Abstract
In this chapter I explore various objections to the claim that for a belief to count as knowledge it must have been caused in some way. First, in this section, I consider the claim that many beliefs are uncaused and yet they can still constitute knowledge. If beliefs can be uncaused and if such uncaused beliefs can be items of knowledge, then both the strong causal condition:
-
(SC) S knows that p only if the fact that p is causally connected to S’s belief that p,
and the weaker causal condition:
-
(WC) S knows that p only if S’s that p was caused in an ‘appropriate’ way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
My arguments are developed from Kitcher (1984, pp. 13–17).
See Musgrave (1989 pp. 332–33) for more on this distinction.
Musgrave (1993, p. 251) makes a similar point.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheyne, C. (2001). Beliefs and Causes. In: Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9747-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9747-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5836-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9747-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive