Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 222))

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

Chemical formulas, those small icons which chemists are wont to scribble in their notebooks and in odd places, such as the back of an envelope, and which to the general public have become emblems of their profession, are an excellent topic for history. These artefacts remain today tools for communication within the community of chemists. They continue serving as didactic instruments in teaching. The establishment of an individual formula for a chemical compound or a substance chronicles the laboratory methods, both routine and specific, which came into play in order for it to be written down and to assume the status of the analog of a word, to be stored within the growing lexicon of chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ampère, André Marie. “Lettre de M. Ampère à M. le comte Berthollet, sur la détermination des proportions dans lesquelles les corps se combinent d’après le nombre et les dispositions respectives des molécules dont leurs parties intégrantes sont composées.” Ann. de Chim. et de Phys. 90 (1814): 43–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Eugen and Franz Eiger. “Ueber die Reduction des Orthonitroacetophenons–ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der ersten Indigosynthese.” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 36 (1903): 1611–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. “Rhétorique de l’image.” In L ‘obvie et l’obtus. Essais critiques III, edited by Roland Barthes, 31–32. Paris: Le Seuil, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William H. The Norton History of Chemistry. New York: W. W. Norton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William H. Justus von Liebig: The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, John Hedley. Thinking about Matter, Studies in the History of Chemical Philosophy. Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, Stephen G. The Kind of Motion We Call Heat: A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century. Dordrecht: North-Holland, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Emil and Otto Fischer. “Ueber Farbstoffe der Rosanilingruppe.” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 12 (1879): 2344–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. “Experimentation and Scientific Realism.” In Scientific Realism, edited by Jarrett Leplin, 154–72. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Roald, and Pierre Laszlo. “Representation in Chemistry.” Angewandte Chemie, Int. Ed. Engl. 30 (1991): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehrman, F., and Otto Kramer. “Ueber Darstellung und Umwandlungen des Iso-Phenosafranins.” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 33 (1900): 3074–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, Robert, Elaine Chin, Joel Russell, and Nancy Marx. “The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 9, no. 2 (2000): 105–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, Alfred. Anthropology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, Pierre. La parole des choses, Collection Savoir: Sciences. Paris: Hermann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann, C., and C. Paal. “Ueber Derivate des Allylamins.” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 16 (1883): 523–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Ernst. “Die Baeyersche Spannungstheorie und die Struktur des Diamanten.” Journal für Praktische Chemie 98, no. 2 (1918): 315–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Ernst. “Zur Theorie des cis-trans-Isomerie des Dekahydro-Naphtalins.” Berichte der deuschen chemischen Gesellschaft 55 (1922): 230–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, Donna Jo. Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Mary Jo. Before Big Science: The Pursuit of Modern Chemistry and Physics, 1800–1940. New York and London: Twayne-Prentice Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remsen, Ira. Organic Chemistry. 5th rev. ed. Boston: D. C. Heath, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, Alan J. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannizzaro. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, Alan J. The Quiet Revolution: Hermann Kolbe and the Science of Organic Chemistry, California Studies in the History of Science No. 11. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, Hermann. “Ueber die geometrischen Isomieren der Hexamethylenderivate.” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 23 (1890): 1363–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, Hermann. “Über die Konfigurationen der Polymethylenringe.” Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 10 (1892): 203–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. G. The Wiswesser Line-Formula Notation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire: Graphics Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkade, Pieter E. A History of the Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry. Delft: Delft University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Dennis. The Power of Maps. New York: The Guilford Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, Charles-Adolphe. La théorie atomique. Paris: G. Baillière, 1879.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laszlo, P. (2001). Conventionalities in Formula Writing. In: Klein, U. (eds) Tools and Modes of Representation in the Laboratory Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 222. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9737-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9737-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5859-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9737-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics