Advertisement

Personal and Moral Selfhood

  • David Carr
Chapter
  • 181 Downloads
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 11)

Abstract

Moral conceptions of personhood seem liable to different, more or less interesting, interpretations. This paper argues that on more interesting interpretations, the moral self is not so much identical with personhood, but more a significant feature or dimension of it. In general, the paper sets out to identify and evaluate the relative merits of very diverse conceptions of the relationship of person to moral agency in the major traditions of moral theory. In particular, however, the paper argues that a broadly naturalistic virtue ethics promises to give a better account of the relationship of personhood to morality than its deontological, utilitarian and communitarian rivals.

Keywords

communitarianism Kantian (ethics) moral agency person self utilitarianism virtue (ethics) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anscombe, G.E.M., Modern Moral Philosophy, Philosophy 33 (1958), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle, The Nichomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1925.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, D., Educating the Virtues. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, D., After Kohlberg: Some Implications of an Ethics of Virtue for the Theory of Moral Education and Development, Studies in Philosophy and Education 15 (1996), pp. 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Descartes, R., Meditations and Discourses, in G.E.M. Anscombe and P.T. Geach (eds.) Descartes: Philosophical Writings. London: Nelson, 1954, pp. 5–109.Google Scholar
  6. Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Hursthouse, R., On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Translated by H.J. Paton as The Moral Law. London: Hutchinson, 1948.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I., The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N. Kemp-Smith, London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Maclntyre, A.C., After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Maclntyre, A.C., Whose Justice, Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. MacIntyre, A.C., Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. Maclntyre, A.C., Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London, Duckworth, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Mill, J.S., Utilitarianism, in M. Warnock, M. (ed.), Utilitarianism. Collins: The Fontana Library, 1970, pp. 251–321.Google Scholar
  15. Nagel, T., The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Nussbaum, M., Aristotelian Social Democracy, in R. Douglass, G. Mara, and H. Richardson (eds.) Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge, 1990, pp. 203–252.Google Scholar
  17. Nussbaum, M., Non-relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach, in M.C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 242–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. Rousseau, J-J., The Social Contract and Other Discourses. London: Dent, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Slote, M., Goods and Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  21. Slote, M., Some Advantages of Virtue Ethics, in O. Flanagan and A.O. Rorty, Identity, Character and Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 429–428.Google Scholar
  22. Slote, M., From Morality to Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Slote, M., Virtue Ethics and Democratic Values, Journal of Social Philosophy 24 (1993), pp. 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, C., Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Carr

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations