Abstract
Anthropologists doing research in the field of medicine are still rather surprising for their research subjects. While psychologists have a clearly defined role within medicine, anthropologists remain, at least in Switzerland, undeterminable, even more so for the physicians than for the patients, as I may illustrate by a passage from my interview with the general practitioner Jonas Ender:
“On the one hand there are components like in any malignant progressive disease, but where you somehow never really know what is actually going on. (...). I have this patient with a Polycythaemia vera who...- are you a physician or a psychologist?
ck: Neither nor. An anthropologist, social scientist.
An anthropologist? — Well, I’ll have to stop speaking in technical terminology then. Okay, that is somehow a semi-malignant blood disease which can also develop over ten, fifteen years. Well, the blood produces too many red blood corpuscles.”
“People with HIV/AIDS are a vulnerable group that should be protected from researchers.”13
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kopp, C. (2002). Methods and Study Populations. In: The New Era of AIDS. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9860-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9860-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6187-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9860-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive