Skip to main content

Peirce and the Continuum from a Philosophical Point of View

  • Chapter
  • 293 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 306))

Abstract

Peirce used the concept of continuity for the description of generality. His continuum is of greater “cardinality” than any set and contains infmitesimals. Arguing in continuous contexts demands different logical laws from those in discrete contexts. It is not clear what Peirce meant by the Principle of Excluded Middle. Peirce developed a three-valued logic. We have good reasons to assume that the Principle of Bivalence is not valid for statements about the whole continuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fisch, M, Turquette, A. (1966). “Peirce’s Triadic Logic”, Transactions 2 of the Charles S. Peirce Society 2 (2), 71–85.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Herron, T. (1997). “Charles Sanders Peirce’s Theories of Infinitesimals”, TCSPS 33 (3), 590–645.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lane, R. (1997). “ Peirce Entanglement with the Principle of Excluded Middle and Contradiction”, TCSPS 33 (3), 680–793.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myrvold, W. (1995). “ Peirce on Cantor’s Paradox and the Continuum”, TCSPS 31 (3), 508–541.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noble, N. (1989). “ Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity and the Concept of Possibility”, TCSPS 25 (2), 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oehler, K. (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce, München: Beck’sche Reihe.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peirce, C. (1931–1958). Collected Papers,(eds. Hartshorne C. et al.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peirce, C. (1966). “ Logic Notebook (MS 339)”, 344 r, in: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, microfilm edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peirce, C. (1966). “MS 9”, 1903, in: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, microfilm edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peirce, C. (1966). “Prescott Book (MS 277)”, January 1908, in: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, microfilm edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peirce, C. (1966). “MS 611”, 1908, 13 in: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, microfilm edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peirce, C. (1966). “The Art of Reasoning Elucidated (MS 678)”, 3435, in: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, microfilm edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peirce, C. (1983). Phänomen und Logik der Zeichen, (ed. Pape, H.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peirce, C. (1976) “Multitude and Continuity”, 84–88, 97–100, in: The New Elements of Mathematics, Vol III, (ed. Eisele, C.), The Hague, Paris: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peirce, C. (1976). “N-Valued Logic”, 748, 750, in: The New Elements of Mathematics, Vol III, (ed. Eisele, C.), The Hague, Paris: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peirce, C. (1992). “The Logic of Relatives”, 147–148, 157–160, in: Reasoning and the Logic of Things, (ed. Ketner, K.), Cambridge, MA: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peirce, C. (1992). “The Logic of Continuity”, 247, in: Reasoning and the Logic of Things, (ed. Ketner, K.), Cambridge, MA: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peirce, C. (1998). “What is a Sign”, 4–5, in: The essential Peirce, Volume II (ed. by the Peirce Edition Project), Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Potter, V; Shields, P. (1977). “Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity”, TCSPS 13 (1), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robin, R. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zermelo, E. (1904). “Beweis, daß jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann”, Mathematische Annalen 59, 514–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zink, J. (2001). Peirce and the Continuum from a Philosophical Point of View. In: Schuster, P., Berger, U., Osswald, H. (eds) Reuniting the Antipodes — Constructive and Nonstandard Views of the Continuum. Synthese Library, vol 306. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9757-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9757-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5885-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9757-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics