Abstract
Research on higher education governance in the United States and Canada has tended to emphasize the importance of a number of analytical approaches (Birnbaum 1988; Hardy 1990; Pusser and Ordorika 2001). While these approaches are frequently discussed as ‘models’ of higher education governance, they are perhaps best understood as different organisational frames or analytical lenses. The bureaucratic frame, for example, applies Weber’s characteristics of bureaucracy to the university setting in order to illustrate a rational arrangement of hierarchical authority relationships (Stroup 1966). The collegial frame begins with the assumption that the university can be understood as a community of scholars where decisions are made by consensus (Goodman 1962; Millet 1962), while the political frame described by Baldridge (1971) assumes that the university is a pluralistic entity where the decision making process involves a competition between competing individual and group interests. Other analytical frames have included organised anarchy (Cohen and March 1974), professional bureaucracy (Mintzberg 1991), and ‘mixed models’ that attempt to combine different frames and/or relate these frames to theories of organisational culture (Hardy 1990; Pusser and Ordorika 2001). While each of these frames contributes to our understanding of different ways of understanding university governance and decision making, the utility of each approach in the empirical analysis of university governance is limited since each begins with a template of normative characteristics. What one sees depends on the lens that one has chosen to look through, and yet many observers have noted that elements of each frame can be found in the same institution.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, B. and G.A. Jones. “Organizational Capacity and Political Activities of Canadian University Faculty Associations.” Interchange 29. 4 (1998): 439–361.
Baldridge, J.V. Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations. New York: J. Wiley, 1971.
Berdahl, R.O. Statewide Coordination of Higher Education. Washington: American Council on Education, 1971.
Birnbaum, R. How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1988.
Cameron, D. More Than an Academic Question: Universities, Government, and Public Policy in Canada. Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1991.
Clark, B. R. The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Cohen, M. D., and J.G. March. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1974.
Coleman, W. D. and G. Skogstad. “Policy Communities and Policy Networks: A Structural Approach.” In Coleman, W.D. and G. Skogstad (eds). Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman, 1990, 14–33.
Duff, J. and R.O. Berdahl. University Government in Canada. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada and the Canadian Association of University Teachers, 1966.
Goodman, P. The Community of Scholars. New York: Random House, 1962.
Hardy, C. “Putting Power into University Governance.” In J.C. Smart (ed). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Volume V I. New York: Agathon Press, 1990.
Hardy, C. The Politics of Collegiality: Retrenchment Strategies in Canadian Universities. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press, 1996.
Horn, M. Academic Freedom in Canada: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
Jones, G. A. “Student Pressure: A National Survey of Canadian Student Organization.” Ontario Journal of Higher Education (1995): 93–106.
Jones, G. A. “Governments, Governance, and Canadian Universities.” In J.C. Smart (ed). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume XI, New York: Agathon Press, 1996, 337–371.
Jones, G.A., T. Shanahan and P. Goyan. “University Governance in Canadian Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management 7 (2001): 135–148.
Jones, G. A., T. Shanahan and P. Goyan. “Traditional Governance Structures — Current Policy Pressures: The Academic Senate and Canadian Universities.” Tertiary Education and Management 8 (2002): 29–45.
Jones, G. A. and M.L. Skolnik. “Governing Boards in Canadian Universities.” Review of Higher Education 203 (1997): 277–295.
McDaniel, O.C. “The Paradigms of Governance in Higher Education Systems.” Higher Education Policy 92 (1996): 137–158.
Millet, J.D. The Academic Community: An Essay on Organization. New York: McGraw Hill, 1962.
Mintzberg, H. “The Professional Bureaucracy.” In M.W. Peterson (ed). Organization and Governance of Higher Education. Lexington, GA: Ginn Press, 1991, 53–75.
Nelson, W. T. The Search for Faculty Power: The History of the University of Toronto Faculty Association, 1942 —1992. Toronto: University of Toronto Faculty Association, 1993.
Penner, R. “Unionization, Democracy and the University.” Interchange 25. 1 (1994): 49–53.
Ponak, A. and M. Thompson. “Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Voice of Experience.” Relations Industrielles 393 (1984): 449–463.
Pusser, B., and I. Ordorika. “Bringing Political Theory to University Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Governing Boards at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México and the University of California.” In J. C. Smart (ed). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume XVI, New York: Agathon Press, 2001, 147–194.
Stroup, H. Bureaucracy in Higher Education. New York: Free Press, 1966.
Task Force on University Accountability. University Accountability: A Strengthened Framework. Toronto: Task Force on University Accountability, 1993.
Tudivor, N. Universities for Sale: Resisting Corporate Control over Canadian Higher Education. Toronto: James Lorimer and Company, 1999.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, G.A. (2002). The Structure of University Governance in Canada: A Policy Network Approach. In: Amaral, A., Jones, G.A., Karseth, B. (eds) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6200-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9946-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive