Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Discovery of Nuclear Waste

  • Chapter
The Bedrock of Opinion

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 32))

  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

When did man discover nuclear waste? To answer this question, we first have to ask if nuclear waste really is something that could be called a scientific discovery, such as might deserve a Nobel Prize in physics. In early writings within nuclear energy research radioactive waste appears to be a neglected issue, a story never told. Nuclear waste first seems to appear when a public debate arose about public health risks of nuclear power in the late 1960s and early 70s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Weart 1979, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weart 1988: 296.

    Google Scholar 

  3. It is of course possible for an historian to notice and try to explain the lack of different voices in history. The best example from SandTS is perhaps the studies trying to explain the lack of women in science and technology. This topic has also been discussed explicitly by Pinch and Bijker (1984) when developing the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) approach, see Bijker 1995: 48f and Pinch 1996: 31f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The interpretative flexibility of the fission by-products has never diminished. Waste vs. resource is still a contested part of the future of nuclear power. This discussion is about reprocessing, breeder reactors and transmutation. In Sweden, however, since the beginning of the 1980s the interpretation, and therefore nuclear waste management, is based on the definition that all spent fuel is nuclear waste. See later sections of this chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anshelm 2000: 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Swedish laymen, on the contrary, consider risks associated with nuclear waste to be greater than risks connected with nuclear power. See Hedberg 2000: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Carlson 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lundgren 1998: ch. 16, 35, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Valduell Palme–Fälldin, 1976–09–01.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Val 76: Socialdemokratema, 1976–09–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rhodes 1988: ch. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Proctor 1995: 181.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weart 1988: 88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a detailed history of radiation safety work in the Manhattan project see Hacker 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weart 1988: 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The dual role, of both promoting and supervising nuclear energy, the AEC carried out until 1974. At this time the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) became the federal agency for licensing and supervising, while from 1977 the new Department of Energy (DOE) was given the responsibility for the development of nuclear energy issues (Weart 1988: 346).

    Google Scholar 

  17. de la Bruhèze 1992: 143.

    Google Scholar 

  18. de la Bruhèze 1992: 142.

    Google Scholar 

  19. de la Bruhèze 1992: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Weart 1988: 343.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weart 1988: 184–185.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weart 1988: 185.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weart 1988: 199.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goertzel and Goertzel 1995: 144; cf. Weart 1988: 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weart 1988: 203.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goertzel and Goertzel 1995: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weart 1988: 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goertzel and Goertzel 1995: xiv, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goertzel and Goertzel 1995: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weart 1988: 204.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Mazur 1981: ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. Proctor 1995: 162.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weart 1988: 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weinberg 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weart 1988: 313–314; Lindell and Löfveberg 1972: 254f.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weart 1988: 316.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weinberger 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lindström 1991: 152ff.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lindqvist 1997: 97.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Larsson 1987: 134.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Land 1976–12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Land 1976–12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Government Committee Investigations (SOU) are, in Sweden, an important tool for politicians to commission urgent knowledge before important decisions are taken.

    Google Scholar 

  44. SOU 1970:13, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  45. SOU 1956:46.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cited from Kägeson and Kjellström 1984: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kageson and Kjellström 1984:21.

    Google Scholar 

  48. DsI 1971:1, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ds1 1971:1, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dsl 1971:1, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kageson and Kjellström 1984: 25.

    Google Scholar 

  52. DsI 1971:1, pp. 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  53. DsI 1971:1, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  54. DsI 1971:1, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  55. DsI 1971:1, pp. 2, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Persson 1992: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dsl 1971:1, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lewin 1992; Rothstein 1992. See also Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sundqvist 1991: ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jasanoff 1990; see also Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Larsson 1987: 126.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lindström 1991: 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lindström 1991:53.

    Google Scholar 

  64. ASEA was to deliver nine of the twelve Swedish reactors in the 70s and 80s.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schagerholm 1993: 17.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lindström 1991: 60.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Larsson 1987: 127; for big science see Price 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Larsson 1987: 126–127; Lindström 1991: 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Larsson 1987: 127.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lindström 1991: 92; Schagerholm 1993: 17.

    Google Scholar 

  71. See Lindström 1991:58.

    Google Scholar 

  72. See Lindström 1991: 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lindström 1991:56.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Schagerholm 1993: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lindström 1991: 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Larsson 1987: 122.

    Google Scholar 

  77. For further reading see Lindström 1991 and Schagerholm 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Larsson 1987: 150–151; Schagerholm 1993: 60.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Larsson 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Larsson 1987: 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schagerholm 1993:60.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Weart 1988: 303; cf. Anshelm 2000: 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Larsson 1987: 127.

    Google Scholar 

  84. de la Bruhèze 1992: 151.

    Google Scholar 

  85. de la Bruhèze 1992: 151.

    Google Scholar 

  86. de la Bruhéze 1992: 152, 169 n. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Parker et al. 1984: 18; Tierney 1984: 94.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Tierney 1984: 95.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cited from de la Bruhéze 1992: 163.

    Google Scholar 

  90. de la Bruhéze 1992: 155.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Tierney 1984: 97, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Tierney 1984: 106; Weart 1988: 317.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tierney 1984: 106.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Weart 1988: 317.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Tierney 1984: 106.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Weart 1988: 317.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Weart 1988: 317–318. The first results from surveys in Sweden, in 1980, showed that people were more concerned about nuclear waste than about nuclear reactors. This ranking has been confirmed every year since then. See Hedberg 2000: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  98. DsI 1971:1, pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  99. DsI 1971:1, pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  100. DsI 1971:1, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  101. SOU 1976:31, pp. 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  102. SOU 1976:30, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  103. SOU 1976:30, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  104. SOU 1976:30, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  105. SOU 1976:30, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  106. SOU 1976:31, ch. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Jamison, Eyerman and Cramer 1990; Schagerholm 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lindqvist 1997: ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Cited from Kägeson and Kjellström 1984: 26; cf. Leijonhufvud 1979: 30 and Schagerholm 1993: 74.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Cited from Kageson and Kjellström 1984: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Schagerholm 1993: 76.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Larsson 1987: 156.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Alfvén 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schagerholm 1993: 76f; see Weart 1988: 343f about the Swedish import of arguments from United States.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Larsson 1987: 156.

    Google Scholar 

  116. In some Swedish political parties the national congress is the highest decision-making body, where all members are invited to participate.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Schagerholm 1993:77.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Schagerholm 1993:77.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Jamison 1987: 38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Science and Technology Studies, Göteborg University, Sweden

    Göran Sundqvist

Authors
  1. Göran Sundqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sundqvist, G. (2002). The Discovery of Nuclear Waste. In: The Bedrock of Opinion. Environment & Policy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9950-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9950-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5958-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9950-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation