Skip to main content

Abstract

Production of recombinant proteins using different host systems may lead to a different performance with respect to productivity or selectivity. Therefore, the conditions under which the systems perform may be different A comparison between two systems can only be made when both are cultivated at their optimal conditions. In order to make such comparisons possible one needs optimization procedures which allow to obtain the optima within a few experimental steps only. The straightforward approach to such optimization procedures is model supported optimization. Here we propose an evolutionary strategy by which the optimum of the operational procedure is obtained iteratively in cycles involving predictions and validation experiments.

The strategy will be illustrated at two fed-batch protein productions with very different host cells, thus showing that such a model supported optimization can be successfully used on physiologically significantly different systems. The first example, the optimization of the fed-batch-production of the native recombinant viral capsid protein VP1 with the host cell Escherichia coli, necessitates an optimization of several time-dependent control variables. The non-linear substrate feeding-profile, the time instant for the chemical induction and the profile for the fermentation temperature after induction were optimized simultaneously.

The second example is the optimization of protein production with a recombinant yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. This requires a u-controlled fed-batch-fermentation in order to reduce the byproduct (ethanol, organic acid esters) formation. The central element of the strategy for this particular optimization is series of iterative cycles, consisting of: identification, modeling, optimization, proposal of the fermentation-regime, validation fermentation, and identification.

In both cases it is possible to find optimized fermentation-protocols with only few iteration cycles and to validate the results experimentally. At the same time the backbone of the strategy, the dynamic process model is improved. This model may be a combination of first principle approaches and data-driven heuristics. It can immediately be used to further improve the process by means of advanced model supported control strategies. Such control is highly advantageous when it comes to an industrial production of the protein under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Galvanauskas, V., Simutis, R., Volk, N. and Lübbert, A. Model based design of a biochemical cultivation process. Bioproc Eng 18 (1998): 227–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers, J., Zeeman, A.M., Luttik, M., Thiele, C., Castrillo, J.I., Steensma, H.Y., van Dijken, J.P. and Pronk, J.T. Regulation of alcoholic fermentation in batch and chemostat cultures of Kluyveromyces lactis CBS 2359. Yeast 14 (1998): 459–469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salunke, D., Caspar, D.L.D., and Garcea, R.L. Self-assembly of purified Polyomavirus capsid protein VP1. Cell 46 (1986): 895–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, U., Kenklies, J., Rudolph, R. and Böhm, G. Site specific fluorescence labeling of recombinant Polyomavirus-like particles. Biol Chem 380 (1999): 397–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simutis, R. and Lübbert, A. Advances in modeling for bioprocess supervision and control. In G. Subramanian, (ed.): Bioseparation and Bioprocessing, Vol I. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim/D, pp. 411–461, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnleitner, B. and Käppeli, O. Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiration capacity, formulation and verification of a hypothesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 28 (1986): 927–937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, N., Hertel, T. and Lübbert, A. ModellgestQtze Optimierung der Produktion des Virus-Hüllproteins VPl-DHFRmit E. coli BL21. Chem Technik 4 (1998): 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenke, F.T., Kapp, L. and Breunig, K.D. Regulated phosphorylation of the Gal4p inhibitor Gal80p of Kluyveromyces lactis revealed by mutational analysis. Biol Chem 380 (1999): 419–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Volk, N., Franco-Lara, E., Galvanauskas, V., Lübbert, A. (2001). Model Supported Optimization of Fed-Batch Fermentations for Recombinant Protein Production. In: Merten, OW., et al. Recombinant Protein Production with Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells. A Comparative View on Host Physiology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9749-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9749-4_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5756-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9749-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics