift in several decades has occurred with the welfare reform policies. These shifts have placed at issue the extent to which individuals and families and governments contribute to self-sufficiency and sustainability of their members and the collective whole in society. The paper addresses: a framework for thinking about sustaining well-being in the context of making transitions from welfare for the few to well-being for the many; a research illustration of focus group findings on the meaning of self-sufficiency for families who are currently receiving one type of welfare (food stamps); and the opportunities emerging in the context of the interaction of the family and society at the community, state, national and global level that allows for a wholistic response to issues around well-being and quality of life studies.

Keywords

Public Assistance Welfare Reform Food Stamp Food Stamp Program Welfare Dependence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun B. and J. Bauer: 1998a, ‘Welfare reform: an opportunity to engage universities in community and economic development’, Journal of Public Service and Outreach 3 (1), pp. 33–37.Google Scholar
  2. Braun, B. and J. Bauer: 1998b, ‘From welfare to well-being: a framework for dialogue and action’, in M. I. Henry, D. I. Mitstifer and F. M. Smith (eds.), Toward a Theory of Family Well-being II, pp. 71–76.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, B., K. Craig, J. Bauer and C. J. Peck: 1996, ‘Welfare reform issues, implications and public policy’, in I. Leech (ed.), Consumer Interests Annual 42 ( American Council on Consumer Interests, Columbia MO ), pp. 365–371.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, B., K. Craig, J. Henton, T. Knipp and M. Naddaff: 1995, Welfare Reform: Justice for Children and Families (National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, Special Task Force on Welfare Reform, Board on Human Sciences, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U.: 1979, The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  6. Bubolz, M. M. and M. S. Sontag: 1993, ‘Human ecology theory’, in P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm and S. Steinmetz (eds.), Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods ( Plenum Press, New York ), pp. 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, A.: 1994, ‘The illusion of local sustainability and self-sufficiency: famine in a border area of Northwestern Zambia’, Society of Applied Anthropology 53, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  8. Henry, M. I., D. I. Mitstifer and F. M. Smith: 1998, Toward a Theory of Family Well-being I I ( Kappa Omicron Nu Honor Society, East Lansing, MI ).Google Scholar
  9. Lie, G. and R. M. Morney: 1992, ‘A controlled evaluation of comprehensive social services provided to teenage mothers receiving AFDC’, Research on Social Work Practice 2, pp. 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Magistad, B. M., J. W. Bauer, M. S. Frazer and M. S. Stum: 1998, Families on Food Stamps: Perspectives about Making Ends Meet. Final report MIN 52–055. Working paper, Family Social Science Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul MN.Google Scholar
  11. Pickett J. P. et al.: 1998, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (The Learning Company, electronic division 1998 Learning Company Properties, Inc., San Jose, CA ).Google Scholar
  12. Sandfort, J. R. and M. S. Hill: 1996, ‘Assisting young, unmarried mothers to become self-sufficient: the effect of different types of early economic support’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 58, pp. 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. United States Department of Health and Human Services: 1997, Indicators of Welfare Dependence. Annual Report to Congress ( USDHHS, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  14. Zimmerman, S.: 1992, Family Policies and Family Well-being (Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie Braun
    • 1
  • Patricia D. Olson
    • 2
  • Jean W. Bauer
    • 3
  1. 1.Family Studies DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.College of Human EcologyUniversity of Minnesota — Twin CitiesSt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.Family Social Science DepartmentUniversity of Minnesota — Twin CitiesSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations