Abstract
Like a river that weaves its way back to its source, Heidegger’s thought continually nurtures its religious origins. Yet there is no convenient pattern, no easy formula by which we can gauge his interest in religious matters. Even Heidegger’s autobiography suggests that religion offered him more a felicitous detour than a straight path to his destination. In 1909 he entered a Jesuit seminary only to renounce his priestly vocation shortly thereafter.1 During that period Heidegger first acquainted himself with Husserl’s master text the Logical Investigations. Yet only after having written his qualifying dissertation on Duns Scotus (1916) and then having familiarized himself with the writings of such theological stalwarts as Eckhart, Luther, and Kierkegaard, did Heidegger pursue an apprenticeship with the father of phenomenology. A number of starts and stops, detours and transitions, characterize Heidegger’s early development. This trend continues throughout the lengthy maturation of his thought up to and including his later devotion to Hölderlin, his concern for the holy preserved in the “last god,” and his experiment with mythic-poetic thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 52.
Heidegger, “The Thinker as Poet,” in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1971), p. 9.
Heidegger, Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes, GA 32 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1982), pp. 182–183. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), p. 126.
Heidegger, “Der Spruch des Anaximander,” in Holzwege, GA 5 (Vittorio Klostermann, 1975), p. 364. “The Speech of Anaximander,” in Early Greek Thinking, trans. David F. Krell and Frank Capuzzi (Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc., 1975), p. 50.
Theodore Kisiel, The Genesis ofHeidegger’s Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), p. 176. See Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, GA 60 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995), pp. 335–339. See Merold Westphal, “Heidegger’s ‘theologische’ Juden Schriften,”Research in Phenomenology, 27 (1997): 247–261.
GA 60, pp. 336–338.
Kisiel, The Genesis, pp. 75, 86. See GA 60, pp. 79, 335–339.
Bultmann, Jesus Christ and Mythology, p. 50.
See van Buren, The Young Heidegger, pp. 145–146.
See Wilfred C. Smith, What Is Scripture? (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1933), pp. 240–242.
See Bernasconi, “On Heidegger’s Other Sins of Omission,” pp. 330–350.
Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics, trans. and ed. B. W. Bromiley (New York: Harper & Row, Inc., 1961), pp. 123–125 and H. Richard Niebuhr, The Meaning ofRevelation (New York: MacMillan Publishing, 1941), pp. 17–19.
Bambach, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis ofHistoricism, p. 191.
Barth, Church Dogmatics, p. 124.
Bambach, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis ofHistoricism, pp. 188–195.
See Schalow, “Christianity’s Elusive Style,” 70–75.
Niebuhr, The Meaning ofRevelation, p. 17. Also see GA 60, p. 330.
Niebuhr, The Meaning ofRevelation, p. 17.
Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Walter Kaufmann in The Portable Nietzsche, ed. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, Inc., 1954), p. 103.
John D. Caputo, Radical Hermeneutics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 204–206.
Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, trans. Walter Kaufmann in On the Genealogy ofMorals and Ecce Homo (New York: Random House, Inc., 1967), p. 335.
Quoted in E cce H omo, p. 220.
Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, p. 225.
Ibid., p. 225
Nietzsche, The Antichrist, in The Portable Nietzsche, pp. 612–613.
Paul Ricoeur, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), p. 5.
Paul Ricoeur, “Preface to Bultmann,”Conflict of Interpretations, ed. Don Ihde (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974), pp. 91ff.
Paul Tillich, Dynamics ofFaith (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1957), p. 42.
Tillich, Dynamics of Faith, pp. 50–51.
Thomas F. O’Meara, “The Presence of Schelling in the Third Volume of Paul Tillich’s Systematic Theology in Religion et Culture,” ed. Michel Desplan, Jean-Claude Petit et Jean Richard (Les Presses de L’Université Laval, 1987), p. 193.
See John Macquarrie, God-Talk (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1967), pp. 144–145. Because Heidegger and Bultmann were colleagues at Marburg, it is sometimes difficult to isolate the influence each my have had on the other. But as Heidegger’s emphasis on human existence became more formalized and equated with temporal finitude, it is clear that Bultmann differs by emphasizing the self’s dependence on God. See Michael E. Zimmerman, Eclipse ofthe Self(Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1981), p. 17. Also see van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 152.
van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 143.
Bultmann, Jesus Christ and Mythology, pp. 40–41.
Gadamer, “The Marburg Theology,” p. 38.
van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 152.
Tillich, The Dynamics of Faith, p. 115.
Gadamer, “The Marburg Theology,” p. 31.
van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 143
Gadamer, Heidegger ’s Ways, p. 181.
Heidegger, “Hölderlin und das Wesen der Dichtung,” in Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung, GA 4 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1981), p. 33. “Hölderlin and the Essence of Poetry,” trans. Douglas Scott in Existence and Being, ed. Werner Brock (Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1949), p. 170. See Richard Polt, Heidegger: An Introduction (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 8–12.
Heidegger, “Memorial Address,” in Discourse on Thinking, trans. John Anderson (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc., 1966), p. 43.
Bernhard Welte, “The Speech at Heidegger’s Burial,” in Heidegger the Man and the Thinker, ed. Thomas Sheehan (Chicago: Precedent Press, 1981), p. 75.
Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, 481–484.
Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, pp. 190–191. See James Risser, Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1997), pp. 65–72.
Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, p. 189.
Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, pp. 482–484.
Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, p. 125.
Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, p. 190.
Heidegger, “Memorial Address,” p. 190. For a discussion of the “chthonic,” as it bears on such mythic dimensions of the “underworld” and other examples of the profane, see John J. Davenport, “A Phenomenology of the Profane: Heidegger, Blumenberg and the Structure of the Chthonic,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 32/2 (May 1999): 182–206.
Carl A. Raschke, Fire and Roses: Postmodernity and the Thought of the Body (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996), p. 181.
See Immanuel Kant’s discussion of God’s love. Kant, Prolegemona to Any Future Metaphysics, p. 106n.
Gadamer, Heidegger ’s Ways, p. 188.
See Charles M. Sherover, “Experiential Time and Religious Concern,” Zygon, 16 (Dec. 1981): 323–344.
Gadamer, Heidegger ’s Ways, p. 181.
Gadamer, Heideger’s Ways, p. 175.
Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, pp. 178–179.
GA 65, p. 411; tr. 289.
Gadamer, Heidegger’s Ways, p. 125.
Philipse, Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being, pp. 187–188.
Heidegger, Einleitung in die Philosophie, GA 27 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1996), pp. 357–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schalow, F. (2001). From Positivism to Postmodernity. In: Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5831-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9773-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive