Social Indicators and Living Conditions in the Netherlands

  • Jeroen Boelhouwer
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 17)


The Dutch Social en Cultural Planning Office (SCP) monitors social changes and social services, evaluates social policies, gives information about expected developments in the future and gives recommendations for further policy. Key issues are the assessment of economic, demographic and social changes and the influence of these factors on the social and living conditions of the population. The SCP uses social and economic indicators to examine these developments. Besides researching specific themes (such as social exclusion, the consequences of long-term unemployment, the social position of the elderly and use, costs and productivity of social services) the SCP has developed an overall monitoring tool for the living conditions: the living conditions index (LCI). Nowadays the index is composed of indicators which reflect conditions in eight areas: housing, health, consumer durables, leisure activity, sport activity, social participation, mobility and holiday. In the future, the SCP will attempt to develop a conceptual model that will link the living conditions index to other social indices like livability (housing and level of services), poverty and socioeconomic deprivation.


Living Condition Social Participation Social Indicator United Nations Development Programme Cultural Outlook 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews, F. M. (ed.): 1986, Research on Quality of Life ( Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI ).Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, R. A. (ed.): 1966, Social Indicators ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA ).Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A.: 1981, The Sense of Well-Being in America ( McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E. and E. Suh: 1997, ‘Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators’, Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horn, R. V.: 1993, Statistical Indicators for the Economic Sciences ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mootz, M. and M. Konings-van der Snoek: 1997, De mate van welzijn: verdeling en concentraties van welzijnsaspecten 1974–1989 ( Social and Cultural Planning Office/VUGA, Rijswijk/The Hague ).Google Scholar
  7. Noll, H.: 1998, Social Indicators and Social Reporting: the International Experience ( and
  8. Nussbaum, M. C. and A. Sen (eds.): 1993, The Quality of Life ( Oxford University Press, New York ).Google Scholar
  9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: 1973, List of Social Concerns. Common to Nost OECD Countries ( OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
  10. Roes, Th.: 1998, ‘Linking social monitoring and policy-making. Experiences of the Dutch Social and Cultural Planning Office’, in W. Hang et al. (eds.), Statistics as a Public Service ( Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Bern ).Google Scholar
  11. Social and Cultural Planning Office: 1996, various editions, Sociale en culturele verkenningen ( Social and Cultural Planning Office/VUGA, Rijswijk/The Hague).Google Scholar
  12. Social and Cultural Planning Office: 1996, Social and Cultural Report 1996 ( Social and Cultural Planning Office/VUGA, Rijswijk/The Hague ).Google Scholar
  13. SPSS: 1990, SPSS Categories (SPSS, USA).Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Development Programme: 1998, Human Development 1998 ( Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford ).Google Scholar
  15. Veenhoven, R.: 1996, ‘Developments in satisfaction-research’, Social Indicators Research 37, pp. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vogel, J.: 1995, The Social Indicator Tradition. Paper presented at Eurostat meeting 20, 21 February 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeroen Boelhouwer
    • 1
  1. 1.Social and Cultural Planning OfficeThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations