Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 44))

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

Heidegger frequently quotes Angelius Sigelius’s statement that the “rose is without why?”1 In The Principle of Reason, Heidegger appeals to this aphorism in order to circumscribe the limits of the principle of sufficient reason. He outlines the transformation whereby that principle no longer defines the subordination of grounded to ground, but instead prefigures the movement of stepping back into the difference between being and beings, into the priority of that difference.2 As he suggests, that principle must undergo a two thousand year incubation in order that the evoking of these new relations, the “crossing over” of a metaphysical emphasis by an alternative configuration of sense, can occur.3 This “crossing over” redefines the philosophical landscape so as to shift the precedence from what has occupied thought to what has remained unthought. The fixity of metaphysical terms gives way to “polyvalent words” like Satz, which denotes not only the conventional meaning of “principle” or “statement,” but also a richer sense of “movement.”4 Such transpositions of meanings prompt thought to undergo a “leap.” Thus, the “why?” is placed in abeyance as a receding ground from which thought “leaps” in the direction of an Abgrund, an abyss.5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Caputo, The Mystical Elements in Heidegger ’s Thought, pp. 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heidegger A, Der Satz vom Grund (Pfullingen: Günther Neske, 7591), pp. 95–97. The Principle ofReason, trans. Reginald Lilly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), pp. 53–54. See Frank Schalow, “The Question of Identity and its Recollection in Being’s Historical Unfolding,” Heidegger Studies, 11 (1995): 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heidegger, Der Satz vom Grund, p. 15; tr. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heidegger, Der Satz vom Grund, p. 151; tr. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See George Kovacs, “The Leap (Der Sprung) for Being in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis),” Man and World, 52 (1992), pp. 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emil L. Fackenheim, “Schelling’s Philosophy of Religion,” University of Tornoto Quarterly, 22/1 (Oct. 1952), pp. 51–71. Fackenheim suggests that Kierkegaard discovered his own notion of the “leap” by examining Schelling attempt to grasp the dualistic message of Christianity.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ricoeur, The Symbolism of Evil, pp. 4ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. GA 42, p. 237; tr. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Meara, “The Presence of Schelling in the Third Volume of Paul Tillich’s Systematic Theology,” pp. 791–991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karl Rahner, Foundations of Christian Faith (New York: Crossroads Publishing, 1982), pp. 322–532. Also see Thomas Sheehan, Karl Rahner (Athens: Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1987), pp. 57ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See John D. Caputo, The Prayers and Tears ofJacques Derrida: Religion without Religion (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GA 12, pp. 29–30; tr. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heidegger, Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik, GA 29/30 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983), pp. 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GA 65, pp. 405ff; tr. 285ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. GA 65, p. 403; tr. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  16. GA 65, p. 405; tr. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pöggeler, Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking, p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  18. GA 65, p. 409; tr. 287–288.

    Google Scholar 

  19. GA 65, p. 405; tr. 285. Also see Constantino Esposito, “Die Geschichte des letzten Gottes in Heideggers Beiträge zur Philosophie,” Heidegger Studies, 1 1(1995): 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Visker, “Un-european Desires,” p. 60. 21. Schelling, Of Human Freedom, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. GA 5, pp. 274–275; tr. 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  22. GA 5, pp. 274–275; tr. 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tillich, Dynamics of Faith, p. 114. The theological roots of the emphasis on love as agape emerge with the Pauline identification of Spirit with love. See Knox, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marx, The Philosophy of F. W. J. Schelling, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schelling, Of Human Freedom, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Benz, The Mystical Sources of German Romantic Philosophy, pp. 15–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. GA 42, pp. 261–270; tr. 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, p. 502. Also see O’Regan, The Heterodox Hegel, pp. 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  29. GA 5, p. 214 ; tr. 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Heidegger, Hegels Begriff der Erfahrung, Holzwege, GA 5, pp. 202–203. Hegel’s Concept of Experience, trans. J. Glenn Gray and Fred Wieck (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1970), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gnuse, “New Directions in Biblical Theology,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 70/3 (1995): 893–917. Also see Carl A. Raschke, “The New Cosmology and the Overcoming of Metaphysics,” Philosophy Today, 24/4 (1979), pp. 375–387. For a deconstructionist approach, see Mark Taylor, Erring (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), pp. 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kierkegaard A, Works of Love, trans. Lillian Swenson in A Kierkegaard Anthology, ed. Robert Bretall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946), pp. 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kisiel, The Genesis, pp. 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, pp. 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  36. GA 42; p. 190; tr. 109. See Wayne J. Froman, “Schelling’s Treatise on the Essence ofHunan Freedom and Heidegger’s Thought,” International Philosophical Quarterly, 30/4 (Dec. 1990): 465–470.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tracy, The Analogical Imagination, p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father (Boston: Beacon Press, 1987), pp. 25ff. Also see Julia Kristeva, Psychoanalysis and Faith, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schelling, “On the Search for Eternal Truths,” pp. 56–57. 41. GA 54, p. 169; tr. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Haar, “Heidegger and the God of Hölderlin,” p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Heidegger, What Is Called Thinking?, pp. 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pöggeler, “West-East Dialogue,” p. 73. 45. GA 2, p. 53; tr. 64. 46. GA 26, pp. 236–274; tr. 184–211.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stambaugh, The Finitude of Being, pp. 122ff.

    Google Scholar 

  44. GA 49, pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schelling, Of Human Freedom, pp. 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Julian Roberts, German Philosophy: An Introduction (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, Inc., 1988), pp. 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt, The Ubiquity of the Finite, pp. 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  48. GA 42, pp. 252–253; tr. 146. See Bernasconi, “Heidegger’s Other Sins of Omission,” p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See Donald Verene, Vico ’s Science ofImagination (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981), pp. 27–35. Schelling’s understanding of myth displays an ancestry which leads from Herder back to Vico. I am grateful to Randall Auxier for providing me with this reference. Also see Marx, The Philosophy of F. W. J. Schelling, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Veronique Fotí, Heidegger and the Poets (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International„ 1991), pp. 18–27. Fotí points to poiesis as essential to the development of the language of thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  51. GA 53, pp. 155–156; tr. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, pp. 164–165.

    Google Scholar 

  53. GA 42, p. 285; tr. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, pp. 227–240. Also see Alan M. Olson, “Myth Symbol, and Metaphorical Truth,” in Myth, Symbol and Reality (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1980), pp. 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  55. O’Regan, The Heterdox Hegel, pp. 278ff.

    Google Scholar 

  56. GA 26, p. 270; tr. 209. Also see Sherover, “Experiential Time and Religious Concern,” 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Adorno, Hegel: Three Studies, pp. 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Heidegger, On Time and Being, pp. 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Parvis Emad, “The Question of Technology and Will to Power,” in Kunst und Technik (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991), p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  60. GA 42, p. 268; tr. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Caputo, Radical Hermeneutics, pp. 166ff. Caputo, Radical Hermeneutics, pp. 582ff. Also see his Mystical Elements in Heidegger’s Thought, 82ff.

    Google Scholar 

  62. GA 65, p. 378; tr. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  63. GA 51, p. 121; tr. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  64. GA 42, p. 262; tr. 151. See Schelling, Of Human Freedom, pp. 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Haar, Heidegger and the Essence of Man, pp. 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lyotard, Heidegger and the “ jews ”, pp. 16–77. See Caputo, Demythologizing Heidegger, pp. 471–181.

    Google Scholar 

  67. GA 31, p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mattéi, “The Heideggerian Chiasmus,” pp. 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Buber, Eclipse of God, p. 57. See Proudhome, God and Being, pp. 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  70. GA 42, p. 220; tr. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lawrence Hatab, Myth and Philosophy (Lasalle, IL: Open Court, 1992), pp. 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pöggeler, “West-East Dialogue,” p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  73. GA 12, p. 19; tr. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Heidegger appeals to the double gesture of both the non-anthropocentric sense of Logos in the Gospel of John and the tendency to convert the divine word into a testimony of onto-theo-logy. See Heidegger, “Die Sprache,” Unterwegs zur Sprache, GA 12, pp. 12–13. “Language,” in Poetry, Language, Thought, pp. 192–193. Also see Caputo, Heidegger and Aquinas, pp. 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Alan Olson, Immanence and Transcendence (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979), p. 190.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. Kisiel, “Heidegger on Becoming a Christian,” p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kisiel, The Genesis, p. 88. As Kisiel points out, the young Heidegger followed Dissmann’s reading of Pauline mysticism in contemplating the dual senses of the “in” in Paul’s maxim. “Heidegger on Becoming a Christian,” p. 671. See Galations 2:02. “I live now but not I, but Christ lives in me.” For a theological discussion of this passage, see Knox, Chapters in a Life ofPaul, pp. 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kisiel, “Heidegger on Becoming a Christian,”p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Caputo, The Mystical Elements in Heidegger’s Thought, p. 41. For a different way of conceiving the phenomenon of love, see Kristeva, “Psychoanalysis and Faith,” p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Heidegger, “The Word of Nietzsche,” pp. 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  81. See Heidegger, What Is Called Thinking?, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Grugan, “The Instress of Being and the Coronach of Dasein in Hölderlin’s Germanien,” p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  83. See Heidegger, What Is Called Thinking?, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Heidegger, Identity and Difference, p. 27. See Heidegger, Nietzsche: Der europäische Nihilismus, GA 48 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1986), p. 285. Nietzsche, Vol. 4: Nihilism, ed. David F. Krell, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1982), p. 155. Also see Raschke, “The New Cosmology and the Overcoming of Metaphysics,” p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  85. GA 5, pp. 272–273; tr. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  86. See Karl Jaspers’ Philosophy, Vol. 3, trans. E. B. Ashton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,), pp. 119–147. Also see John Macquarrie, An Existentialist Theology (London: SCM Press, 1955), pp. 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  87. GA 54, p. 164; tr. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Tracy, Analogical Imagination, p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schalow, F. (2001). The Quest of Analogical Thinking. In: Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5831-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9773-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics