Access to Health Care: Social Determinants of Preventive Cancer Screening Use in Northern British Columbia

  • Joanne Bryant
  • Annette J. Browne
  • Sylvia Barton
  • Bruno D. Zumbo
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 17)


The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which social factors are influential in determining women’s access to cancer screening services in Prince George, British Columbia. Specifically, this study evaluated the association of age, income, education, work status, disability, marital status, and immigrant status with previous use of screening mammography and Pap tests. Data was obtained from the 1994 National Population Health Survey, which contains a sample of 416 women from the Prince George area. A series of logistic regression analyses were used to distinguish ever versus never been screened as well as recency of previous screening. Participation rates in screening mammography in Prince George are comparatively high; however, no association was found between social factors and previous mammography use. This suggests women in Prince George are participating in mammography services regardless of social background. Participation rates in Pap test screening in Prince George are high and are similar to provincial averages; however, while a large percentage of women have been screened, this percentage varies across social groups. Immigrant women, single women, and women with less education are over represented among women who have never had a Pap test. In addition, older women are less likely to obtain a recent Pap test when compared to younger women. This study suggests that certain groups of women in northern British Columbia experience low participation in health services, resulting in a higher risk for poor health and a poor quality of life.


Immigrant Woman British Columbia Cancer Screening Program National Population Health Survey Screening Mammography Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beaulieu, M. D., F. Beland, D. Roy, M. Falardeau and G. Hebert: 1996, `Factors determining compliance with screening mammography’, Canadian Medical Association Journal 154 (9), pp. 1335–1343.Google Scholar
  2. British Columbia Provincial Health Officer: 1995, Women’s health feature report’, in A Report on the health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officers Annual Report 1995 ( Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, Victoria, BC ).Google Scholar
  3. British Columbia Provincial Health Officer: 1996, A Report on the Health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officers Annual Report 1996 ( Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, Victoria, BC ).Google Scholar
  4. British Columbia Statistics: 1996, Special Feature: BC Immigrant Population, Ethnicity and Language [On-Line]. Available:
  5. Calle, E. E., W. D. Flanders, M. J. Thun and L. M. Martin: 1993, ‘Demographic predictors of mammography and pap smear screening in U.S. women’, American Journal of Public Health 83, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, Health Canada: 1994, The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care ( Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  7. Center for Disease Control and Prevention: 1996, CDC Prevention Guidelines: Effectiveness [On-Line]. Available:
  8. Clay, M. G., T. G. Hislop, L. Kan, I. A. Olivotto and L. J. Warren-Burhenne: 1994, `Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988–1993’, The American Journal of Surgery 167, pp. 490–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J.: 1992, A power primer’, Psychological Bulletin 112 (1), pp. 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deschamps, M., P. R. Band, T. G. Hislop, H. F. Clarke, J. M. Smith, V. Ng and M. Math: 1992, `Barriers to cervical cytology screening in native women in British Columbia’, Cancer Detection and Prevention 16 (5/6), pp. 337–339.Google Scholar
  11. Goel, V.: 1994, Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the Ontario Health Survey’, Canadian Journal of Public Health 85, pp. 125–127.Google Scholar
  12. Harper, P.: 1993, Mammography utilization in the poor and medically under-served’, Cancer 72 (4), pp. 1478–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Health Canada: 1998, Cervical Cancer in Canada [On-Line]. Available:
  14. Ives, D. G., J. R. Lave, N. D. Traven, R. Schulz and L. H. Kuller: 1996, ‘Mammography and pap smear use by older rural women’, Public Health Reports 111, pp. 244–250.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. M., T. G. Hislop, L. Kan, A. J. Coldman and A. Lai: 1996, ‘Compliance with the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: will she return?’ Canadian Journal of Public Health 87 (3), pp. 176–179.Google Scholar
  16. Katz, S. J. and T. P. Hofer: 1994, Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage’, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 272, pp. 530–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKeever, L. and I. M. Martinson: 1986, Older women’s health care’, in D. K. Kjervik and I. M. Martinson (eds.), Women in Health and Illness ( WB Sanders, New York ).Google Scholar
  18. Pender, N. J.: 1987. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice ( Appleton and Lange, Stanford).Google Scholar
  19. Potvin, L., J. Camirand and F. Beland: 1995, `Patterns of health services utilization and mammography use among women aged 50 to 59 years in the Quebec Medicare System’, Medical Care 33 (5), pp. 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rimer, B. K., B. Trock, P. F. Engstrom, C. Lerman and E. King: 1991, Why do some women get regular mammograms?’ American Journal of Preventive Medicine 7 (2), pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
  21. Snider, J., J. Beauvais, I. Levy, P. Villenueve and J. Pennock: 1996, Trends in mammography and pap smear utilization in Canada Chronic Diseases in Canada 17(3–4), pp. 108–117.Google Scholar
  22. Statistics Canada: 1995, National Population Health Survey (NPHS): Public Use Microdata File Ddocumentation, 1994–1995 ( Health Statistics Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Bryant
    • 2
  • Annette J. Browne
    • 2
  • Sylvia Barton
    • 2
  • Bruno D. Zumbo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaCanada
  2. 2.University of Northern British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations